Search

Objectives To investigate humoral responses and safety of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory rheumatic disease (SAARD) patients subjected or not to treatment modifications during vaccination. Methods A nationwide, multicenter study, including 605 SAARD patients and 116 controls, prospectively evaluated serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-protein IgG antibody titers, side-effects, and disease activity, one month after complete vaccination, in terms of distinct treatment modification strategies (none, partial and extended modifications). Independent risk factors associated with hampered humoral responses were identified by data-driven multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results Patients with extended treatment modifications responded to vaccines similarly to controls as well as SAARD patients without immunosuppressive therapy (97.56% vs 100%, p = 0.2468 and 97.56% vs 97.46%, p > 0.9999, respectively). In contrast, patients with partial or without therapeutic modifications responded in 87.50% and 84.50%, respectively. Furthermore, SAARD patients with extended treatment modifications developed higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels compared to those without or with partial modifications (median:7.90 vs 7.06 vs 7.1, p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0195, respectively). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), rituximab (RTX) and methotrexate (MTX) negatively affected anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral responses. In 10.5% of vaccinated patients, mild clinical deterioration was noted; however, no differences in the incidence of deterioration were observed among the distinct treatment modification SAARD subgroups. Side-effects were generally comparable between SAARD patients and controls. Conclusions In SAARD patients, mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are effective and safe, both in terms of side-effects and disease flares. Treatment with MMF, RTX and/or MTX compromises anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses, which are restored upon extended treatment modifications without affecting disease activity.

Background Literature describing triggers of GFAP astrocytopathy (GFAP-A) is limited. We report a case of GFAP-A in a patient with recent messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination and discuss the possible pathogenesis. Case description A 45-year-old gentleman presented with features of meningoencephalitis 31 days after the first dose and 4 days after the second dose of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. He sequentially developed brainstem/cerebellar, autonomic and cord dysfunction. Cerebrospinal fluid was positive for GFAP autoantibody. Clinical improvement occurred after intravenous methylprednisolone and immunoglobulins. Conclusion Although we are uncertain of a causal link of GFAP-A to mRNA vaccine, indirect activation of an underlying dysregulated immune milieu is plausible.