Pierre-Henry Gabrielle, Jay Chhablani, Dinah Zur, Patricio J. Rodríguez-Valdés, Ermete Giancipoli, Catharina Busch, Voraporn Chaikitmongkol, Matias Iglicki, Matus Rehak, Marco Lupidi, Zafer Cebeci, Ana Rita Santos, Małgorzata Ozimek, Paradee Kunavisarut, Inês Laíns, Mali Okada, Valentin Degenhardt, Adrian T. Fung, Samantha Fraser-Bell, Anna Sala-Puigdollers, Assaf Hilely, Anat Loewenstein, Department of Ophthalmology [Leipzig], University Hospital Leipzig, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Division of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center [Te Aviv], Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University [Tel Aviv], Discipline of Clinical Ophthalmology and Eye Health, The University of Sydney, Instituto de Oftalmología y Ciencias Visuales, Escuela de Medicina, Tecnológico de Monterrey (ITESM)-Tecnológico de Monterrey (ITESM), Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University -Istanbul University, Department of Biomedical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Ophthalmology, University of Perugia-University of Perugia, Westmead Hospital [Sydney], Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University Hospital, Partenaires INRAE-Partenaires INRAE, Ophthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon - Hôpital François Mitterrand (CHU Dijon), Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation [Dijon] (CSGA), Université de Bourgogne (UB)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Department of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Sassari-University of Sassari-Eye Clinic, University of Sassari-University of Sassari, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Retina Division, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University (CMU)-Chiang Mai University (CMU)-Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University (CMU)-Chiang Mai University (CMU), University of Coimbra [Portugal] (UC), Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image (AIBILI), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School [Boston] (HMS), Department of Orthoptics, Superior School of Health, Polytechnic Institute of Porto-Polytechnic Institute of Porto, Institut Clínic d'Oftalmologia (ICOF), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, UPMC Eye Center, University of Pittsburgh (PITT), Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE)-Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE), L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Partenaires INRAE, Department of General Ophthalmology and Pediatric Ophthalmology Service, Medical University of Lublin, Heidelberg University Hospital [Heidelberg], Incumbent, Sydney A. Fox chair in Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv University [Tel Aviv]-Tel Aviv University [Tel Aviv], Private Retina Service, University of Buenos Aires [Argentina], and Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do Porto
International audience; Purpose: To investigate clinical baseline characteristics and optical coherence tomography biomarkers predicting visual loss during observation in eyes with diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and good baseline visual acuity (VA). Methods: A sub-analysis of a 12-month, retrospective study, including patients with baseline VA ≤0.1 logMAR (≥20/25 Snellen) and centre-involving DMO. The primary outcome measure was the correlation between baseline characteristics and VA loss ≥10 letters during follow-up. Results: A total of 249 eyes were included in the initial study, of which 147 eyes were observed and 80 eyes received anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment at baseline. Visual acuity (VA) loss ≥10 letters occurred in 21.8% (observed cohort) and in 24.3% (treated cohort), respectively. Within observed eyes, presence of hyperreflective foci [HRF; odds ratio (OR): 3.18, p = 0.046], and disorganization of inner retina layers (DRIL; OR: 2.71, p = 0.026) were associated with a higher risk of VA loss ≥10 letters. In observed eyes with a combined presence of HRF, DRIL and ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption, the risk of VA loss was further increased (OR: 3.86, p = 0.034). In eyes with combined presence of DRIL, HRF and EZ disruption, risk of VA loss was 46.7% (7/15 eyes) in the observed cohort, and 26.3% (5/19 eyes) in the treated cohort (p = 0.26). Conclusion: Patients with DMO and good baseline VA, managed by observation, are of increased risk for VA loss if DRIL, HRF and EZ disruption are present at baseline. Earlier treatment with anti-VEGF in these patients may potentially decrease the risk of VA loss at 12 months.