Although a useful method for monitoring changes in species composition, frequency sampling does not provide herbage production or cover data needed to use existing range condition guides. Responding to this need, frequency sampling procedures were investigated for determining range condition. Eighteen mountain meadow sites were sampled with 100 nested frequency quadrats. These quadrats had 5 plot sizes contained (nested) within 1 frame: 5X5 cm, 1OX10 cm, 25X25 cm, 25X50 cm, and 50X50 cm. Rooted frequency of occurrence within each plot size was recorded by species. Discriminant analysis related a site's frequency data to its known range condition class, resulting in 2 range condition guides for mountain meadows based on frequency data. One guide was formulated with data from the 1OX10-cm quadrat size, and a second guide was based on summed data from the 4 largest plot sizes. Both guides had equal resolution, correctly classifying 15 of 18, or 83%, of sites examined. Our procedures should prove valuable in developing condition guides based on frequency data in other areas and in other vegetation types. Among the first to recognize that plants could be used as indicators of successional stages were Sampson (1919) and Jardine and Anderson (1919). Dyksterhuis (1948, 1949) refined the idea of plants as successional indicators and developed range condition classes based on a site's existing vegetation in relation to the site's potential climax. Continuing the work of Weaver and Hansen (1941), Dyksterhuis used the terms decreasers, increasers, and invaders to describe a species' ecological response to grazing presAuthors are research assistant, Range and Wildlife Management Department, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409; associate professor and professor of range resources, University of Idaho, Moscow 83843. At the time of the research, the senior author was research assistant, Range Resources Department, University of Idaho, Moscow 83843. Research was funded in part by USDA Science and Education Administration Grant No. 59-2161-1-2-082-0 and Forest, Wildlife and Range Exp. Sta., University of Idaho Contribution No. 278. The authors gratefully acknowledge personnel of the Boise, Payette, and Sawtooth National Forests for their assistance with this study. Manuscript accepted 17 February 1986. sure. Decreasers and increasers are species of undisturbed climax communities, whereas invaders are nonclimax species. Greater relative proportions of decreasers and increasers to invaders indicate higher successional stages. Current U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) range analysis procedures use the decreaser, increaser, and invader concepts (USDA 1976). In contrast to Dyksterhuis' purely ecological approach, Parker (Parker, K.W. 1951. A method for measuring trend in range condition on national forest range. USDA, Forest Service Mimeo.) introduced a condition classification concept that included livestock production and soil stability as additional criteria for evaluating plant species. Similar to the decreasers, increasers, and invaders presented by Dyksterhuis, Parker developed categories of desirables, intermediates, and least desirables. But Parker, instead of relying solely on a species' ecological role, included forage quality, palatability, and rooting characteristics as criteria for classifying species into his desirability groups. Most U.S. Forest Service (USFS) regions use Parker's desirable, intermediate, and least desirable categories in their range analysis procedures. Because different criteria are employed to judge plant species, the USFS and SCS methods may differ dramatically in their condition ratings of the same plant community. Whichever species classes are used in evaluating a site's range condition, those of Dyksterhuis or those of Parker, an investigator must first record the plant community's species composition. Species composition is the relative abundance of the species present in a plant community and is usually determined by measuring yield, cover, density, or frequency. It is important to realize that composition estimates will differ depending upon which measure is used. Since species composition is a relative comparison, it describes a community only in relation to the parameter upon which the composition estimates are based. Estimates of composition based on different parameters are not equivalent. For sampling ease and repeatability, a stable, objective measure is preferred for estimating JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT 39(6), November 1986 561 This content downloaded from 157.55.39.147 on Sun, 07 Aug 2016 06:05:33 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms species composition. Estimates based on yield or cover, however, fluctuate with seasonal and yearly climatic changes (Craddock and Forsling 1938, Odum 1960). And density, although a stable vegetation parameter, is often difficult and time consuming to measure, especially when plants reproduce vegetatively (Strickler and Stearns 1963). In contrast to these other parameters, perennial plant frequencies are simple to obtain, objective, and relatively stable from season to season and year to year (Hyder et al. 1966, MuellerDombois and Ellenburg 1974). Frequency is based on presence or absence of a species in a given number of repeatedly placed small quadrats. A species' frequency is the percentage of quadrats in which it occurs, varying from 0 to 100%. Because frequency is simple to obtain, objective, and relatively stable from season to season and year to year, frequency sampling is advantageous for monitoring changes in species composition. But as mentioned above, species composition based on frequency is not equivalent to composition by yield or cover-the inputs needed to use many current range condition guides. Frequency sampling can be used to monitor changes of individual species, but there is presently no way to describe these changes in terms of range condition classes. Development of condition guides based on frequency data would preclude the need to use 2 different sampling methods, 1 for monitoring changes of particular species and an additional method for classifying a site's range condition.