3 results on '"Stansbury, J."'
Search Results
2. Academy of Dental Materials guidance—Resin composites: Part I—Mechanical properties
- Author
-
Siegward D. Heintze, David C. Watts, Nicoleta Ilie, Jack L. Ferracane, Jeffrey W. Stansbury, Milena Cadenaro, Thomas J. Hilton, Nikolaos Silikas, Reinhard Hickel, Ilie, N., Hilton, T. J., Heintze, S. D., Hickel, R., Watts, D. C., Silikas, N., Stansbury, J. W., Cadenaro, M., and Ferracane, J. L.
- Subjects
Toughne ,Wear resistance ,Toughness ,Materials science ,Surface Properties ,Surface Propertie ,02 engineering and technology ,Hardne ,Composite Resins ,Indentation hardness ,Dental Material ,Dental Materials ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Fracture toughness ,stomatognathic system ,Hardness ,Elastic Modulus ,Materials Testing ,Humans ,General Materials Science ,Composite material ,General Dentistry ,Elastic modulus ,Elastic Modulu ,030206 dentistry ,Test method ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,Composite Resin ,Strength of materials ,Deformation ,Fracture ,Mechanics of Materials ,Dentistry (all) ,Fracture (geology) ,Strength ,Materials Science (all) ,Deformation (engineering) ,0210 nano-technology ,Human - Abstract
Objective The objective of this project, which was initiated from the Academy of Dental Materials, was to review and critically appraise methods to determine fracture, deformation and wear resistance of dental resin composites, in an attempt to provide guidance for investigators endeavoring to study these properties for these materials. Methods Test methods have been ranked in the priority of the specific property being tested, as well as of the specific test methods for evaluating that property. Focus was placed on the tests that are considered to be of the highest priority in terms of being the most useful, applicable, supported by the literature, and which show a correlation with clinical findings. Others are mentioned briefly for the purpose of being inclusive. When a standard test method exists, including those used in other fields, these have been identified in the beginning of each section. Also, some examples from the resin composite literature are included for each test method. Results The properties for evaluating resin composites were ranked in the priority of measurement as following: (1) Strength, Elastic Modulus, Fracture toughness, Fatigue, Indentation Hardness, Wear—abrasion (third body) and Wear—attrition (contact/two body), (2) Toughness, Edge strength (chipping) and (3) Wear determined by toothbrush. Significance The following guidance is meant to aid the researcher in choosing the proper method to assess key properties of dental resin composites with regard to their fracture, deformation and wear resistance.
- Published
- 2017
3. Academy of Dental Materials guidance-Resin composites: Part II-Technique sensitivity (handling, polymerization, dimensional changes)
- Author
-
Jack L. Ferracane, Nicoleta Ilie, Thomas J. Hilton, David C. Watts, Siegward D. Heintze, Nikolaos Silikas, Reinhard Hickel, Jeffrey W. Stansbury, Milena Cadenaro, Ferracane, J. L., Hilton, T. J., Stansbury, J. W., Watts, D. C., Silikas, N., Ilie, N., Heintze, S., Cadenaro, M., and Hickel, R.
- Subjects
Dental composite ,Materials science ,Surface Properties ,Resin composite ,Polyurethanes ,Acrylic Resins ,Density ,Handling ,Polymerization ,Shrinkage ,Shrinkage stress ,Technique sensitivity ,Materials Science (all) ,Dentistry (all) ,Mechanics of Materials ,02 engineering and technology ,Shrinkage stre ,Composite Resins ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Hardness ,Elastic Modulus ,Materials Testing ,General Materials Science ,Sensitivity (control systems) ,Composite material ,Process engineering ,Dental Composite ,Technique Sensitivity ,Shrinkage Stress ,General Dentistry ,business.industry ,ResearchInstitutes_Networks_Beacons/03/02 ,030206 dentistry ,Test method ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,Strength of materials ,Slump ,0210 nano-technology ,business ,Advanced materials - Abstract
Objective The objective of this work, commissioned by the Academy of Dental Materials, was to review and critically appraise test methods to characterize properties related to critical issues for dental resin composites, including technique sensitivity and handling, polymerization, and dimensional stability, in order to provide specific guidance to investigators planning studies of these properties. Methods The properties that relate to each of the main clinical issues identified were ranked in terms of their priority for testing, and the specific test methods within each property were ranked. An attempt was made to focus on the tests and methods likely to be the most useful, applicable, and supported by the literature, and where possible, those showing a correlation with clinical outcomes. Certain methods are only briefly mentioned to be all-inclusive. When a standard test method exists, whether from dentistry or another field, this test has been identified. Specific examples from the literature are included for each test method. Results The properties for evaluating resin composites were ranked in the priority of measurement as follows: (1) porosity, radiopacity, sensitivity to ambient light, degree of conversion, polymerization kinetics, depth of cure, polymerization shrinkage and rate, polymerization stress, and hygroscopic expansion; (2) stickiness, slump resistance, and viscosity; and (3) thermal expansion. Significance The following guidance is meant to aid the researcher in choosing the most appropriate test methods when planning studies designed to assess certain key properties and characteristics of dental resin composites, specifically technique sensitivity and handling during placement, polymerization, and dimensional stability.
- Published
- 2017
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.