1. Should we individualize training based on force-velocity profiling to improve physical performance in athletes?
- Author
-
Gøran Abusdal, Olivier R. Seynnes, Paul Andre Solberg, Ole Sveen, Tommy Larsen, Martin Thorsen Frank, Bent R. Rønnestad, Sveinung Berntsen, Gøran Paulsen, Kolbjørn Lindberg, and Thomas Bjørnsen
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Team sport ,Strength training ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Squat ,jumping ,Athletic Performance ,medicine.disease_cause ,Running ,Young Adult ,Jumping ,medicine ,strength training ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Muscle Strength ,Mathematics ,Leg ,biology ,Athletes ,biology.organism_classification ,VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Idrettsmedisinske fag: 850 ,Sprint ,sprinting ,Physical performance ,Physical therapy ,Exercise Test ,human activities ,Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Samfunnsvitenskapelige idrettsfag: 330 [VDP] ,Force velocity ,performance ,Physical Conditioning, Human - Abstract
The present study aimed to examine the effectiveness of an individualized training program based on force-velocity (FV) profiling on jumping, sprinting, strength, and power in athletes. Forty national level team sport athletes (20 ± 4years, 83 ± 13 kg) from ice-hockey, handball, and soccer completed a 10-week training intervention. A theoretical optimal squat jump (SJ)-FV-profile was calculated from SJ with five different loads (0, 20, 40, 60, and 80 kg). Based on their initial FV-profile, athletes were randomized to train toward, away, or irrespective (balanced training) of their initial theoretical optimal FV-profile. The training content was matched between groups in terms of set x repetitions but varied in relative loading to target the different aspects of the FV-profile. The athletes performed 10 and 30 m sprints, SJ and countermovement jump (CMJ), 1 repetition maximum (1RM) squat, and a leg-press power test before and after the intervention. There were no significant group differences for any of the performance measures. Trivial to small changes in 1RM squat (2.9%, 4.6%, and 6.5%), 10 m sprint time (1.0%, −0.9%, and −1.7%), 30 m sprint time (0.9%, −0.6%, and −0.4%), CMJ height (4.3%, 3.1%, and 5.7%), SJ height (4.8%, 3.7%, and 5.7%), and leg-press power (6.7%, 4.2%, and 2.9%) were observed in the groups training toward, away, or irrespective of their initial theoretical optimal FV-profile, respectively. Changes toward the optimal SJ-FV-profile were negatively correlated with changes in SJ height (r = −0.49, p < 0.001). Changes in SJ-power were positively related to changes in SJ-height (r = 0.88, p < 0.001) and CMJ-height (r = 0.32, p = 0.044), but unrelated to changes in 10 m (r = −0.02, p = 0.921) and 30 m sprint time (r = −0.01, p = 0.974). The results from this study do not support the efficacy of individualized training based on SJ-FV profiling.
- Published
- 2021