Search

Several materials for 3D printing of fixed dental prostheses (FDP) have been recently introduced. This study aims to evaluate the initial biocompatibility of novel printable resins for manufacturing temporary and permanent FDP.Specimens of five printable resins (VarseoSmile Crown plus, NextDent CB MFH, VarseoSmile Temp, Temp PRINT, P Pro CrownBridge), two types of resins for subtractive manufacturing (Tetric CAD, Telio CAD) and two types of resins with conventional curing processes (Tetric EvoCeram, Protemp 4) were produced and finished. Post-processing was strictly performed according to the manufacturer's protocol. Biocompatibility was evaluated by eluting specimens with cell culture medium and treating human gingival fibroblast cells with the eluates. A 72-hour continuous read cell viability assay measuring the reducing potential of the cells was performed. The cellular inflammatory response in terms of IL-6 and PGETetric CAD and Telio CAD were slightly toxic. All other resins were moderately to severely cytotoxic. VarseoSmile Crown plus and P Pro CrownBridge significantly enhanced PGEFurther post-processing steps such as additional curing and washing may improve the biocompatibility of printable materials.

Objectives To investigate the initial bacterial adhesion on 3D-printed splint materials in relation to their surface properties. Materials and methods Specimens of five printable splint resins (SHERAprint-ortho plus UV, NextDent Ortho Rigid, LuxaPrint Ortho Plus, V-Print Splint, KeySplint Soft), one polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) block for subtractive manufacturing (Astron CLEARsplint Disc), two conventional powder/liquid PMMA materials (FuturaGen, Astron CLEARsplint), and one polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) thermoplastic sheet for vacuum forming (Erkodur Thermoforming Foil) were produced and finished. Surface roughness Ra was determined via contact profilometry. Surface morphology was examined under a scanning electron microscope. Multi-species bacterial biofilms were grown on entire splints. Total biofilm mass and viable bacterial counts (CFU/ml) within the biofilms were determined. Statistical analyses were performed with a one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test, and Pearson’s test (p Results Astron CLEARsplint and KeySplint Soft specimens showed the highest surface roughness. The mean total biofilm mass on KeySplint Soft splints was higher compared to all other materials (p Ra, biofilm mass, and CFU/ml. A positive correlation was found between Ra and CFU/ml (r = 0.69, p = 0.04). Conclusions The 3D-printed splints showed overall favorable results regarding surface roughness and bacterial adhesion. Thermoplastic materials seem to display a higher surface roughness, making them more susceptible to microbial adhesion. Clinical relevance The development of caries and gingivitis in patients with oral appliances may be affected by the type of material.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the anti-biofilm effect of polyhexanide mouth rinses against oral pathogens in vitro.Biofilms of Candida albicans, Streptococcus mutans, Actinomyces naeslundii...

Objectives To evaluate the biological and physicochemical features of bioactive root canal sealers. Materials and methods Human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (hPDLF) and human osteoblasts (hOB) were exposed to eluates of three bioactive root canal sealers, GuttaFlow® bioseal (GF), BioRoot™ RCS (BR), and TotalFill® BC Sealer (TF), and the epoxy resin–based sealer AH plus® (AH). Cytotoxicity and cellular inflammatory response were evaluated. The osteogenic potential was examined using human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC). Film thickness, flowability, and pH were assessed. Root canal treatment was performed on human extracted teeth to evaluate the sealers’ tightness towards bacterial penetration. The antibacterial activity against common pathogens in primary root canal infections was tested. Results AH was severely cytotoxic to hPDLF and hOB (p p p 2 production in hPDLF and hOB (p p p Conclusions This study revealed favorable in vitro results regarding the biocompatibility of the bioactive root canal sealers. Clinical relevance Bioactive root canal sealers may be a useful alternative to epoxy resin–based sealers.

Antimicrobial peptides are receiving increasing attention as potential therapeutic agents for treating biofilm-related infections of the oral cavity. Many bacteria residing in biofilms exhibit an enhanced antibiotic tolerance, which grants intrinsically susceptible microorganisms to survive lethal concentrations of antibiotics. In this study, we examined the effects of two endogenous human antimicrobial peptides, LL-37 and human Lactoferricin, on the antibiotic drug efficacy of amoxicillin, clindamycin and metronidazole in two types of polymicrobial biofilms, which aimed to represent frequent oral diseases: (1) facultative anaerobic (Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, Actinomyces naeslundii) and (2) obligate anaerobic biofilms (Veillonella parvula, Parvimonas micra, Fusobacterium nucleatum). LL-37 and Lactoferricin enhanced the anti-biofilm effect of amoxicillin and clindamycin in facultative anaerobic biofilms. Metronidazole alone was ineffective against facultative anaerobic biofilms, but the presence of LL-37 and Lactoferricin led to a greater biofilm reduction. Obligate anaerobic biofilms showed an increased drug tolerance to amoxicillin and clindamycin, presumably due to metabolic downshifts of the bacteria residing within the biofilm. However, when combined with LL-37 or Lactoferricin, the reduction of obligate anaerobic biofilms was markedly enhanced for all antibiotics, even for amoxicillin and clindamycin. Furthermore, our results suggest that antimicrobial peptides enhance the dispersion of matured biofilms, which may be one of their mechanisms for targeting biofilms. In summary, our study proves that antimicrobial peptides can serve as an auxiliary treatment strategy for combatting enhanced antibiotic tolerance in bacterial biofilms.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the anti-biofilm effect of polyhexanide mouth rinses against oral pathogensBiofilms ofRegardless of blood contamination ProntOral led to a significant reduction of biofilm mass in all strains. Chlorhexidine and polyhexanide reduced biofilm mass in five out of six strains and in only four strains after blood contamination. All agents significantly reduced CFU/ml fromPolyhexanide mouth rinses seem to be suitable disinfectants against oral pathogens without their anti-biofilm potential being impaired by blood.