To evaluate the impact of different plume rise schemes on aerosol dispersion and photochemistry modeling during the 2020 recording-breaking wildfire season, four CMAQ simulations were conducted. In the first run (B69), we used the CMAQ default plume rise scheme based on Briggs (1969). In the second run (F07), we implemented the Freitas et al. (2007) scheme into the CMAQ model and used it to calculate the plume injection height. In the third run (S12), we used the Sofiev et al. (2012) plume rise scheme as implemented in Li et al. (2021). In the fourth run (NoFire), we turned off all types of biomass burning emissions. Wildfire impact is represented by the difference between the simulation with fire and the NoFire run. All four experiments were conducted using the George Mason University (GMU) air quality modeling system. This system uses CMAQ Version 5.3.1 (U.S. EPA, 2020a) as the chemical transport model and the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF; Skamarock et al., 2019) model V4.2 output as the meteorology inputs for the CMAQ model. The model domain is configured with 12 km by 12 km horizontal resolution and 35 vertical layers (the same horizontal and vertical resolution as NOAA’s operational National Air Quality Forecasting Capability). The initial and boundary conditions for WRF are from the Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) 0.25-degree analysis and forecast. The main physics choices were the Grell-Freitas scheme (Grell & Freitas, 2014) for parameterized cumulus processes, the Mellor-Yamada-Janjic scheme (Janjic, 1994) for planetary boundary layer (PBL) processes, the two-moment Morrison microphysics (Morrison et al., 2009) for cloud physics processes, the RRTMG scheme (Iacono et al., 2008) for longwave and shortwave radiation, and the Noah scheme (Koren et al., 1999) for land surface processes. The biomass burning emissions product used in this study is the 0.1 degree daily blended Global Biomass Burning Emissions Product from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) (GBBEPx V3, Zhang, et al., 2012, 2019). The GBBEPx Fire radiative power (FRP) in the GBBEPx is averaged from observations from MODIS on Terra and Aqua MODIS and VIIRS M-band on Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (SNPP) and the Joint Polar Satellite System-1 (JPSS) VIIRS. A climatological diurnal cycle from the Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) work was applied to the daily GBBEPx emission to derive hourly model-ready emission input. Anthropogenic emissions were prepared with the 2016v1 Emissions Modelling Platform, using the baseline emissions taken from the National Emissions Inventory (NEI) 2016 Collaborative (Eyth et al., 2020). We then shifted the base year emission to the prediction year 2020 using representative days of each month (U.S. EPA, 2020b). The model-ready emission files are processed and generated by the Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions (SMOKE) model (Houyoux et al., 2000) V4.7. The CB6 gas-phase chemical mechanism (Luecken et al., 2019), AE07 aerosol scheme (Pye et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2018), and aqueous chemistry (Fahey et al., 2017) is used in the CMAQ system. Details about the system setup are shown in Li et al. (2021)., {"references":["Briggs, G. A.: Plume rise, Tech. Rep. Crit. Rev. Ser. 81pp., Natl. Tech. Inf. Serv., Springfield, VA, 1969.","Freitas, S. R., Longo, K. M., Chatfield, R., Latham, D., Silva Dias, M. A. F., Andreae, M. O., Prins, E., Santos, J. C., Gielow, R., & Carvalho, J. A. Jr.: Including the sub‐grid scale plume rise of vegetation fires in low resolution atmospheric transport models. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 7(13), 3385– 3398. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3385-2007, 2007.","Sofiev, M., Ermakova, T., & Vankevich, R.: Evaluation of the smoke-injection height from wild-land fires using remote-sensing data. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 12(4), 1995–2006. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1995-2012, 2012.","Li, Y., Tong, D., Ma, S., Zhang, X., Kondragunta, S., Li, F., & Saylor, R.: Dominance of wildfires impact on air quality exceedances during the 2020 record-breaking wildfire season in the United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2021GL094908. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094908, 2021.","United States Environmental Protection Agency: CMAQ (Version 5.3.2) [Software]. Available from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4081737, 2020a.","United States Environmental Protection Agency: Technical Support Document (TSD) Preparation of Emissions Inventories for 2016v1 North American Emissions Modeling Platform, section 3.3, p120-121. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-10/documents/2016v1_emismod_tsd_508.pdf, 2020b.","Skamarock, W. C., J. B. Klemp, J. Dudhia, D. O. Gill, Z. Liu, J. Berner, W. Wang, J. G. Powers, M. G. Duda, D. M. Barker, and X.-Y. Huang: A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 4. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-556+STR, 145 pp, doi:10.5065/1dfh-6p97, 2019.","Grell, G. A., & Freitas, S. R.: A scale and aerosol aware stochastic convective parameterization for weather and air quality modeling. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(10), 5233–5250. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5233-2014, 2014.","Janjić, Z. I.: The Step-Mountain Eta Coordinate Model: Further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes. Monthly Weather Review, 122(5), 927–945. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)1222.0.CO;2, 1994.","Morrison, H., Thompson, G., & Tatarskii, V.: Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing Stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: Comparison of one- and two-moment schemes. Monthly Weather Review, 137(3), 991–1007. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2556.1, 2009.","Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A., & Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, D13103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944, 2008.","Koren, V., Schaake, J., Mitchell, K., Duan, Q.-Y., Chen, F., & Baker, J. M.: A parameterization of snowpack and frozen ground intended for NCEP weather and climate models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104, 19,569–19,585. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900232, 1999.","Zhang, X., Kondragunta, S., Da Silva, A., Lu, S., Ding, H., Li, F., & Zhu, Y.: The blended global biomass burning emissions product from MODIS and VIIRS observations (GBBEPx) version 3.1, https://www.ospo.noaa.gov/Products/land/gbbepx/docs/GBBEPx_ATBD.pdf, 2019.","Zhang, X., Kondragunta, S., Ram, J., Schmidt, C., & Huang, H.-C.: Near-real-time global biomass burning emissions product from geostationary satellite constellation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 117(D14). https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017459, 2012.","Eyth, A., Vukovich, J., Farkas, C., & Strum, M.: Technical Support Document (TSD) Preparation of Emissions Inventories for 2016v1 North American Emissions Modeling Platform, 2020.","Houyoux, M., Vukovich, J., Brandmeyer, J. E., Seppanen, C., & Holland, A.: Sparse matrix operator kernel emissions modeling system-SMOKE User manual. Prepared by MCNC-North Carolina Supercomputing Center, Environmental Programs, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2000.","Luecken, D.J., Yarwood, G., & Hutzell, W.H.: Multipollutant of ozone, reactive nitrogen and HAPs across the continental US with CMAQ-CB6. Atmospheric Environment, 201, 62-72. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.11.060, 2019.","Pye, H.O.T., Luecken, D.J., Xu, L., Boyd, C.M, Ng, N.L., Baker, K.R., Ayres, B.R., Bash, J.O., Baumann, K., Carter, W. P.L., Edgerton, E., Fry, J.L., Hutzell, W.T., Schwede, D.B., Shepson, P.B.: Modeling the current and future roles of particulate organic nitrates in the southerneastern United States. Environ Sci Technol 2015, 49(24), 14195-14203. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03738, 2015.","Xu, L., Pye, H. O. T., He, J., Chen, Y. L., Murphy, B. N., Ng, N. L.: Experimental and model estimates of the contributions from biogenic monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes to secondary organic aerosol in the southeastern United States. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18: 12613-12637. doi: 10.5194/acp-18-12613-2018, 2018.","Fahey, K.M., Carlton, A.G., Pye, H.O.T., Baek, J., Hutzell, W.T., Stanier, C.O., Baker, K.R., Appel, K.W., Jaoui, M., & Offenberg, J.H.: A framework for expanding aqueous chemistry in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.1. Geoscientific Model Development, 10, 1587-1605. doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-1587-2017, 2017."]}