Ana Montoya, Clara Calvert, Doris Chou, Susannah Woodd, Oona M. R. Campbell, Li Pi, Maria Barreix, Andrea M. Rehman, Woodd, Susannah L [0000-0001-7389-2351], Barreix, Maria [0000-0003-3613-9672], Pi, Li [0000-0001-7818-408X], Calvert, Clara [0000-0003-3272-1040], Rehman, Andrea M [0000-0001-9967-5822], Chou, Doris [0000-0003-0250-4010], Campbell, Oona MR [0000-0002-9311-0115], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Background Infection is an important, preventable cause of maternal morbidity, and pregnancy-related sepsis accounts for 11% of maternal deaths. However, frequency of maternal infection is poorly described, and, to our knowledge, it remains the one major cause of maternal mortality without a systematic review of incidence. Our objective was to estimate the average global incidence of maternal peripartum infection. Methods and findings We searched Medline, EMBASE, Global Health, and five other databases from January 2005 to June 2016 (PROSPERO: CRD42017074591). Specific outcomes comprised chorioamnionitis in labour, puerperal endometritis, wound infection following cesarean section or perineal trauma, and sepsis occurring from onset of labour until 42 days postpartum. We assessed studies irrespective of language or study design. We excluded conference abstracts, studies of high-risk women, and data collected before 1990. Three reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and appraised quality. Quality criteria for incidence/prevalence studies were adapted from the Joanna Briggs Institute. We used random-effects models to obtain weighted pooled estimates of incidence risk for each outcome and metaregression to identify study-level characteristics affecting incidence. From 31,528 potentially relevant articles, we included 111 studies of infection in women in labour or postpartum from 46 countries. Four studies were randomised controlled trials, two were before–after intervention studies, and the remainder were observational cohort or cross-sectional studies. The pooled incidence in high-quality studies was 3.9% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.8%–6.8%) for chorioamnionitis, 1.6% (95% CI 0.9%–2.5%) for endometritis, 1.2% (95% CI 1.0%–1.5%) for wound infection, 0.05% (95% CI 0.03%–0.07%) for sepsis, and 1.1% (95% CI 0.3%–2.4%) for maternal peripartum infection. 19% of studies met all quality criteria. There were few data from developing countries and marked heterogeneity in study designs and infection definitions, limiting the interpretation of these estimates as measures of global infection incidence. A limitation of this review is the inclusion of studies that were facility-based or restricted to low-risk groups of women. Conclusions In this study, we observed pooled infection estimates of almost 4% in labour and between 1%–2% of each infection outcome postpartum. This indicates maternal peripartum infection is an important complication of childbirth and that preventive efforts should be increased in light of antimicrobial resistance. Incidence risk appears lower than modelled global estimates, although differences in definitions limit comparability. Better-quality research, using standard definitions, is required to improve comparability between study settings and to demonstrate the influence of risk factors and protective interventions., Susannah Woodd and co-workers report a meta-analysis on the incidence and distribution of maternal peripartum infection., Author summary Why was this study done? Maternal infections during pregnancy and childbirth are a leading cause of preventable death in both the mother and child. It is unknown how frequently maternal infections occur because existing studies have not been summarised previously, to our knowledge. It is important for decision makers and clinical staff to know how common these infections are so that efforts are made to prevent them. One key reason it is difficult to summarise data on maternal infections is that the research community has used a wide variety of differing criteria to classify women as having an infection. What did the researchers do and find? We screened 31,528 research articles and included 111 in a systematic review of maternal peripartum infection, defined by the World Health Organization as infection of the genital tract and surrounding tissues during labour and up to 42 days after birth. We included articles published in all languages that would provide an estimate of the frequency of infection and found data from 46 countries. Using meta-analysis to combine the estimates of infection and account for variability between studies, we found that for 1,000 women giving birth, we estimated averages of 39 women with chorioamnionitis, 16 women with endometritis, 12 women with wound infection, and 0.5 women with sepsis. Estimates of infection varied considerably between different studies, partly explained by world region, the study design, and the criteria used to determine infection. What do these findings mean? Infection is an important complication for many women at and after giving birth, and infection prevention should be a priority for clinicians and policymakers. However, our study found less infection than has been previously estimated. Representative data from all world regions were not available, highlighting knowledge gaps. Future research will benefit from the use of standardised infection definitions and good-quality study methods.