Search

Summary Background Indatuximab ravtansine (BT062) is an antibody-drug conjugate that binds to CD138 and synergistically enhances the antitumor activity of lenalidomide in preclinical models of multiple myeloma. This phase 1/2a study was done to determine the safety, activity, and pharmacokinetics of indatuximab ravtansine in combination with immunomodulatory drugs in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Methods This open-label, phase 1/2a study took place at nine hospital sites in the USA. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, and ECOG performance status or Zubrod score of 2 or below. Patients who received indatuximab ravtansine with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (indatuximab ravtansine plus lenalidomide) had failure of at least one previous therapy. Patients treated with indatuximab ravtansine with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (indatuximab ravtansine plus pomalidomide) had failure of at least two previous therapies (including lenalidomide and bortezomib) and had progressive disease on or within 60 days of completion of their last treatment. In phase 1, patients received indatuximab ravtansine intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle in escalating dose levels of 80 mg/m2, 100 mg/m2, and 120 mg/m2, with lenalidomide (25 mg; days 1 to 21 every 28 days orally) and dexamethasone (20–40 mg; days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 28 days). In phase 2, the recommended phase 2 dose of indatuximab ravtansine was given to an expanded cohort of patients in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. The protocol was amended to allow additional patients to be treated with indatuximab ravtansine plus pomalidomide (4 mg; days 1 to 21 every 28 days orally) and dexamethasone, in a more heavily pretreated patient population than in the indatuximab ravtansine plus lenalidomide group. The phase 1 primary endpoint was to determine the dose-limiting toxicities and the maximum tolerated dose (recommended phase 2 dose) of indatuximab ravtansine, and the phase 2 primary endpoint was to describe the objective response rate (ORR; partial response or better) and clinical benefit response (ORR plus minor response). All patients were analysed for safety and all patients with post-treatment response assessments were analysed for activity. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01638936 , and is complete. Findings 64 (86%) of 74 screened patients were enrolled between July 3, 2012, and June 30, 2015. 47 (73%) patients received indatuximab ravtansine plus lenalidomide (median follow-up 24·2 months [IQR 19·9–45·4]) and 17 (27%) received indatuximab ravtansine plus pomalidomide (24·1 months [17·7–36·7]). The maximum tolerated dose of indatuximab ravtansine plus lenalidomide was 100 mg/m2, and defined as the recommended phase 2 dose for indatuximab ravtansine plus pomalidomide. An objective response for indatuximab ravtansine plus lenalidomide was observed in 33 (71·7%) of 46 patients and in 12 (70·6%) of 17 patients in the indatuximab ravtansine plus pomalidomide group. The clinical benefit response for indatuximab ravtansine plus lenalidomide was 85% (39 of 46 patients) and for indatuximab ravtansine plus pomalidomide it was 88% (15 of 17 patients). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events in both groups were neutropenia (14 [22%] of 64 patients), anaemia (10 [16%]), and thrombocytopenia (seven [11%]). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) that led to discontinuation occurred in 35 (55%) of the 64 patients. Five (8%) patients with a TEAE had a fatal outcome; none was reported as related to indatuximab ravtansine. Interpretation Indatuximab ravtansine in combination with immunomodulatory drugs shows preliminary antitumor activity, is tolerated, and could be further evaluated in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Funding Biotest AG.

Die Pferdegestutzte Biografiearbeit ist ein praventives Konzept, welches sich aus Elementen der Pferdegestutzten Interventionen und der Biografiearbeit zusammensetzt. Durch den strukturierten Ruckblick auf die eigene Lebensgeschichte konnen individuelle Ressourcen wahrgenommen und fur die weitere Zukunftsgestaltung genutzt werden. Die Entwicklungsphasen der einzelnen Lebensabschnitte werden dabei mit spezifischen Aufgaben unter Einbezug des Pferdes herausgearbeitet. Zur Belegung der Wirksamkeit wurden wissenschaftlich fundierte Studien initiiert. Durch den Nachweis des positiven Nutzens der Pferdegestutzten Biografiearbeit kann perspektivisch das Angebotsspektrum fur die reittherapeutische Praxis erweitert werden.

Background Equine-assisted therapy is more often practiced with children and adolescents than with the elderly, although individuals in the second half of life could also profit from it. This group, from the age of 50, is characterised by increasing emotional, social, health-related and cognitive changes; a critical life event, such as a neurological illness or loss of a family member, can increase the likelihood of subclinical depression. Individuals who exhibit depressive symptoms not necessarily diagnosed with a major depression may suffer from relevant losses of quality of life (e.g. sleep disorders, memory disorders, feelings of guilt, hopelessness). Despite the fact that the various healthcare systems are in general more frequently used, such individuals often do not receive adequate therapy. The processing of one’s biography (reminiscence) is an elementary component of most psychotherapy approaches and has been demonstrated to treat and prevent the development of major depression. In this study, equine-assisted biographical work (EABW), a combination of equine-assisted therapy and biographical work, will be applied with individuals with subclinical depression in the second half of their life. Methods This is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled and open phase III study in enrolling participants with subclinical depression. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether a preventive, equine-assisted, age-specific treatment combining elements of equine-assisted intervention with those of biographical work offers better treatment potentials in comparison to a control group with no intervention. Study participants in the intervention group will receive weekly equine-assisted biographical work over a period of 8 weeks. The primary endpoint is the change in Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) in a pre-post comparison. Secondary endpoints include other health-related questionnaires including quality of life, reminiscence functions and anxiety. Discussion The present study is the first randomised study examining the efficacy of biographical work with a horse and has the potential to establish an empirically based treatment for individuals in the second half of life and improving the symptoms of subclinical depression. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00017010 . Registered on 01 April 2019

Activation of the complement system is important for efficient clearance of a wide variety of pathogens via opsonophagocytosis, or by direct lysis via complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). However, in severe infections dysregulation of the complement system contributes to hyperinflammation. The influence of the novel IgM/IgA-enriched immunoglobulin preparation trimodulin on the complement pathway was investigated in in vitro opsonophagocytosis, binding and CDC assays. Immunoglobulin levels before and after trimodulin treatment were placed in relation to complement assessments in humans. In vitro, trimodulin activates complement and induces opsonophagocytosis, but also interacts with opsonins C3b, C4b and anaphylatoxin C5a in a concentration-dependent manner. This was not observed for standard intravenous IgG preparation (IVIg). Accordingly, trimodulin, but not IVIg, inhibited the downstream CDC pathway and target cell lysis. If applied at a similar concentration range in healthy subjects, trimodulin treatment resulted in C3 and C4 consumption in a concentration-dependent manner, which was extended in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. Complement consumption is found to be dependent on underlying immunoglobulin levels, particularly IgM, pinpointing their regulative function in humans. IgM/IgA provide a balancing effect on the complement system. Trimodulin may enhance phagocytosis and opsonophagocytosis in patients with severe infections and prevent excessive pathogen lysis and release of harmful anaphylatoxins.

Background Indatuximab ravtansine (BT062) is an antibody-drug conjugate that binds to CD138, which is overexpressed on multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Patients and Methods We report from 2 clinical studies of patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM previously treated with an immunomodulatory drug and a proteasome inhibitor. Single- and multi-dosing schedules were investigated to define dose-limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose, and to describe safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics. Results In the first-in-human study, indatuximab ravtansine was administered to 32 patients on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The MTD was 160 mg/m2. In the phase I/IIa study, indatuximab ravtansine was administered to 35 patients on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle, and the MTD/recommended phase II dose was 140 mg/m2. Most (88%) adverse events were grade 1 or 2, the most common being diarrhea and fatigue. There was rapid clearance of indatuximab ravtansine and no relevant accumulation. Over 75% of heavily pretreated patients achieved stable disease or better. With the multi-dose schedule, minor and partial responses occurred in 14.7% of patients, the median time to progression was 3 months, and the median overall survival was 26.7 months. Conclusion Our data support further investigation of indatuximab ravtansine as part of a combination regimen for relapsed and/or refractory MM.

Introduction: Nonrandomized studies support the potential of cytomegalovirus hyperimmunoglobulin (CMV-HyperIg) in preventing maternofetal CMV transmission, but prospective interventional studies show equivocal results. We pre­sent a prospective phase-III international randomized open-label trial on the potential effect of CMV-HyperIg following serial monitoring of CMV serostatus. Methods: CMV-seronegative pregnant women (gestational age [GA] Results: The treatment arm counted 4,800 randomized subjects: 52 seroconverted (median GA 24 [11–35] weeks), of which 45 completed follow-up. The control arm counted 4,735 randomized subjects: 42 seroconverted, of which 34 completed follow-up (evaluable data for 28 newborns) and 8 subjects chose off-label Cytotect®. Congenital CMV rates were 13/28 newborns (46.4% [CI 27.51; 66.13]) vs. 16/45 newborns (35.6% [CI 21.87; 51.22]) in control and treated arms, respectively (p = 0.46). Newborn CMV disease was mostly mild and spontaneously resolving. There were no major safety concerns. The target sample was not reached within an acceptable time frame. Conclusions: Serial monitoring of CMV serostatus with CMV-HyperIg treatment was associated with a mild nonsignificant reduction in the vertical CMV transmission rate. Studies on the optimal preventive strategy are hampered by epidemiological and ethical challenges and should focus on GA-dependent transmission rates and accurate dating of infection.

Purpose: The CIGMA study investigated a novel human polyclonal antibody preparation (trimodulin) containing ~ 23% immunoglobulin (Ig) M, ~ 21% IgA, and ~ 56% IgG as add-on therapy for patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP). Methods: In this double-blind, phase II study (NCT01420744), 160 patients with sCAP requiring invasive mechanical ventilation were randomized (1:1) to trimodulin (42 mg IgM/kg/day) or placebo for five consecutive days. Primary endpoint was ventilator-free days (VFDs). Secondary endpoints included 28-day all-cause and pneumonia-related mortality. Safety and tolerability were monitored. Exploratory post hoc analyses were performed in subsets stratified by baseline C-reactive protein (CRP; ≥ 70 mg/L) and/or IgM (≤ 0.8 g/L). Results: Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in VFDs between trimodulin (mean 11.0, median 11 [n = 81]) and placebo (mean 9.6; median 8 [n = 79]; p = 0.173). Twenty-eight-day all-cause mortality was 22.2% vs. 27.8%, respectively (p = 0.465). Time to discharge from intensive care unit and mean duration of hospitalization were comparable between groups. Adverse-event incidences were comparable. Post hoc subset analyses, which included the majority of patients (58–78%), showed significant reductions in all-cause mortality (trimodulin vs. placebo) in patients with high CRP, low IgM, and high CRP/low IgM at baseline. Conclusions: No significant differences were found in VFDs and mortality between trimodulin and placebo groups. Post hoc analyses supported improved outcome regarding mortality with trimodulin in subsets of patients with elevated CRP, reduced IgM, or both. These findings warrant further investigation. Trial registration: NCT01420744., 0, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy, biological activity and safety of tregalizumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX).Methods321 patients were randomised (1:1:1:1) to placebo or tregalizumab 25, 100 or 200 mg once-weekly subcutaneously in addition to MTX treatment. Responders at week 12 continued the same treatment, and non-responders at week 12 were escalated to the next higher tregalizumab dose level or re-randomised from placebo to active treatment. After 24 weeks, patients could continue treatment with tregalizumab for 24 weeks (extension phase). The primary endpoint was the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) response rate at week 12. Safety and biological activity were monitored through week 48.ResultsAt week 12, ACR20 response rates were not statistically significantly different between placebo and any of the tregalizumab doses. Tregalizumab injections were well tolerated; most adverse events were mild to moderate and comparable among treatment and placebo groups. Biological activity was shown by dose-dependent CD4 downmodulation.ConclusionTreatment with tregalizumab did not show significant clinical efficacy in patients with active RA compared with placebo but resulted in the expected biological effect on CD4 modulation. Tregalizumab was generally well tolerated, and no new safety findings were identified.Trial registration numberNCT01999192; Results.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, biological activity and safety of tregalizumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Methods: 321 patients were randomised (1:1:1:1) to placebo or tregalizumab 25, 100 or 200 mg once-weekly subcutaneously in addition to MTX treatment. Responders at week 12 continued the same treatment, and non-responders at week 12 were escalated to the next higher tregalizumab dose level or re-randomised from placebo to active treatment. After 24 weeks, patients could continue treatment with tregalizumab for 24 weeks (extension phase). The primary endpoint was the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) response rate at week 12. Safety and biological activity were monitored through week 48. Results: At week 12, ACR20 response rates were not statistically significantly different between placebo and any of the tregalizumab doses. Tregalizumab injections were well tolerated; most adverse events were mild to moderate and comparable among treatment and placebo groups. Biological activity was shown by dose-dependent CD4 downmodulation. Conclusion: Treatment with tregalizumab did not show significant clinical efficacy in patients with active RA compared with placebo but resulted in the expected biological effect on CD4 modulation. Tregalizumab was generally well tolerated, and no new safety findings were identified.

Background and Objectives Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of escalating infusion rates of BT090, a 10% intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), were studied in patients with primary immunodeficiency disease. Materials and Methods In Part A, patients (n = 30) received 3 infusions of BT090 at their pretrial dose and dosing interval; the infusion rate of BT090 was increased from 0·3 to 1·4 to 2·0 ml/kg/h for each infusion in each patient initially at 30-min intervals. Pharmacokinetics was evaluated at the 3rd infusion (n = 24). At the 4th infusion, infusion rates were to be gradually escalated from 0·3 to 1·4 to 4·0 to a maximum of 8·0 ml/kg/h initially at 30-min intervals to establish the maximum tolerated infusion rate per patient. Results The pharmacokinetic characteristics and safety profile of BT090 were comparable with those of other IVIgs, including Intratect®. Escalation of infusion rates was well tolerated, allowing identification of individual patient's maximum tolerated infusion rate. At subsequent infusions, all patients tolerated their individually defined maximum infusion rate: 17 patients (68·0%) tolerated infusion rates of 6·0 or 8·0 ml/kg/h and four patients (16%) had maximum tolerated infusion rates of

BACKGROUND Subcutaneous self-administration of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) prophylaxis is preferred by patients, but compliance with the assigned regimen in routine practice is undocumented. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective, observational, 18-week, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study assessed compliance and tolerability in maintenance liver transplant patients self-administering subcutaneous HBIg at home according to local practice. RESULTS Sixty-one patients were analyzed (median follow-up 18 weeks, range 14.0-27.9 weeks), with 961/1006 injections (95.5%) administered at home during the study. Other than in 4 patients, HBIg was prescribed for weekly administration (500 IU/L, n=39; 1000 IU/L, n=18) at study entry. Eighteen patients (29.5%) were assigned a dose lower than recommended in the Summary of Product Characteristics. The primary variable of compliance failure, defined as ≥ 1 hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) serum trough level

Background/Purpose: In autoimmune diseases reduced numbers and functional impairment of regulatory T cells (Tregs) have been observed (1). Tregalizumab (BT-061) is a humanized, anti-CD4 mAb, inducing selective Treg activation in vitro. Previous trials suggested efficacy in RA at doses >25 mg subcutaneously (SC). In a population PK/PD analysis, down-modulation of CD4 expression was identified as a biomarker to monitor CD4 target engagement in humans. Methods: This two-part, Phase 2b randomized controlled trial (RCT) included subjects with active RA for >6 months despite MTX (>15mg/wk), with >6/28 TJC, >6/28 SJC and elevated CRP or ESR. Subjects were randomized to receive 25 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, or PBO once-weekly SC injection + MTX over 24 wks. Primary endpoint was ACR20 at wk 12. At wk 12 (end of Main part I), non-responders were re-randomized to active treatment or higher doses. Subjects responding at wk 24 (end of Main part II) could extend treatment for an additional 24 wks. A data safety monitoring board (DSMB) was established for safety evaluation throughout the study. Results: Of 321 subjects enrolled from Europe, USA, Canada, Russia and Mexico, 37 (11.5%) withdrew at < wk 12. Demographics and baseline disease characteristics were well balanced across groups: mean SJC and TJC 16 and 24, respectively; CRP 11.7 mg/L, DAS (ESR) 6.58 and HAQ-DI 1.56. ACR20 responders at wk 12 (42.3%/47%/44.3% vs. 35.2% in 25 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg groups and PBO, respectively), ACR20 responders at wk 24 and secondary endpoints did not differ significantly between tregalizumab groups and PBO. However, dose dependent modulation of CD4 expression on T cells occurred rapidly with BT-061 treatment, as predicted from previous analyses. Through wk 12, TEAE (39.4% and 37.5%) and serious TEAEs rates (2.1% and 1.3%) were similar between BT-061 and PBO. For responder at wk 24, TEAEs (48.3% and 52.3%) were similar between BT-061 and PBO. Serious TEAEs were only reported in BT-061 treated subjects (2%). Three deaths occurred considered unrelated to treatment (car accident, acute coronary syndrome, death of unknown cause in a war area). There was no difference in infections between tregalizumab and PBO. One serious infection (peritonitis) occurred at wk 22 in the 25 mg dose group. Apart from acute coronary syndrome with fatal outcome, no further MACE events, Tuberculosis, opportunistic infections nor malignancies were reported. Conclusion: No tested doses of tregalizumab demonstrated significant efficacy improving signs and symptoms of active RA based on ACR20 responses at wk 12 and 24 despite dose dependent down-modulation of CD4 expression. Tregalizumab was generally well tolerated.

Erratum to: J Clin Immunol DOI 10.1007/s10875–017-0381-y The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The family name of Andrea Wartenberg-Demand was misspelled as Watenberg-Demand. The original article was corrected.

Background: BT062 (Biotest AG, Dreieich, Germany) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) comprising a CD138-binding chimerized antibody and the cytotoxic maytansinoid, DM4. It is designed to target and kill CD138-positive cancer cells. CD138 (Syndecan-1) is highly expressed on a number of solid tumors and hematological malignancies and is one of the most reliable markers for multiple myeloma (MM) cells. BT062 was previously evaluated as a monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory MM and found to have an acceptable tolerability profile with preliminary evidence of activity (Heffner et al, Blood. 2012; 120: Abstract 4042). Phase I/IIa testing was initiated with BT062 in combination with lenalidomide (Len) and low-dose dexamethasone (dex). The combination was well tolerated at BT062 doses up to 100 mg/m², defined to be the recommended Phase 2 dose (RPTD), and induced meaningful responses, including in patients previously treated with both Len and bortezomib (Bort) (Kelly et al, Blood. 2014; 124: Abstract 4736). Based on these promising results, further investigation of BT062 in combination with pomalidomide (Pom) and dex was initiated in patients with prior Len and Bort exposure, a patient population known to have a poor outcome. Objectives: To evaluate the safety and activity of BT062 (on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 4-week cycle) used in combination with dex (20-40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) and Len (25 mg, daily on days 1-21) or Pom (4 mg, daily on days 1-21) in patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Methods: This is a prospective, open label, multicenter Phase I/IIa study. The RPTD of BT062 in combination with Len/dex was defined to be 100 mg/m², and 38 patients were treated with BT062/Len/dex at the BT062 RPTD. An additional 17 patients were treated with BT062/Pom/dex at the BT062 RPTD. Patients aged ≥18 years with relapsed/refractory MM were eligible to participate. Prior treatment with Len, Pom, and/or dexamethasone (any dose) was allowed. To qualify for treatment with BT062/Len/dex at the BT062 RPTD, patients must have received at least one but no more than six prior therapies.To qualify for treatment with BT062/Pom/dex, patients must have received at least two prior therapies, including both Len and Bort, and progressed on or within 60 days of completion of their last therapy, with no limit on number of prior therapies. Patients with clinical response (or no evidence of disease progression) without unacceptable toxicities were eligible to receive additional treatment cycles. Toxicities were assessed by CTCAE v4. Clinical response was assessed by the investigator according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Results: Sixty-four patients have received BT062 in combination with dex and Len or Pom in this ongoing study. The combinations have been generally well tolerated, with approximately 90% of adverse events (AEs) reported CTC grade 1 or 2. The most common AEs reported are diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea. Forty-seven patients have received BT062 with Len/Dex (3 at 80 mg/m², 38 at 100 mg/m², 6 at 120 mg/m²), with 8 patients still on treatment. Among these 47 patients, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.4 months. Forty-three patients completed at least two treatment cycles and were evaluable for response. Of these patients 33 achieved a partial response (PR) or better, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 77% and a median duration of response (DOR) of 21.0 months. Thirteen of the evaluable BT062/Len/dex-treated patients had prior exposure to both Len and Bort and progressed on or within 60 days of their last therapy. ORR was 54% among these patients, including 1 complete response (CR), 4 very good partial responses (VGPR) and 2 PRs. Seventeen patients were treated with BT062/Pom/dex, all had prior exposure to both Len and Bort and progressed on or within 60 days of their last therapy. ORR was 79%, with 4 VGPR and 7 PR among the 14 patients evaluable for efficacy. Median PFS has not been reached after 7.5 months median follow up, with 7 patients still on treatment. Updated safety and activity data will be presented. Conclusion: BT062 has been found to be well tolerated when used in combination with Len/dex or Pom/dex, with encouraging activity even in patients with Len- and Bort-pretreated disease progressing on or within 60 days of completion of their last therapy. Disclosures Kelly: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria. Somlo:Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Heffner:Millennium: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Madan:Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Lonial:Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Barmaki-Rad:Biotest AG: Employment. Rühle:Biotest AG: Employment. Herrmann:Biotest AG: Employment. Wartenberg-Demand:Biotest AG: Employment. Haeder:Biotest AG: Employment. Anderson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoprep: Equity Ownership; Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoprep: Equity Ownership; Millennuim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennuim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sleep disturbance is a major feature of patients with anxiety disorders and depression. Neurapas® balance is a triple herbal combination of extracts of St. John's wort (dry extract (DE) 60mg), valerian (DE 28mg) and passiflora (DE 32mg) that is widely used for treating minor depression in Germany. We tested the effect of Neurapas® balance on mood, sleep-EEG and cognitive performance in order to evaluate its central nervous effects in humans. 20 healthy subjects were examined twice in a double-blind, randomized completely balanced cross-over design and received either placebo or Neurapas® balance (3 days 3×2 tabl.). The dependent variables were sleep-EEG parameters, mood (BSKE) and vegetative symptoms (MSKL) and cognitive performance (TAP, ZVT, d2). Neurapas® balance significantly (compared to placebo) improved sleep continuity with a reduction of wakefulness. Non-REM-sleep was reduced in the first and significantly increased in the second sleep cycle and REM-latency was reduced. A positive trend was observed in regard to mental agitation and melancholy of the BSKE and hand-trembling and hand-moisture of the MSKL. No significant differences between Neurapas® balance and placebo were found in the cognitive performance tests. These findings show that Neurapas® balance has central nervous effects as reflected by changes in sleep EEG. It improves sleep continuity and subjective mood without negative effects on cognitive performance. The neurophysiological effects of Neurapas® balance® on the brain and the improved mood of the healthy volunteers is consistent with it having therapeutic effects in anxiety and depression with accompanying insomnia. Acknowledgement: This study was supported by Pascoe Pharmaceutische Preparations GmbH, Germany.

We optimized the novel technique of multielectrode neurochip recordings for the rapid and efficient screening of neuroactivity. Changes in the spontaneous activity of cultured networks of primary cortical neurons were quantified to evaluate the action of drugs on the firing dynamics of complex network activity. The multiparametric assessment of electrical activity changes caused by psychoactive herbal extracts from Hypericum, Passiflora and Valeriana, and various combinations thereof revealed a receptor-specific and concentration-dependent inhibition of the firing patterns. The spike and burst rates showed significant substance-dependent effects and significant differences in potency. The effects of specific receptor blockades on the inhibitory responses provided evidence that the herbal extracts act on gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) and serotonin (5-HT) receptors, which are recognized targets of pharmacological antidepressant treatment. A biphasic effect, serotonergic stimulation of activity at low concentrations that is overridden by GABAergic inhibition at higher concentrations, is apparent with Hypericum alone and the triple combination of the extracts. The more potent neuroactivity of the triple combination compared to Hypericum alone and the additive effect of Passiflora and Valeriana suggest a synergy between constituent herbal extracts. The extracts and their combinations affected the set of derived activity parameters in a concomitant manner suggesting that all three constituent extracts and their combinations have largely similar modes of action. This study also demonstrates the sensitivity, selectivity and robustness of neurochip recordings for high content screening of complex mixtures of neuroactive substances and for providing multiparametric information on neuronal activity changes to assess the therapeutic potential of psychoactive substances.

Background: BT062 (Biotest AG Dreieich, Germany) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), comprising the anti-CD138 chimerized MAb (nBT062) and the maytansinoid DM4 as a cytotoxic agent. It is designed to bind to CD138 on cancer cells, and then release DM4 after internalization to cause cell death. CD138 (Syndecan-1) is highly overexpressed on various solid tumors and in hematological malignancies, and represents one of the most specific target antigens for identification of multiple myeloma (MM) cells. BT062 was investigated as a single agent and found to have an acceptable tolerability profile and evidence of activity in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed and/or refractory MM (1). Preclinical studies showed enhanced anti-MM activity when BT062 was combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Len/Dex). Based on these data, a Phase I/IIa study in MM was initiated to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BT062 in combination with Len/Dex. Objectives: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended phase II dose (RPTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-MM activity of increasing doses of BT062 (days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks) used in combination with Len (25 mg, daily on days 1-21) and low dose Dex (40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Methods: This is a prospective, open label, multicenter Phase I/IIa study. The Phase I part includes dose escalation, and the Phase IIa the expansion of the RPTD cohort. Patients aged ≥18 years with relapsed and/or refractory MM who have failed at least one prior therapy were eligible to participate. Prior treatment with Len and/or Dex was allowed. Patients with clinical response (or no evidence of progressive disease) and without unacceptable toxicities were eligible for additional treatment cycles. Patients were enrolled in cohorts of at least 3 at each dose level; DLT in the first cycle triggered cohort expansion. Toxicities were assessed by CTCAE v4 and clinical response was assessed according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Results: The maximum administered dose (MAD) was 120 mg/m². Two of six patients treated at this dose had a DLT: mucosal inflammation (CTC grade 3) and anemia (CTC grade 3). The MTD was defined as 100 mg/m² and selected as RPTD. Additional patients are being treated at this RPTD to further evaluate safety and efficacy. Enrollment into the study is ongoing. As of July 2014, a total of 45 patients had received BT062 at dose levels of 80 mg/m² (N=3), 100 mg/m² (N=36) or 120 mg/m² (N=6). Fifteen patients discontinued study treatment: 5 for disease progression, 7 for adverse events, 1 died (not treatment related) and 2 for withdrawal of consent. The other 30 patients remain on treatment. The median treatment duration was 123 days (range 1–597). The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1–11). 68% of patients had prior exposure to both Len and bortezomib, 73% of patients had prior Len exposure, and 30% were Len-refractory. According to preliminary data from this ongoing study, about 89% of reported Adverse Events (AEs) were CTC grade 1 or 2. The most common reported AEs were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and hypokalemia. Amongst the 36 patients across all dose levels currently evaluable for efficacy, the overall response rate (ORR) is 78%; including 1 stringent complete response, 2 complete responses, 10 very good partial responses, and 15 partial responses. Two patients achieved a minor response and 6 patients disease stabilization, resulting in a clinical benefit in 100% of the evaluable patients. The ORR was 83% among the 30 evaluable patients receiving the RPTD. Interestingly, the ORR was 70% among the 23 patients with prior exposure to Len and bortezomib, and among 10 patients refractory to prior treatment with Len. Conclusion: Preliminary data from this ongoing study indicate that BT062 is well tolerated in combination with Len/Dex at dose levels that induce responses in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma, including patients with prior exposure to both Len and bortezomib and patients refractory to prior treatment with Len. Updated results on safety and efficacy will be presented. References Heffner et al, BT062, an Antibody-Drug Conjugate Directed Against CD138, Given Weekly for 3 Weeks in Each 4 Week Cycle: Safety and Further Evidence of Clinical Activity. Blood. 2012; 120: Abstract 4042. Disclosures Kelly: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Heffner:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Research Funding; Dana Farber CI: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Idera: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Talon Therapeutics: Research Funding. Somlo:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Munshi:Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; Ocopep: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Jagannath:Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ailawadhi:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria. Barmaki-Rad:Biotest AG: Employment. Chavan:Biotest Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Patel:Biotest Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Wartenberg-Demand:Biotest AG: Employment. Haeder:Biotest AG: Employment. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopep: Equity Ownership; Acetylon: Equity Ownership.

Background BT062 (Biotest AG Dreieich, Germany) is an antibody-drug conjugate, comprising the anti-CD138 chimerized MAb (nBT062) and the maytansinoid DM4 as cytotoxic agent. Once bound to CD138 on a target cell, the conjugate is internalized and releases DM4, leading to target cell death. CD138 (Syndecan-1) is highly overexpressed on various solid tumors and in hematological malignancies, and represents one of the most specific target antigens for identification of multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Data from two studies investigating BT062 as single agent demonstrated an acceptable tolerability profile and evidence of clinical activity in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed and/or refractory MM (1, 2). Preclinical studies showed enhanced anti-MM activity when BT062 was combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Len/Dex). Based on these data, a Phase I/IIa study in MM was initiated to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BT062 in combination with Len/Dex. Objectives To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended phase II dose (RPTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-MM activity of increasing doses of BT062 (days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks) in combination with Len (25 mg, daily on days 1-21) and low dose Dex (40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Methods This is a prospective, open label, dose-escalation, multicenter Phase I/IIa study. The Phase I part includes dose escalation, and the Phase IIa the expansion of the MTD or RPTD cohort. Patients aged ≥18 years with relapsed and/or refractory MM who have failed at least one prior therapy were eligible to participate. Prior treatment with Len and/or Dex was allowed. Patients with clinical response (or no evidence of progressive disease) and without unacceptable toxicities were eligible for additional treatment cycles. Patients were enrolled in cohorts of at least 3 at each dose level; DLT in the first cycle triggered cohort expansion. Toxicities were assessed by CTCAE v4 and clinical response was assessed according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Results As of July 2013, a total of 15 patients have received BT062 at dose levels of 80 mg/m2 (N=3), 100 mg/m2 (N=6) or 120 mg/m2 (N=6). Two patients at the highest dose level discontinued study due to toxicity (DLT), another patient withdrew consent. The other 12 patients remain on treatment; median duration 144 days (range 8–385). The median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 1–11), 87% of patients had prior Len exposure, and 50% were Len/Dex refractory. The maximum administered dose (MAD) has been reached at 120 mg/m2, with mucosal inflammation (CTC grade 3) as DLT in one, and anemia (CTC grade 3) in a second of the 6 patients treated at this dose level. About 85% of reported Adverse Events (AE) were of CTC grade 1 or 2. The most common reported AEs were fatigue, hypokalemia, and diarrhea. Amongst the 9 patients currently evaluable for efficacy, responses were observed across all dose levels with a overall response rate (ORR) of 78%; including 1 patient with complete response (120 mg/m2), 1 patient with very good partial response (80 mg/m2), and 5 patients with partial response (80 and 100 mg/m2). Two other patients achieved disease stabilization, resulting in a clinical benefit in 100% of the evaluated patients. Interestingly, partial response was observed in 3 patients refractory to prior treatment with Len/Dex. The MTD has been defined as 100 mg/m2 and is currently expanded to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of BT062 at the RPTD. Conclusion Preliminary data from this ongoing study indicate that BT062 is well tolerated in combination with Len/Dex at dose levels that induce responses in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma, including Len/Dex-refractory patients. Updated results on safety and efficacy will be presented. References 1. Jagannath et al, BT062, an Antibody-Drug Conjugate Directed Against CD138, Shows Clinical Activity in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Blood. 2011; 118: Abstract 305. 2. Heffner et al, BT062, an Antibody-Drug Conjugate Directed Against CD138, Given Weekly for 3 Weeks in Each 4 Week Cycle: Safety and Further Evidence of Clinical Activity. Blood. 2012; 120: Abstract 4042. Disclosures: Somlo: Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; NIH: Research Funding; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Heffner:Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Siegel:Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Zimmerman:Celgene: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria. Jagannath:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Munshi:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Ruehle:Biotest AG: Employment. Chavan:Biotest Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Patel:Biotest Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Rothenburger:Biotest AG: Employment. Wartenberg-Demand:Biotest AG: Employment. Haeder:Biotest AG: Employment. Anderson:Gilead: Consultancy; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Oncopep: Equity Ownership.

Abstract 4042 Background: CD138 (Syndecan-1) is highly overexpressed in various solid tumors and hematological malignancies, and represents one of the most specific target antigens for identification of multiple myeloma (MM) cells. BT062 (Biotest AG Dreieich, Germany) is an antibody-drug conjugate, comprised of the anti-CD138 chimerized MAb (nBT062) and the cytotoxic agent DM4. Once bound to CD138 on a target cell, the conjugate is internalized and releases DM4, leading to target cell death. Data from the first in human study (969) of BT062 demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile and evidence of clinical activity in heavily pretreated relapsed and/or refractory MM patients(1). Based on these data, a Phase I/IIa study in MM (975) was initiated to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of BT062 when given more frequently. Objectives: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-MM activity of increasing doses of BT062, when administered on a repeated, multiple dose schedule (Days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks) in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Methods: This is a prospective, open label, dose-escalation, multicenter Phase I/IIa study. The Phase I part includes dose escalation, and the Phase IIa the expansion of the MTD or Recommended Phase II Dose (RPTD) cohort. Patients aged ≥18 years with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM who have failed previous treatment, including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor, were eligible to participate. Patients with clinical response (or no evidence of progressive disease) and without unacceptable toxicities were eligible for further treatment cycles. Patients were enrolled in cohorts of at least 3 at each dose level; DLT in the first cycle triggered cohort expansion. Toxicities were assessed by CTCAE v4 and clinical response was assessed according to the international myeloma working group criteria. Results: A total of 29 patients have been treated with BT062, receiving 1 of the first 8 dose levels ranging from 40 mg/m2 to 160 mg/m2. One out of 6 patients treated at 140 mg/m2 experienced a palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome that was assessed as DLT (SAE, CTC grade 3). Dose was escalated to 160 mg/m2, and 1 of the 2 patients treated experienced an elevation of liver enzymes that was reported as DLT (non-serious, CTC grade 3). Maximum administered dose has not been reached and recruitment into the 160 mg/m2 cohort is ongoing. About 90% of the reported Adverse Events (AE) are grades 1–2. The most frequently reported AEs are anemia, diarrhea, and fatigue. Among the 23 patients evaluable for efficacy, 1 patient achieved a partial response (PR) and has been on study treatment for more than 1 year. Stable disease (SD) for at least 3 months was noted in an additional 11 patients, with median progression free survival of 112 (90–245) days. Thus disease control (PR + SD) was noted in more than 50% (12/23) of patients. The most common reason for discontinuation was disease progression. Preliminary pharmacokinetic results indicate rapid early clearance of BT062 from plasma consistent with rapid delivery and binding of BT062 to the MM cells. No significant accumulation of BT062 was noted, even after the end of the 2nd and 3rd infusions within a cycle. Conclusion: Preliminary data from this ongoing study indicate that BT062 is well tolerated even in this multiple dose schedule and provide further evidence of its clinical activity. Dose escalation is ongoing (now at 160 mg/m2) to define the MTD/RPTD, with cohort expansion then planned to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of BT062 at this dose. Based on the favorable safety profile, a Phase I/IIa study (983) has been initiated to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BT062 in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Disclosures: Heffner: Millennium: Research Funding. Jagannath:Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zimmerman:Novartis: Consultancy; Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Lonial:Onyx: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Merck and Co: Consultancy. Lutz:ImmunoGen, Inc.: Employment. Czeloth:Biotest AG: Employment. Osterroth:Biotest AG: Employment. Ruehle:Biotest AG: Employment. Beelitz:Biotest Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Wartenberg-Demand:Biotest AG: Employment. Haeder:Biotest AG: Employment. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Acetylon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopep: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Munshi:Oncopep: Patents & Royalties; Merck: Consultancy; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract 305 Background: CD138 (Syndecan-1) is highly overexpressed in various solid tumors and hematological malignancies and represents one of the most specific target antigens for identification of multiple myeloma (MM) cells. BT062 (Biotest AG Dreieich, Germany) is an antibody-drug conjugate, comprised of the anti-CD138 chimerized MAb (nBT062) and the cytotoxic agent DM4. Once bound to CD138 on a target cell, the conjugate is internalized and releases DM4, leading to target cell death. We performed the first in man study (969) to investigate safety and efficacy of BT062 in MM. Objectives: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetics (PK) and anti-MM activity of increasing doses of BT062 on a repeated single dose schedule once every three weeks in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Methods: This is a prospective, open label, dose-escalation, multicenter phase I study. Patients aged ≥18 years with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM who have failed previous treatments including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor were eligible to participate. Patients with clinical response (or no evidence of progressive disease) and without unacceptable toxicities were eligible for further treatment cycles. Patients were enrolled in cohorts of 3 at each dose level, with DLT in the first cycle triggering cohort expansion. Toxicities were assessed by CTCAE v3 and clinical response was assessed according to the international myeloma working group criteria. Results: A total of 32 patients have been treated with BT062, receiving one of 7 dose levels ranging from 10 mg/m2 to 200 mg/m2. Maximum administered dose has been defined at 200 mg/m2, with mucositis as the dose limiting toxicity (CTC grade III in 2 of the 3 patients in this cohort). Thirteen of 32 patients have been treated in an expanded MTD-cohort at 160 mg/m2. The most frequently reported adverse events to date are mild to moderate and cover primarily events expected for the underlying disease and patient group. A few adverse events have also been observed involving skin and/or mucosa (tissues of epithelial origin with CD138 expressing cells), as well as the eye. CTC grade II/III toxicity involving skin and/or mucosa (e.g. mucositis, stomatitis, hand/foot syndrome) has been observed mainly at the dose levels 160 mg/m2 or higher. Adverse events involving the eye (e.g. blurred vision, dry eye) have also been reported mainly in patients at the dose levels 160 mg/m2 or higher, all restricted to CTC grade I/II. Among the 27 evaluable patients, 3 patients responded including 1 partial response and 2 minor responses, with one patient (minor response) remaining on treatment for more than a year. Stabilization of disease was noted in an additional 11 patients, receiving a median of 5 cycles of therapy (range of 4–10). Thus stable disease or better was noted in 52% of patients. Most patients came off study due to disease progression. Conclusion: Preliminary data from this study demonstrate an acceptable toxicity profile of BT062. Even in this phase I patient population, evidence of clinical activity was observed. Based on the favourable safety profile, the pharmacokinetic data and early signs of clinical activity, a Phase I/IIa study in MM (975) is initiated to further evaluate the safety and anti-MM efficacy of BT062 in a more frequent dosing regimen. To date 13 patients have been treated with BT062 on the intensified multi-dose regimen, receiving one of the first four dose levels. Updated results on safety, PK and anti-MM efficacy of BT062 will be presented. Disclosures: Jagannath: Celgene: Honoraria; Millennium/Takeda Pharma: Honoraria; J&J Family: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria. Heffner:Millennium: Research Funding. Avigan:Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Curetec: Research Funding. Lutz:ImmunoGen, Inc.: Employment. Engling:Biotest AG: Employment. Uherek:Biotest AG: Employment. Osterroth:Biotest AG: Employment. Ruehle:Biotest AG: Employment. Beelitz:Biotest Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Niemann:Biotest AG: Employment. Wartenberg-Demand:Biotest AG: Employment. Haeder:Biotest AG: Employment. Anderson:Merck: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Actelion: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Munshi:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract 3060 Background: CD138 represents one of the most reliable target antigens for identification of multiple myeloma (MM) cells and has been reported to be a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic marker of MM. BT062 (Biotest AG Dreieich, Germany) is an antibody-drug conjugate, comprised of the anti-CD138 chimerized MAb (nBT062) and the cytotoxic agent DM4. Once bound to CD138 on a target cell, the conjugate is internalized and releases DM4, leading to targeted cell death. Preclinical investigations demonstrated strong in vitro and in vivo anti-MM activity of BT062, providing the rationale for the conduct of clinical trials (Ikeda et al., 2009). Objectives: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetics (PK) and anti-MM activity of increasing doses of BT062 on a repeated single dose schedule once every three weeks in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Toxicities were assessed by CTCAE v3 and clinical response was assessed according to the international working group criteria. Methods: This is a prospective, open label, dose-escalation multicenter study. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM who have failed previous treatments including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor were eligible to participate. Patients with clinical response (or no evidence of progressive disease) and without unacceptable toxicities were eligible for further treatment cycles. Patients were enrolled in cohorts of 3 at each dose level, with DLT in the first cycle triggering cohort expansion. Results: A total of 32 patients have been treated with BT062, receiving one of 7 dose levels ranging from 10 mg/m2 to 200 mg/m2. Maximum administered dose has been defined at 200 mg/m2, with mucositis as the dose limiting toxicity (CTC grade III in 2 of the 3 patients in this cohort). Therefore, the MTD was defined at 160 mg/m2. Thirteen of 32 patients have been treated in an expanded MTD-cohort. No CTC grade 4 toxicity has been reported. The most frequently reported adverse events to date cover primarily events expected for the underlying disease and patient group. Most of the reported adverse events are CTC grade I to II. Nevertheless, a few adverse events have also been observed involving skin and/or mucosa (tissues of epithelial origin with CD138 expressing cells), as well as the eye. Severe events involving skin and/or mucosa (e.g. mucositis, hand/foot syndrome) have only been observed at the dose levels 160 mg/m2 or higher. Adverse events involving the eye (e.g. blurred vision, dry eye) have been reported in only 3 patients overall at the dose levels 160 mg/m2 or higher, all CTC grade I to II. At dose levels up to 120 mg/m2, preliminary PK results indicate an unusual rapid clearance from plasma in the early elimination phase, followed by a generally normal terminal elimination phase. A more typical clearance profile was observed for all patients at the 160 mg/m2 and 200 mg/m2 dose. To date, one patient showed a decrease in urine M-Protein by >50% after 8 repeated low doses of 20 mg/m2 each. At a high dose level of 160 mg/m2, another patient showed a >50% decrease of serum FLC after two doses of BT062. In total, stabilization of disease was noted in 13 patients. Patients with stable disease received a median of 5 cycles of therapy (range of 3–10). Most patients came off study due to disease progression. Conclusion: Preliminary data from this phase I study demonstrate an acceptable toxicity profile of BT062. Even in this phase I patient population, evidence of clinical activity was observed. Based on the favourable safety profile, the pharmacokinetic data and early signs of clinical activity, a Phase I/II study in MM is initiated to further evaluate the safety and anti-MM efficacy of BT062 in a more frequent dosing regimen. Updated results on safety, PK and efficacy of BT062 will be presented. Disclosures: Jagannath: Celgene: Honoraria; Millenium/Takeda Pharma: Honoraria; J&J Family: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria. Heffner:Millennium: Research Funding. Avigan:Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Curetec: Research Funding. Lutz:ImmunoGen, Inc.: Employment. Uherek:Biotest AG: Employment. Osterroth:Biotest AG: Employment. Ruehle:Biotest AG: Employment. Haeder:Biotest AG: Employment. Niemann:Biotest AG: Employment. Wartenberg-Demand:Biotest AG: Employment. Munshi:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Anderson:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Acetylon: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract 1862 Poster Board I-887 Background: Biotest AG (Dreieich, Germany) is developing the immunoconjugate BT062, which comprises the anti-CD138 chimerized MAb (nBT062) and the cytotoxic agent maytansinoid (DM4). Once bound to CD138 on a target cell, the conjugate is internalized and releases DM4. At present, CD138 represents one of the most reliable target antigens for identification of multiple myeloma (MM) cells and has been reported to be a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic marker of MM. Preclinical investigations demonstrated significant in vitro and in vivo anti-MM activity of BT062, providing the rationale for the conduct of clinical trials (Ikeda et al., 2009). Objectives: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetics (PK) and anti-MM activity of increasing doses of BT062 on a repeated single dose schedule once every three weeks in relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM. Clinical response was assessed as per the international working group criteria (Durie et al., 2006). Methods: This is a prospective, open label, dose-escalation multicenter study. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM who have failed previous treatments including an immunomodulating agent and a proteasome inhibitor were eligible to participate. Patients with clinical response (or no evidence of progressive disease) and without unacceptable toxicities were eligible for further treatment cycles. Patients are enrolled in cohorts of 3 at each dose level, with DLT in the first cycle triggering cohort expansion. Results: To date 20 patients have been treated with BT062 at 7 dose levels ranging from 10 mg/m2 to 200 mg/m2. Maximum administered dose has not been defined to date with continued enrollment at 200 mg/m2 dose. None of the patients treated experienced serious hypersensitivity reactions or humoral responses (HAHA) against BT062. The most frequently reported adverse events to date cover primarily events expected for the underlying disease. Nevertheless, a few adverse events have also been observed involving skin and mucosa (tissues of epithelial origin with CD138 expressing cells). No grade 4 toxicity has been reported. Preliminary PK results indicate an unusual rapid clearance from plasma in the early elimination phase, followed by a generally normal terminal elimination phase at dose levels up to 120 mg/m2, whereas a more typical clearance profile was observed for all 3 patients at the 160 mg/m2 dose. Interestingly, even in phase I study decreased urine M-Protein or serum FLC levels have been observed in 2 patients. One of these patients showed a decrease in urine M-Protein by more than 50% after administration of 8 repeated low doses. At a high dose level another patient without detectable M-Protein levels, showed a decrease of serum FLC by more than 50% after having received the second dose of BT062. Furthermore, evidence of clinical benefit has been observed in at least 6 patients with early stabilization of M-protein levels (and light-chain burden) in serum and /or urine. Conclusion: Development of a monoclonal antibody in MM remains an important therapeutic option and BT062 is an exciting possibility. Preliminary data from this phase I study, demonstrate an acceptable toxicity profile of BT062 in the clinics. Even in phase I study, evidence of clinical activity is observed. These encouraging results and the unique PK observed support investigation of a more frequent dosing regimen for optimizing anti-MM responses. Updated data on safety, PK and efficacy of BT062 from this clinical trial will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Jagannath: Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Avigan:Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lutz:Immunogen, Inc.: Employment. Haeder:Biotest AG: Employment. Ruehle:Biotest AG: Employment. Uherek:Biotest AG: Employment. Wartenberg-Demand:Biotest AG: Employment. Munshi:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biotest AG: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Summary Introduction Severe community-acquired pneumonia is defined as community-acquired pneumonia that requires intensive medical care. Mortality in these patients is still high depending on time and admission. Since bad outcomes may occur despite antibiotic therapy to treat severe community-acquired pneumonia, the focus has shifted to targeting the host response. The CIGMA Study examines the safety and efficacy of the novel IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparation BT086 when added to standard of care treatment. Methods/design The aim of this multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, adaptive group-sequential phase II study is to determine the efficacy and safety of BT086, an IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparation, as an adjunctive treatment in mechanically-ventilated patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. The increase of ventilator-free days is the primary endpoint in this study. For this trial, ventilator-free days are defined as the number of days between successful extubation from endotracheal ventilation and day 28 after enrolment of the patient into the study. Two interim analyses were considered for this study. Discussion Several novel agents for treatment of sepsis have been evaluated in the last two decades; however, none has significantly reduced mortality rates. Failure was attributed to the heterogeneity of septic patients or sepsis. Severe community-acquired pneumonia was chosen as the indication for this study to increase homogeneity within this patient population. Trial registration EUDRACT 2010-022380-35.