Search

Tissue-level mechanics (e.g., stress and strain) are important factors governing tissue remodeling and development of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), and hence, the success of physical rehabilitation. To date, no clinically feasible analysis toolbox has been introduced and used to inform clinical decision making with subject-specific in-depth joint mechanics of different activities. Herein, we utilized a rapid state-of-the-art electromyography-assisted musculoskeletal finite element analysis toolbox with fibril-reinforced poro(visco)elastic cartilages and menisci to investigate knee mechanics in different activities. Tissue mechanical responses, believed to govern collagen damage, cell death, and fixed charge density loss of proteoglycans, were characterized within 15 patients with KOA while various daily activities and rehabilitation exercises were performed. Results showed more inter-participant variation in joint mechanics during rehabilitation exercises compared to daily activities. Accordingly, the devised workflow may be used for designing subject-specific rehabilitation protocols. Further, results showed the potential to tailor rehabilitation exercises, or assess capacity for daily activity modifications, to optimally load knee tissue, especially when mechanically-induced cartilage degeneration and adaptation are of interest.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent disease affecting the hip and knee joint and is characterized by load-mediated pain and decreased quality of life. Dependent on involved joint, patients present antalgic movement compensations, aiming to decrease loading on the involved joint. However, the associated alterations in mechanical loading of the ipsi- and contra-lateral lower limb joints, are less documented. Here, we documented the biomechanical fingerprint of end-stage hip and knee osteoarthritis patients in terms of ipsilateral and contralateral hip and knee loading during walking and stair ambulation. METHODS: Three-dimensional motion-analysis was performed in 20 hip, 18 knee osteoarthritis patients and 12 controls during level walking and stair ambulation. Joint contact forces were calculated using a standard musculoskeletal modelling workflow in Opensim. Involved and contralateral hip and knee joint loading was compared against healthy controls using independent t-tests (p

The assessment of knee or hip joint loading by external joint moments is mainly used to draw conclusions on clinical decision making. However, the correlation between internal and external loads has not been systematically analyzed. This systematic review aims, therefore, to clarify the relationship between external and internal joint loading measures during gait. A systematic database search was performed to identify appropriate studies for inclusion. In total, 4,554 articles were identified, while 17 articles were finally included in data extraction. External joint loading parameters were calculated using the inverse dynamics approach and internal joint loading parameters by musculoskeletal modeling or instrumented prosthesis. It was found that the medial and total knee joint contact forces as well as hip joint contact forces in the first half of stance can be well predicted using external joint moments in the frontal plane, which is further improved by including the sagittal joint moment. Worse correlations were found for the peak in the second half of stance as well as for internal lateral knee joint contact forces. The estimation of external joint moments is useful for a general statement about the peak in the first half of stance or for the maximal loading. Nevertheless, when investigating diseases as valgus malalignment, the estimation of lateral knee joint contact forces is necessary for clinical decision making because external joint moments could not predict the lateral knee joint loading sufficient enough. Dependent on the clinical question, either estimating the external joint moments by inverse dynamics or internal joint contact forces by musculoskeletal modeling should be used.

The assessment of knee or hip joint loading by external joint moments is mainly used to draw conclusions on clinical decision making. However, the correlation between internal and external loads has not been systematically analyzed. This systematic review aims, therefore, to clarify the relationship between external and internal joint loading measures during gait. A systematic database search was performed to identify appropriate studies for inclusion. In total, 4,554 articles were identified, while 17 articles were finally included in data extraction. External joint loading parameters were calculated using the inverse dynamics approach and internal joint loading parameters by musculoskeletal modeling or instrumented prosthesis. It was found that the medial and total knee joint contact forces as well as hip joint contact forces in the first half of stance can be well predicted using external joint moments in the frontal plane, which is further improved by including the sagittal joint moment. Worse correlations were found for the peak in the second half of stance as well as for internal lateral knee joint contact forces. The estimation of external joint moments is useful for a general statement about the peak in the first half of stance or for the maximal loading. Nevertheless, when investigating diseases as valgus malalignment, the estimation of lateral knee joint contact forces is necessary for clinical decision making because external joint moments could not predict the lateral knee joint loading sufficient enough. Dependent on the clinical question, either estimating the external joint moments by inverse dynamics or internal joint contact forces by musculoskeletal modeling should be used.

Reduced external knee adduction moments in the second half of stance after total hip replacement have been reported in hip osteoarthritis patients. This reduction is thought to shift the load from the medial to the lateral knee compartment and as such increase the risk for knee osteoarthritis. The knee adduction moment is a surrogate for the load distribution between the medial and lateral compartments of the knee and not a valid measure for the tibiofemoral contact forces which are the result of externally applied forces and muscle forces. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the distribution of the tibiofemoral contact forces over the knee compartments in unilateral hip osteoarthritis patients 1 year after receiving a primary total hip replacement differs from healthy controls. Musculoskeletal modeling on gait was performed in OpenSim using the detailed knee model of Lerner et al. (2015) for 19 patients as well as for 15 healthy controls of similar age. Knee adduction moments were calculated by the inverse dynamics analysis, medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces with the joint reaction force analysis. Moments and contact forces of patients and controls were compared using Statistical Parametric Mapping two-sample t-tests. Knee adduction moments and medial tibiofemoral contact forces of both the ipsi- and contralateral leg were not significantly different compared to healthy controls. The contralateral leg showed 14% higher medial tibiofemoral contact forces compared to the ipsilateral (operated) leg during the second half of stance. During the first half of stance, the lateral tibiofemoral contact force of the contralateral leg was 39% lower and the ratio 32% lower compared to healthy controls. In contrast, during the second half of stance the forces were significantly higher (39 and 26%, respectively) compared to healthy controls. The higher ratio indicates a changed distribution whereas the increased lateral tibiofemoral contact forces indicate a higher lateral knee joint loading in the contralateral leg in OA patients after total hip replacement (THR). Musculoskeletal modeling using a detailed knee model can be useful to detect differences in the load distribution between the medial and lateral knee compartment which cannot be verified with the knee adduction moment.

Reduced external knee adduction moments in the second half of stance after total hip replacement have been reported in hip osteoarthritis patients. This reduction is thought to shift the load from the medial to the lateral knee compartment and as such increase the risk for knee osteoarthritis. The knee adduction moment is a surrogate for the load distribution between the medial and lateral compartments of the knee and not a valid measure for the tibiofemoral contact forces which are the result of externally applied forces and muscle forces. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the distribution of the tibiofemoral contact forces over the knee compartments in unilateral hip osteoarthritis patients 1 year after receiving a primary total hip replacement differs from healthy controls. Musculoskeletal modeling on gait was performed in OpenSim using the detailed knee model of Lerner et al. (2015) for 19 patients as well as for 15 healthy controls of similar age. Knee adduction moments were calculated by the inverse dynamics analysis, medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces with the joint reaction force analysis. Moments and contact forces of patients and controls were compared using Statistical Parametric Mapping two-sample t-tests. Knee adduction moments and medial tibiofemoral contact forces of both the ipsi- and contralateral leg were not significantly different compared to healthy controls. The contralateral leg showed 14% higher medial tibiofemoral contact forces compared to the ipsilateral (operated) leg during the second half of stance. During the first half of stance, the lateral tibiofemoral contact force of the contralateral leg was 39% lower and the ratio 32% lower compared to healthy controls. In contrast, during the second half of stance the forces were significantly higher (39 and 26%, respectively) compared to healthy controls. The higher ratio indicates a changed distribution whereas the increased lateral tibiofemoral contact forces indicate a higher lateral knee joint loading in the contralateral leg in OA patients after total hip replacement (THR). Musculoskeletal modeling using a detailed knee model can be useful to detect differences in the load distribution between the medial and lateral knee compartment which cannot be verified with the knee adduction moment.

The generation of subject-specific musculoskeletal models of the lower limb has become a feasible task thanks to improvements in medical imaging technology and musculoskeletal modelling software. Nevertheless, clinical use of these models in paediatric applications is still limited for what concerns the estimation of muscle and joint contact forces. Aiming to improve the current state of the art, a methodology to generate highly personalized subject-specific musculoskeletal models of the lower limb based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans was codified as a step-by-step procedure and applied to data from eight juvenile individuals. The generated musculoskeletal models were used to simulate 107 gait trials using stereophotogrammetric and force platform data as input. To ensure completeness of the modelling procedure, muscles’ architecture needs to be estimated. Four methods to estimate muscles’ maximum isometric force and two methods to estimate musculotendon parameters (optimal fiber length and tendon slack length) were assessed and compared, in order to quantify their influence on the models’ output. Reported results represent the first comprehensive subject-specific model-based characterization of juvenile gait biomechanics, including profiles of joint kinematics and kinetics, muscle forces and joint contact forces. Our findings suggest that, when musculotendon parameters were linearly scaled from a reference model and the muscle force-length-velocity relationship was accounted for in the simulations, realistic knee contact forces could be estimated and these forces were not sensitive the method used to compute muscle maximum isometric force.

Background Musculoskeletal modelling is a common means by which to non-invasively analyse movement. Such models have largely been used to observe function in both healthy and patient populations. However, utility in a clinical environment is largely unknown. The aim of this review was to explore existing uses of musculoskeletal models as a clinical intervention, or decision-making, tool. Methods A literature search was performed using PubMed and Scopus to find articles published since 2010 and relating to musculoskeletal modelling and joint and muscle forces. Findings 4662 abstracts were found, of which 39 relevant articles were reviewed. Journal articles were categorised into 5 distinct groups: non-surgical treatment, orthoses assessment, surgical decision making, surgical intervention assessment and rehabilitation regime assessment. All reviewed articles were authored by collaborations between clinicians and engineers/modellers. Current uses included insight into the development of osteoarthritis, identifying candidates for hamstring lengthening surgery, and the assessment of exercise programmes to reduce joint damage. Interpretation There is little evidence showing the use of musculoskeletal modelling as a tool for patient care, despite the ability to assess long-term joint loading and muscle overuse during functional activities, as well as clinical decision making to avoid unfavourable treatment outcomes. Continued collaboration between model developers should aim to create clinically-friendly models which can be used with minimal input and experience by healthcare professionals to determine surgical necessity and suitability for rehabilitation regimes, and in the assessment of orthotic devices.

Background: Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a causative factor for hip pain and early hip osteoarthritis. Although cam FAI can alter hip joint biomechanics, it is unclear what role muscle forces play and how they affect the hip joint loading. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to examine the muscle contributions and hip contact forces in individuals with symptomatic cam FAI during level walking. Patients with symptomatic cam FAI would demonstrate different muscle and hip contact forces during gait. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eighteen patients with symptomatic cam FAI were matched for age and body mass index with 18 control participants. Each participant’s walking kinematics and kinetics were recorded throughout a gait cycle (ipsilateral foot-strike to ipsilateral foot-off) by use of a motion capture system and force plates. Muscle and hip contact forces were subsequently computed by use of a musculoskeletal modeling program and static optimization methods. Results: The FAI group walked slower and with shorter steps, demonstrating reduced joint motions and moments during contralateral foot-strike, compared with the control group. The FAI group showed reduced psoas major (median, 1.1 newtons per bodyweight [N/BW]; interquartile range [IQR], 1.0-1.5 N/BW) and iliacus forces (median, 1.2 N/BW; IQR, 1.0-1.6 N/BW), during contralateral foot-strike, compared with the control group (median, 1.6 N/BW; IQR, 1.3-1.6 N/BW, P = .004; and median, 1.5 N/BW; IQR, 1.3-1.6 N/BW, P = .03, respectively), which resulted in lower hip contact forces in the anterior ( P = .026), superior ( P = .02), and medial directions ( P = .038). The 3 vectors produced a resultant peak force at the anterosuperior aspect of the acetabulum for both groups, with the FAI group demonstrating a substantially lower magnitude. Conclusion: FAI participants altered their walking kinematics and kinetics, especially during contralateral foot-strike, as a protective mechanism, which resulted in reduced psoas major and iliacus muscle force and anterosuperior hip contact force estimations. Clinical Relevance: Limited hip mobility not only is attributed to bone-on-bone impingement, caused by cam morphology, but could be attributed to musculature as well. Not only would the psoas major and iliacus be able to protect the hip joint during flexion-extension, athletic conditioning could further strengthen core muscles for improved hip mobility and pelvic balance.

We explored the tibiofemoral contact forces and the relative contributions of muscles and external loads to those contact forces during various gait tasks. Second, we assessed the relationships between external gait measures and contact forces. A calibrated electromyography-driven neuromusculoskeletal model estimated the tibiofemoral contact forces during walking (1.44 ± 0.22 m s−1), running (4.38 ± 0.42 m s−1) and sidestepping (3.58 ± 0.50 m s−1) in healthy adults (n = 60, 27.3 ± 5.4 years, 1.75 ± 0.11 m, and 69.8 ± 14.0 kg). Contact forces increased from walking (∼1–2.8 BW) to running (∼3–8 BW), sidestepping had largest maximum total (8.47 ± 1.57 BW) and lateral contact forces (4.3 ± 1.05 BW), while running had largest maximum medial contact forces (5.1 ± 0.95 BW). Relative muscle contributions increased across gait tasks (up to 80–90% of medial contact forces), and peaked during running for lateral contact forces (∼90%). Knee adduction moment (KAM) had weak relationships with tibiofemoral contact forces (all R2 < 0.36) and the relationships were gait task-specific. Step-wise regression of multiple external gait measures strengthened relationships (0.20 < Radj2 < 0.78), but were variable across gait tasks. Step-wise regression equations from a particular gait task (e.g. walking) produced large errors when applied to a different gait task (e.g. running or sidestepping). Muscles well stabilized the knee, increasing their role in stabilization from walking to running to sidestepping. KAM was a poor predictor of medial contact force and load distributions. Step-wise regression models results suggest the relationships between external gait measures and contact forces cannot be generalized across tasks. Neuromusculoskeletal modelling may be required to examine tibiofemoral contact forces and role of muscle in knee stabilization across gait tasks.

The prediction of musculo-tendon forces developed during daily living tasks is essential to assess movement control and joint contact forces, and then provide insight to improve diagnosis and treatment follow-up of neurological and orthopedic disorders. Direct measurement of the musculo-tendon forces is hardly possible and the redundancy inherent in the musculo-skeletal system yields not enough equilibrium equations to compute these forces. Different methods have been proposed to overcome this problem, requiring numerous input parameters, most of them difficult or impossible to adjust to a specific subject. These methods will be exposed and their limits pointed out. Anyway, further development is needed in order that the model-based prediction of musculo-tendon forces can be used for clinical purposes.; La prédiction des forces musculo-tendineuses développées au cours des tâches de la vie courante est essentielle pour accéder au contrôle du mouvement et aux actions de contact articulaires, et permet d'améliorer le diagnostic et le suivi du traitement des désordres neurologiques et orthopédiques. La mesure directe des forces musculo-tendineuses est difficilement réalisable et la redondance inhérente au système musculo-squelettique induit un nombre d'équations d'équilibre insuffisant pour calculer ces forces. Plusieurs méthodes ont été proposées pour résoudre ce problème, mais elles requièrent de nombreux paramètre d'entrée, pour la plupart difficiles ou impossibles à ajuster à un sujet spécifique. Ces méthodes vont être décrites et leurs limites soulignées. Quoi qu'il en soit, de nouveaux développements sont nécessaires avant que les forces musculo-tendineuses prédites par les modèles puissent être utilisées dans le cadre d'applications cliniques.

The prediction of musculo-tendon forces developed during daily living tasks is essential to assess movement control and joint contact forces, and then provide insight to improve diagnosis and treatment follow-up of neurological and orthopedic disorders. Direct measurement of the musculo-tendon forces is hardly possible and the redundancy inherent in the musculo-skeletal system yields not enough equilibrium equations to compute these forces. Different methods have been proposed to overcome this problem, requiring numerous input parameters, most of them difficult or impossible to adjust to a specific subject. These methods will be exposed and their limits pointed out. Anyway, further development is needed in order that the model-based prediction of musculo-tendon forces can be used for clinical purposes.; La prédiction des forces musculo-tendineuses développées au cours des tâches de la vie courante est essentielle pour accéder au contrôle du mouvement et aux actions de contact articulaires, et permet d'améliorer le diagnostic et le suivi du traitement des désordres neurologiques et orthopédiques. La mesure directe des forces musculo-tendineuses est difficilement réalisable et la redondance inhérente au système musculo-squelettique induit un nombre d'équations d'équilibre insuffisant pour calculer ces forces. Plusieurs méthodes ont été proposées pour résoudre ce problème, mais elles requièrent de nombreux paramètre d'entrée, pour la plupart difficiles ou impossibles à ajuster à un sujet spécifique. Ces méthodes vont être décrites et leurs limites soulignées. Quoi qu'il en soit, de nouveaux développements sont nécessaires avant que les forces musculo-tendineuses prédites par les modèles puissent être utilisées dans le cadre d'applications cliniques.

Total knee replacement (TKR) is one of the most performed orthopedic surgeries to treat knee joint diseases in the elderly population. Although the survivorship of knee implants may extend beyond two decades, the poor outcome rate remains considerable. A recent computational approach used to better understand failure modes and improve TKR outcomes is based on the combination of musculoskeletal (MSK) and finite element models. This combined multiscale modeling approach is a promising strategy in the field of computational biomechanics; however, some critical aspects need to be investigated. In particular, the identification and quantification of the uncertainties related to the boundary conditions used as inputs to the finite element model due to a different definition of the MSK model are crucial. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate this problem, which is relevant for the model credibility assessment process. Three different generic MSK models available in the OpenSim platform were used to simulate gait, based on the experimental data from the fifth edition of the “Grand Challenge Competitions to Predictin vivoKnee Loads.” The outputs of the MSK analyses were compared in terms of relative kinematics of the knee implant components and joint reaction (JR) forces and moments acting on the tibial insert. Additionally, the estimated knee JRs were compared with those measured by the instrumented knee implant so that the “global goodness of fit” was quantified for each model. Our results indicated that the different kinematic definitions of the knee joint and the muscle model implemented in the different MSK models influenced both the motion and the load history of the artificial joint. This study demonstrates the importance of examining the influence of the model assumptions on the output results and represents the first step for future studies that will investigate how the uncertainties in the MSK models propagate on disease-specific finite element model results.