Search

Background: In lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), the use of small-molecule inhibitors, chemotherapy and immunotherapy has led to unprecedented survival benefits in selected patients. Considering most patients will experience a relapse within a short period of time due to single drug resistance, combination therapy is also particularly important to improve patient prognosis. Therefore, more robust biomarkers to predict responses to immunotherapy, targeted therapy, chemotherapy and rationally drug combination therapies may be helpful in clinical treatment choices. Methods: We defined tumor-specific T cells (TSTs) and their features (TSTGs) by single-cell RNA sequencing. We applied LASSO regression to filter out the most survival-relevant TSTGs to form the Tumor-specific T cell score (TSTS). Immunological characteristics, enriched pathways, and mutation were evaluated in high- and low TSTS groups. Results: We identified six clusters of T cells as TSTs in LUAD, and four most robust genes from 9 feature genes expressed only on tumor-specific T cells were screened to construct a tumor-specific T cells score (TSTS). TSTS was positively correlated with immune infiltration and angiogenesis and negatively correlated with malignant cell proliferation. Moreover, potential vascular-immune crosstalk in LUAD provides the theoretical basis for combined anti-angiogenic and immunotherapy. Lachnoclostridium affect Hyaluronidase and promotes immune infiltration in the high TSTS group through CXCL16-CXCR6 between myeloid and T cells. Noticeable, patients in high TSTS had better response to ICB and targeted therapy and patients in the low TSTS group often benefit from chemotherapy. Conclusions: The proposed TSTS is a promising indicator to predict immunotherapy, targeted therapy and chemotherapy responses in LUAD patients for helping clinical treatment choices.

Detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is one real dilemma owing to the non-sufficient tissue for testing EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinoma. A model for predicting EGFR mutations would be helpful for clinical decisions in those patients. A retrospective cohort of 1,196 patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma was investigated between December 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019, in Renji Hospital, Shanghai, China. All patients were tested for EGFR mutations (amplification refractory mutation system, n = 1,144; next-generation sequence, n = 52). Of 1,196 patients with lung adenocarcinoma, 944 met the inclusion criteria. A nomogram model was developed based on 567 patients and validated in 377 patients. Variables associated with EGFR mutations were age, sex, smoking history, lepidic predominant subtype, solid predominant subtype, mucinous adenocarcinoma, Ki67 expression, lobulation, solid texture in radiology, and pleural retraction. The nomogram based on the model performed well in the development group (c-index 0.789, 95% CI: 0.751-0.827), and the validation group (c-index 0.809, 95% CI: 0.771-0.847). At the probability cut-point of 0.7, the diagnostic efficiency was 82.7% in patients with NGS liquid biopsy. Decision curve analysis (DCA) further confirmed the clinical usefulness of the nomogram, which showed that predicting the EGFR mutations probability applying this nomogram would be better than having all patients or none patients use this nomogram. A high probability group (> 0.7) by nomogram model may suggest a high possibility of EGFR mutation, if tissue is limited, NGS-based ctDNA with liquid biopsy could be implemented effectively.

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has induced a worldwide epidemiological event with a high infectivity and mortality. However, the predicting biomarkers and their potential mechanism in the progression of COVID-19 are not well known. Objective The aim of this study is to identify the candidate predictors of COVID-19 and investigate their underlying mechanism. Methods The retrospective study was conducted to identify the potential laboratory indicators with prognostic values of COVID-19 disease. Then, the prognostic nomogram was constructed to predict the overall survival of COVID-19 patients. Additionally, the scRNA-seq data of BALF and PBMCs from COVID-19 patients were downloaded to investigate the underlying mechanism of the most important prognostic indicators in lungs and peripherals, respectively. Results In total, 304 hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients in Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital were included in the retrospective study. CEA was the only laboratory indicator with significant difference in the univariate (P Conclusion This study identifies the prognostic roles of CEA in COVID-19 patients and implies the potential roles of CEACAM8-CEACAM6 in the progression of COVID-19 by regulating the cell–cell communication of developing neutrophils and type II pneumocyte.

BACKGROUND: As a global pandemic, COVID-19 has aroused great concern in the last few months and a growing number of related researches have been published. Therefore, a bibliometric analysis of these publications may provide a direction of hot topics and future research trends. METHODS: The global literatures about COVID-19 published between 2019 and 2020 were scanned in the Web of Science collection database. “COVID-19” “Novel Coronavirus” “2019-nCoV” and “SARS-CoV-2” were used as the keywords to reach the relevant publications. VOSviewer was applied to perform the bibliometric analysis of these articles. RESULTS: Totally 3,626 publications on the topic of COVID-19 were identified and “COVID-19” with a total link strength of 2,649 appeared as the most frequent keyword, which had a strong link to “pneumonia” and “epidemiology”. The mean citation count of the top 100 most cited articles was 96 (range, 26–883). Most of them were descriptive studies and concentrated on the clinical features. The highest-ranking journal was British medical journal with 211 publications and the most cited journal was Lancet with 2,485 citation counts. Eleven articles written by Christian Drosten from Berlin Institute of Virology have been cited for 389 times and 40 articles from Chinese Academy of Sciences have been cited for 1,597 times which are the most cited author and organization. The number of collaborators with China is 44 and the total link strength is 487. The main partners of China are USA, England and Germany. The published literatures have focused on three topics: disease management, clinical features and pathogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: The current growth trends predict a large increase in the number of global publications on COVID-19. China made the most outstanding contribution within this important field. Disease treatment, spike protein and vaccine may be hotspots in the future.