1. Acupotomy by an ultrasound-guided technique
- Author
-
Yifeng Shen, Qiaoyin Zhou, Yan Jia, Xiaojie Sun, Xinyue Zhu, Shiliang Li, and Zuyun Qiu
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Visual analogue scale ,Acupuncture Therapy ,MEDLINE ,Cochrane Library ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,systematic review ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Study Protocol Systematic Review ,Humans ,Medicine ,Medical physics ,protocol ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Ultrasonography, Interventional ,Ultrasound image ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ,Protocol (science) ,ultrasound-guided technique ,Data collection ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,Ultrasound guided ,acupotomy ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,business ,Systematic Reviews as Topic ,Research Article - Abstract
Background: Acupotomy is a miniature surgery instrument. It can cut and detach the abnormal, cicatricial, and contractured tissues by causing only microtrauma. Acupotomy has been widely used clinically with a satisfactory efficacy. With the development of ultrasound technology, ultrasound-guided acupotomy has shown great value in clinical practice. But it is not yet clear that ultrasound-guided acupotomy is very effective and safe. Therefore, it is important to re-evaluate the available evidence to reach a relatively convincing conclusion that acupotomy by ultrasound-guided technique is a better choice than traditional acupotomy. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide a method for evaluating the effectiveness and safety of acupotomy by ultrasound-guided technique. Methods: This systematic review will be performed by searching relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) without any language or publication status restriction from inception to December 2019 by 2 researchers in nine databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese literature databases, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database [CBM], China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], China Science and Journal Database [CSJD], and Wanfang Database). All RCTs evaluating acupotomy by the ultrasound-guided technique will be included in this study. Visual analog scale (VAS) and change of symptom will be assessed as the primary outcomes. The change in the ultrasound image, safety and adverse events, and acceptability will be assessed as secondary outcomes. The selection of study, data collection and analysis, and assessment of the study quality will be completed independently by 2 researchers. RevMan v.5.3 will be used for meta-analysis if no significant heterogeneity is detected. Continuous outcomes will be presented as the mean difference (MD) or standardized MD, while dichotomous data will be expressed as the relative risk. Results: This study will provide a high-quality synthesis of QL and AR to assess the effectiveness and safety of acupotomy by ultrasound-guided technique. Conclusion: This systematic review will provide evidence to judge whether acupotomy by ultrasound-guided technique is an effective the efficacy and safety intervention. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018109070.
- Published
- 2019