1. Aesthetic Evaluation of Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Fat Transfer vs. Implants
- Author
-
Wederfoort, Jamilla L M, Kleeven, Alieske, Hommes, Juliette E, Van Kuijk, Sander M J, van der Hulst, René R W J, Piatkowski, Andrzej, MUMC+: MA Plastische Chirurgie (9), MUMC+: MA Heelkunde (9), Plastische Chirurgie (PLC), RS: NUTRIM - R2 - Liver and digestive health, MUMC+: KIO Kemta (9), RS: CAPHRI - R2 - Creating Value-Based Health Care, and MUMC+: MA Plastische Chirurgie (3)
- Subjects
Surgery - Abstract
Background Autologous fat transfer (AFT) seems to be a new minimal invasive method for total breast reconstruction, yet how patients, surgeons, and laymen evaluate cosmesis is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the aesthetic outcome of AFT (intervention group) for total breast reconstruction post-mastectomy, as compared to implant-based reconstruction (IBR) (control group). Methods A random and blinded 3D photographic aesthetic outcome study was performed on a selection of 50 patients, scored by three panels: plastic surgeons, breast cancer patients, and laymen. Secondary outcomes included agreement within groups and possible patient characteristics influencing scoring. Results Breast cancer patients and plastic surgeons did not differ in the aesthetic scores between the treatment groups. In contrast, the laymen group scored AFT patients lower than IBR patients (− 1.04, p Conclusion Evaluation of aesthetic outcomes varies greatly. Hence, aesthetic outcome remains a very personal measure and this emphasizes the importance of thorough patient counseling including information on achievable aesthetic results before starting a reconstructive procedure. Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
- Published
- 2023