1. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes for Patients Treated With Gradually Reducing Radius Versus Single-Radius Total Knee Arthroplasty Systems
- Author
-
Hyuk-Soo, Han, Sang Jun, Song, Chong Bum, Chang, Cheol Hee, Park, Sungho, Won, and Myung Chul, Lee
- Subjects
Radius ,Treatment Outcome ,Contracture ,Postoperative Complications ,Knee Joint ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Surgery ,Range of Motion, Articular ,Osteoarthritis, Knee ,Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ,Knee Prosthesis ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
The choice of implant used for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may have an impact on clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes after TKA with gradually reducing radius implants (group G) vs single-radius implants (group S) were evaluated among Asian patients. This study included 541 patients (754 knees) in group G and 187 patients (275 knees) in group S. Range of motion (ROM), flexion contracture, American Knee Society Knee and American Knee Society Function scores (KSKS and KSFS, respectively), and mechanical and anatomic tibiofemoral angles (MTFA and ATFA, respectively) were evaluated with electronic medical records. In univariate analysis, improvements in ROM, KSKS, and KSFS were significantly better in group G compared with group S at 1-year follow-up. Multivariable analyses showed greater ROM (4.52°, P =.002), decreased flexion contracture (−2.80°, P =.011), and improved KSKS (15.57, P Orthopedics . 2022;45(6):367–372.]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF