1. Should we still use motor vehicle intrusion as a sole triage criterion for the use of trauma center resources?
- Author
-
Demetrios Demetriades, Kazuhide Matsushima, Catherine Preston, Deidre Gorospe, Konstantinos Chouliaras, and William Koenig
- Subjects
Emergency Medical Services ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Poison control ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,Injury Severity Score ,0302 clinical medicine ,Trauma Centers ,law ,Emergency medical services ,Humans ,Medicine ,Glasgow Coma Scale ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Retrospective Studies ,General Environmental Science ,business.industry ,Trauma center ,Accidents, Traffic ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Retrospective cohort study ,medicine.disease ,Intensive care unit ,Triage ,United States ,Hospitalization ,Intensive Care Units ,Logistic Models ,Practice Guidelines as Topic ,Emergency medicine ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,Medical emergency ,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S ,business ,Automobiles - Abstract
Motor vehicle intrusion (MVI) is one of the field triage criteria recommended by the American College of Surgeons Committee of Trauma (ACS-COT) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). However, the evidence supporting its validity is scarce. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of this criterion and assess its impact on overtriage or undertriage.This was a retrospective study based on the Los Angeles County Trauma and Emergency Medicine Information System (TEMIS) Trauma database. Included in the analysis were patients with MVI as the sole criterion for trauma center triage. Physiological characteristics, severity of injury, and outcomes of the MVI patients were compared between different age groups. Further, a logistic regression model was used to identify factors significantly associated with the need for trauma center resources.During the period 2002-2012, a total of 10,554 trauma patients involved in motor vehicle crashes had documentation of MVI. A subgroup of 3998 patients (37.9%) did not meet any other criteria that require immediate transportation to a designated trauma center. Only 0.7% of these patients had hypotension and 0.1% had deterioration of the Glasgow Coma Scale on admission to the emergency room. Overall, 18.8% of patients required trauma center resources defined as intubation in the emergency room, certain surgical procedures, in-hospital death, or intensive care unit admission. Age ≥65 years, male gender, prehospital heart rate100/min, and systolic blood pressure110 mmHg were significantly associated with the need for trauma center resources.The MVI itself did not appear to be a strong indicator for the use of trauma center resources and is associated with excessive overtriage. However, age65 years, systolic blood pressure110 mmHg, and heart rate100/min were significant predictors for the need of trauma center resources. The MVI criterion should be refined for better utilization of trauma center resources.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF