Deletion of eight chromatin regulators and one transcription factor increases the variability in gene expression between two closely related yeast species, suggesting that large-scale regulators often buffer variations in gene expression. Similar analysis of metabolic enzymes indicates that, unlike regulators, these enzymes do not buffer gene expression variations., Biological systems are often robust to mutations—their outputs, (for example, gene expression profiles) remain stable in the face of mutations. This ensures that most individuals maintain the ‘correct' behavior, which has been shaped by million of years of evolution, despite a constant flux of mutations. How is robustness maintained, and in particular, which genes are required for it? Such questions have been studied for decades, yet there are no simple answers. Previous studies suggested that particular proteins, termed genetic capacitors, buffer the effects of mutations, thereby promoting robustness. The classical example of such a protein is Hsp90, whose activity as a chaperone has been proposed to aid the correct folding of mutant proteins and thus buffer the structural effects of mutations. The hallmark of a genetic capacitor is that its deletion reveals phenotypic differences between individuals or species, which are hidden (that is, buffered) in its presence. The example of Hsp90 may suggest that buffering is a property of only few proteins that carry particular catalytic functions such as chaperones. However, theoretical studies have instead suggested that many proteins serve as genetic capacitors and that buffering is not necessarily a consequence of their direct activity but rather emerges naturally during evolution of complex biological systems. Here, we show that eight chromatin regulators and one transcription factor buffer interspecies variations in gene expression. We deleted each of these nine regulators in two closely related yeast species and compared the extent of interspecies expression difference before and after each deletion. The results clearly show that deletion of these regulators tends to increase the extent of expression differences, indicating that they are normally buffering variations in gene expression, thus serving as genetic capacitors. Similar analysis of 11 metabolic enzymes showed that, unlike the regulators, deletion of these enzymes does not increase expression divergence. Thus, buffering may be a characteristic feature of large-scale regulators. Further analysis of the buffered variations suggested that these are often caused by mutations that affect regulatory proteins, presumably those involved in sensing the environment, and that buffered variations are found primarily in genes with distinctive promoter features that are associated with highly dynamic and responsive regulation. We believe, as others have previously proposed, that buffering emerged naturally during evolution of a complex system. More specifically, we propose that organisms accumulate many mutations that have no functional consequences through random drift, but that some of these mutations would in fact be functional if a certain regulatory protein is inactive. These mutations are often conditionally neutral because of their epistatic interactions with mutations in regulatory proteins. Such epistatic interactions may not reflect direct buffering activity (as proposed for Hsp90) but rather an inevitable consequence of the connectivity and complexity of biological systems. Note that the opposite case—mutations that are normally functional but become neutral when the regulatory protein is inactive—are also frequent, but these are presumed to be efficiently purged by natural selection. As a result, deletion of such regulatory proteins unleashes the effects of many ‘hidden' mutations and increases variations among individuals or species., Gene expression varies widely between closely related species and strains, yet the genetic basis of most differences is still unknown. Several studies suggested that chromatin regulators have a key role in generating expression diversity, predicting a reduction in the interspecies differences on deletion of genes that influence chromatin structure or modifications. To examine this, we compared the genome-wide expression profiles of two closely related yeast species following the individual deletions of eight chromatin regulators and one transcription factor. In all cases, regulator deletions increased, rather than decreased, the expression differences between the species, revealing hidden genetic variability that was masked in the wild-type backgrounds. This effect was not observed for individual deletions of 11 enzymes involved in central metabolic pathways. The buffered variations were associated with trans differences, as revealed by allele-specific profiling of the interspecific hybrids. Our results support the idea that regulatory proteins serve as capacitors that buffer gene expression against hidden genetic variability.