Search

Purpose of the study To evaluate the outcomes and complications using cemented megaprosthesis in elderly patients with distal femur nonunions (DFN). Materials and methods Between 2012 and 2016, 24 patients of DFN with an average age of 71.8 years (66–83) and an average 1.9(1–3) prior surgery was managed with distal femur replacement using cemented modular endoprosthesis. Outcomes were analysed on the following criteria: implant status, complications, knee range of motion, Knee Society Score (KSS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score. Results All patients were extremely satisfied with their outcomes. At an average 22.1 months (10–43) follow-up, patients had an average 69.5° (40°-110°) knee flexion, an average KSS of 75.7 (63–88) and an average MSTS score of 19.3 (17–25). Four patients died at an average 21.3 months after surgery due to causes unrelated to the fracture. One patient (4.1%) had implant-related complication; deep infection which required debridement and intravenous antibiotics. There were no late amputations or peri-operative deaths and no patient had aseptic loosening of components. Conclusion By permitting immediate full weight-bearing ambulation and with most patients returning to an acceptable functional status, cemented megaprosthesis is a viable and useful single-stage management option in elderly patients with DFN.

Purpose Osteoarthritis of knees with varus deformity is associated with a compensatory valgus deformity of the hindfoot and a lateral loading foot pressure pattern. However, whether this abnormal loading pattern is corrected in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is unclear. Methods The alignment and loading pattern of 91 consecutive patients (121 knees) undergoing TKA with pre-operative varus more than 10° were evaluated prospectively with functional outcome scores, static conventional radiography and dynamic pedobarogaphy pre-operatively and 1-year post-operatively. Outcomes assessed were Oxford Knee Scores, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Scores, femorotibial mechanical angle, tibia–hindfoot angle, hindfoot valgus/varus index (VVI), foot line of pressure (LOP) laterality and peak pressure (PP) at both time points. Results Of 121 knees, 98 (81%) regained normal alignment of the knee and 114 (92%) of the hindfoot. Similarly, PP (p Conclusion The present study shows, following the correction of knee varus with TKA, hindfoot alignment and foot loading pattern are both restored in the majority of patients. TKA offers both static and dynamic correction as seen in the hindfoot and loading pattern, respectively. Level of evidence Level III: prospective case–control study.

Purpose of the study To document and compare the functional outcome of neutral alignment and under-correction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in severe varus knees of more than 15° at three and 12 months post-surgery. Materials and methods One hundred twenty-four consecutive patients (163 TKAs) of an average age of 61.9 years (52–79) with a pre-operative varus more than 15° were managed with jig-based TKA. Based on the post-operative mechanical femorotibial alignment (FTMA), they were categorised into three groups, namely neutral (180 + 3°), mild varus (173° to 176°) and severe varus (172° and below). The outcomes of these three groups were assessed at three and 12 months by the Oxford knee score and the WOMAC score were calculated and co-related to the extent of correction. Results At three months, knees in the mild varus group (n = 88) had the best results with an Oxford knee score of 41.76 + 1.44 and a WOMAC score of 19.29 + 2.93 compared to the severe varus group and the neutral alignment group which had Oxford knee scores (OKS) of 37.43 + 2.51 and 31.91 + 3.51 and WOMAC scores of 22.57 + 1.51 and 24.46 + 4.15 respectively. However at 12 months, knees in all the groups (neutral, mild varus, severe varus) had similar good functional outcomes with OKS of 39.08 + 1.68, 39.24 + 1.88, 39.29 + 1.11 and WOMAC scores of 17.42 + 2.15, 16.48 + 2.11, 16.14 + 1.21 respectively. A scatter plot done for post-operative FTMA and the functional outcome score for both scores showed a bell curve with the best outcome corresponding to a FTMA of 175° at 3 months and equal distribution for both scores at 12 months. Conclusion The results of our study showed that minimal under-correction gave superior functional outcomes at three months. But this advantage was temporary and both, under-correction and neutral alignment achieved equally good outcomes at one year. Considering the increased prosthesis longevity associated with neutral alignment, we propose that neutral alignment must be aimed for during TKA for knees with severe varus. Study Design Prospective study

Background The aim of this article is to study the correlation between preoperative pain sensitivity and postoperative pain and analgesic requirements for patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. Methods Between December 2018 and April 2019, the pain sensitivity of 178 consecutive patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty was assessed preoperatively with a digital algometer. The patients reported the VAS (visual analog scale) score at 3 instances of needle prick (phlebotomy, glucometer blood sugar, intradermal antibiotic test dose), during the range of movements and completed the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale score. Postoperative VAS score, analgesic requirement, and physiotherapy milestones were recorded in all these patients on day 0 to day 4. Results The average age of the patients was 64.13 years and 69.1% were females. Females had lower mean algometry values (56.12 ± 12.77 [standard deviation]) compared to males (71.09 ± 18.78 [standard deviation]) (P < .001). Higher Depression Anxiety Stress Scale correlated with lower algometry values (P < .001). The postoperative VAS score was 2.54 ± 0.59 on the day of surgery which increased to 3.27 ± 0.69 on day 1 after mobilization (P < .001) and reduced to 1.67 ± 0.62 on day 4. Low algometer score correlated with higher postoperative VAS score (P < .05), increased analgesic requirement, and opioid utilization (P < .001), delay in achieving an optimum range of movements (P < .001) and independent ambulation (P < .001). Conclusion Preoperative assessment of pain sensitivity predicts postoperative analgesic requirements and recovery. Patients with a lower pain threshold should be counseled preoperatively and also receive a better titration of analgesics perioperatively and prolonged physiotherapy.

Introduction: Para-articular osteochondromas are rare osteocartilaginous tumors arising adjacent to the joint, more common around the knee. In contrast to osteochondroma, they occur in elderly patients. Case Report: We report a 60-year-old female with slow-growing, extraosseous soft tissue mass in the infrapatellar fat pad region with coexisting osteoarthritis. Total excision of the mass with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) done. The patient had excellent functional outcome with no recurrence at 2-year follow-up. Conclusion: The incidence of para-articular osteochondromas in elderly patients with coexisting osteoarthritis is very rare. Clinicoradiological features along with histopathology confirm its diagnosis. Total excision is the mainstay of treatment along with TKA if there is coexisting arthritis and its recurrence is very rare.

Purpose:Tibial bowing in valgus knees with arthritis can lead to component malplacement during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Incidence of valgus knees with medial tibial bowing, its effect on tibial component placement during primary TKA and methods to improve accuracy of the component placement were studied.Methods:Full-length weight-bearing alignment radiograph was taken in 117 patients (149 knees) with valgus deformity undergoing TKA. In these cases, the proximal tibial reference for extramedullary jig placement was planned preoperatively with reference to the tibial spines and classified as four zones.Results:The mean preoperative hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle was 192.9° (180.3–234.5°). Bowing >3° was considered significant ( p < 0.001) and at this level of bowing, the proximal tibial reference was shifted from centre to medial. Tibial bowing 3° as tibia valga. Tibia was bowed in 70 knees (46.97%). Severity of valgus deformity had strong positive correlation with the tibia valga ( p < 0.001). The post-operative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and HKA angle were 91.63° (87.9–95.7°) and 182.6° (178.1–189.7°), respectively. The mean MPTA and post-operative HKA angle in bowed and straight tibiae were 90.35° versus 89.78° ( p = 0.547) and 181.5° versus 180.7° ( p = 0.5716), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant.Conclusion:Medial tibial bowing is very common in valgus knees. Tibia valga has a strong positive correlation with the severity of valgus deformity. Accurate tibial component placement can be achieved with a medialized reference point for extramedullary tibial cutting jig in knees with significant tibia valga. The study has been registered in clinical trials registry – India (CTRI/2018/03/012283).

Our aim was to determine the variation in valgus correction angle and the influence of individualised distal femoral cut on femoral component placement and limb alignment during total knee replacement (TKR) in knees with varus deformity.The study was done prospectively in two stages. In the first stage, the valgus correction angle (VCA) was calculated in long-limb radiographs of 227 patients and correlated with pre-operative parameters of femoral bowing, neck-shaft angle and hip-knee-ankle angle. In the second part comprising of 240 knees with varus deformity, 140 (group 1) had the distal femoral cut individualised according to the calculated VCA, while the remaining 100 knees (group 1) were operated with a fixed distal femoral cut of 5°. The outcome of surgery was studied by grouping the knees as varus10°, 10-15° and15°.Of the 227 limbs analysed in stage I, 70 knees (31 %) had a VCA angle outside 5-7°. Coronal bowing (p 0.001), neck-shaft angle (p 0.001) and preoperative deformity (p 0.001) significantly influenced VCA. Results of the second phase of the study showed a significant improvement in both femoral component placement and postoperative alignment when VCA was individualised in the groups of knees with varus 10-15° (p 0.002) and varus15° (p 0.002).Valgus correction angle is highly variable and is influenced by femoral bowing, neck-shaft angle and pre-operative deformity. Individualisation of VCA is preferable in patients with moderate and severe varus deformity.Level 2.

Lateral tibial bowing leads to varus placement of the tibial component during total knee replacement in varus knees. Lateralised tibial jig placement can improve the accuracy of the tibial cut.A total of 227 patients (300 knees) undergoing total knee replacements were randomised into two groups. In the study group, the point of intersection of the distal tibial diaphyseal line at the tibial plateau drawn on long films was represented by zones. Knees with femoral bowing5° (28%) were excluded. Tibial jig placement on the proximal tibia was lateralised according to the zones. In the control group, the mid-point of the tibial plateau was taken as a reference. Femoral and tibial bowing, postoperative limb alignment and component placement were assessed.Of the 216 knees that were studied, 106 were in the study group and 110 in the control group. Bowing ≥3° had a significant positive correlation with lateralisation of the proximal tibial reference (p 0.001). The Incidence of tibial bowing ≥3° was 57.33%. The mean postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle was 178.31 ± 2.88° and 176.53 ± 2.88° (p 0.001), whereas the mean medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) was 89.91 ± 1.42° and 88.79 ± 1.72° (p 0.001) in the study and control groups, respectively. Considering bowed tibiae alone, HKA angle and MPTA in the study group were 178.08 ± 2.81° and 89.72 ± 1.39° compared with 175.88 ± 2.87° and 88.38 ± 1.38° in the control group (p 0.001).There is a high incidence of tibial bowing in varus knees. Lateralised tibial jig placement improved tibial component placement and postoperative limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty in varus knees with tibial bowing.