Search

Jacqueline Ann Nicholas,1 Aaron Lee Boster,1 Jaime Imitola,1,2 Colleen O’Connell,1 Michael Karl Racke1,21Department of Neurology and Multiple Sclerosis Center, 2Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USAAbstract: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is the most recent oral disease-modifying therapy approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and is indicated for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Prior to approval for use in MS, DMF and its active metabolite, monomethyl fumarate, had been used for decades as two of the fumaric acid esters in Fumaderm®, a medication used in Europe for the treatment of psoriasis. The unique mechanism of action of DMF remains under evaluation; however, it has been shown to act through multiple pathways leading to shifts away from the Th1 proinflammatory response to the less inflammatory Th2 response. Preliminary data suggest that DMF may induce neuroprotective effects in central nervous system white matter, although further studies are needed to demonstrate these effects on inflammatory demyelination. The DMF Phase III clinical trials demonstrated its efficacy with regard to a reduction in the annualized relapse rate and reductions in new or enlarging T2 lesions and numbers of gadolinium-enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. DMF has a well-defined safety profile, given the experience with its use in the treatment of psoriasis, and more recently from the DMF clinical trials program and post-marketing era for treatment of MS. The safety profile and oral mode of administration of DMF place it as an attractive first-line therapy option for the treatment of relapsing forms of MS. Long-term observational studies will be needed to determine the effects of DMF on progression of disability in MS.Keywords: multiple sclerosis, dimethyl fumarate, disease-modifying therapy, Nrf2 pathway, quality of life

On July 20-22nd 2006, the second International Rare Neuroimmunologic Disorders Symposium was held in Baltimore, Maryland. The purpose of this symposium was to bring together diverse groups interested in immune-mediated disorders of the nervous system. The symposium was not disease-specific but attempted to emphasize mechanisms shared by various diseases within the neuroimmunologic spectrum

Background: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an oral DNA base synthesis inhibitor with immunomodulatory effects on B cells, T cells, and macrophages. Objective: To conduct a safety and tolerability pilot study of interferon beta-1a (IFN-b1a) in combination with either placebo or oral MMF in multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: Twenty-four treatment-naïve R—RMS patients participated in a one-year prospective, placebo-controlled, blinded, safety pilot clinical trial. Every patient injected weekly intramuscular interferon beta-1a. The cohort was then randomized (1 : 1) to either active oral MMF or identical-appearing placebo tablets. Clinical evaluations were assessed every 3 months, along with brain MRI scans performed at baseline and repeated every 60 days for one year. Comprehensive laboratory assessments were monitored for safety, along with adverse events. Results: In this small pilot investigation, no differences were identified between the two treatment groups with respect to patient-reported adverse events, MRI metrics, or laboratory abnormalities. Notwithstanding these observations, and the limited number of patients treated, trends appeared to favor the combination therapy regimen. Conclusions: The combination treatment regimen of interferon beta-1a and MMF appeared to be well tolerated in this pilot study. Despite the small sample size, therapeutic trends were observed in favor of combination therapy. An adequately powered controlled trial of MMF in MS appears warranted.

Disease-modifying agents (DMAs), including interferon beta (IFNbeta) and glatiramer acetate (GA), are the mainstays of long-term treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). Other potent anti-inflammatory agents like natalizumab and different types of chemotherapeutics are increasingly being used for treatment of MS, particularly in patients with breakthrough disease activity. Brain volume (BV) loss occurs early in the disease process, accelerates over time, and may be only partially affected by DMA therapy. Low-dose, low frequency IFNbeta administered once weekly and GA appear to partially reduce BV decline over the second and third years of treatment. High dose, high frequency IFNbeta demonstrated no clear effect on BV loss during this time period. Current evidence suggests that changes in BV after immunoablation may not be due entirely to the resolution of edema but may be related to potential chemotoxicity of high dose cyclophosphamide. Natalizumab reduces the development of BV decline in the second and third years of treatment. IV immunoglobulin showed a positive effect on decelerating BV reduction in relapsing and advanced stages of MS. These differences between DMAs may be explained by the extent of their therapeutic effects on inflammation and on the balance between inhibition or promotion of remyelination and neuronal repair in the CNS. We described the mechanisms of action by which DMAs induce accelerated, non-tissue-related BV loss (pseudoatrophy) in the short term but, in the long run, may still potentially lead to permanent BV decline. The effects of corticosteroid therapy on changes in BV in patients with MS help clarify the mechanisms through which potent anti-inflammatory treatments may prevent, stabilize, or induce BV loss.

1aforearlymultiplesclerosis:CHAMPStrialsubgroup analyses. Ann Neurol. 2002;51:481-490. 42. Hadjimichael O, Vollmer TL. Adherence to injection therapy in multiple sclerosis: patients survey. Neurology. 1999;52:A549. 43. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group and the University of British Columbia MS/MRI Analysis Group. Neutralizing antibodies during treatment of multiple sclerosis with interferon beta-1b: experience during the first three years. Neurology. 1996;47:889-894. 44. Malucchi S, Sala A, Gilli F, et al. Neutralizing antibodies reduce the efficacy of betaIFN during treatment of multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2004; 62:2031-2037. 45. Rudick RA, Simonian NA, Alam JA, et al. Incidence and significance of neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta-1a in multiple sclerosis: Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group (MSCRG). Neurology. 1998;50:1266-1272. 46. Rice G. The significance of neutralizing antibodies inpatientswithmultiplesclerosis treatedwith interferon beta. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:1297-1298. 47. Weinshenker BG, Bass B, Rice GP, et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis—a geographically based study, 2: predictive value of the early clinical course. Brain. 1989;112:1419-1428. 48. Weinshenker BG, Rice GPA, Noseworthy JH, et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis—a geographically based study, 3: multivariate analysis of predictive factors and models of outcome. Brain. 1991;114:1045-1056. 49. Runmarker B, Andersson C, Oden A, Andersen O. Prediction of outcome in multiple sclerosis based on multivariate models. J Neurol. 1994;241: 597-604. 50. Confavreux C, Aimard G, Devic M. Course and prognosis of multiple sclerosis assessed by the computerized data processing of 349 patients. Brain. 1980;103:281-300.

Major advancements have been achieved in our ability to diagnose multiple sclerosis (MS) and to commence treatment intervention with agents that can favorably affect the disease course. Although MS exacerbations and the emergence of disability constitute the more conspicuous aspects of the disease process, evidence has confirmed that most of the disease occurs on a constitutive and occult basis. Disease-modifying therapies appear to be modest in the magnitude of their treatment effects, particularly in the progressive stage of the disease. Therapeutic strategies currently used for MS primarily target the inflammatory cascade. Several potential mechanisms appear to be involved in the progression of MS. Characterizing these mechanisms will result in a better understanding of the various forms of the disorder and how to effectively treat its clinical manifestations. It is our objective within this 2-part series on progression in MS to offer both evidence-based observations and hypothesis-driven expert perspectives on what constitutes the cause of progression in MS. We have chosen areas of inquiry that appear to have been most productive in helping us to better conceptualize the landscape of what MS looks like pathologically, immunologically, neuroscientifically, radiographically, and genetically. We have attempted to advance hypotheses focused on a deeper understanding of what contributes to the progression of this illness and to illustrate new technical capabilities that are catalyzing novel research initiatives targeted at achieving a more complete understanding of progression in MS.

Advancements in imaging technologies and newly evolving treatments offer the promise of more effective management strategies for MS. Until recently, confirmation of the diagnosis of MS has generally required the demonstration of clinical activity that is disseminated in both time and space. Nevertheless, with the advent of MRI techniques, occult disease activity can be demonstrated in 50 to 80% of patients at the time of the first clinical presentation. Prospective studies have shown that the presence of such lesions predicts future conversion to clinically definite (CD) MS. Indeed, in a young to middle-aged adult with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), once alternative diagnoses are excluded at baseline, the finding of three or more white matter lesions on a T2-weighted MRI scan (especially if one of these lesions is located in the periventricular region) is a very sensitive predictor (>80%) of the subsequent development of CDMS within the next 7 to 10 years. Moreover, the presence of two or more gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions at baseline and the appearance of either new T2 lesions or new Gd enhancement on follow-up scans are also highly predictive of the subsequent development of CDMS in the near term. By contrast, normal results on MRI at the time of clinical presentation makes the future development of CDMS considerably less likely.