1. Transabdominal ultrasonography to reduce the burden of X‐ray imaging in prophylactic pancreatic stent localization after ERCP—A prospective trial
- Author
-
Georg Dultz, Florian Alexander Michael, Jörg Bojunga, Anna-Lena Laguna de la Vera, Ludmilla Gerber, Philipp Stoffers, Mireen Friedrich-Rust, Peter Marton Hunyady, Nada Abedin, Stefan Zeuzem, N Weiler, and Natalie Filmann
- Subjects
Male ,endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ,medicine.medical_treatment ,pancreatitis ,Pancreatic stent ,Postoperative Complications ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,Prospective Studies ,transabdominal ,Ultrasonography ,Aged, 80 and over ,Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ,Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Esophagogastroduodenoscopy ,Gastroenterology ,Middle Aged ,Intention to Treat Analysis ,X‐ray imaging ,surgical procedures, operative ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,Stents ,Original Article ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Radiology ,Pancreas ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,medicine ,Humans ,cardiovascular diseases ,Device Removal ,Aged ,Pancreatic duct ,business.industry ,Pancreatic Ducts ,Stent ,Endoscopy ,equipment and supplies ,medicine.disease ,Radiography ,prophylactic pancreatic stent ,Feasibility Studies ,Pancreatitis ,business - Abstract
Background Before performing endoscopy to remove prophylactic pancreatic stents placed in patients with high risk of post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP), X‐ray imaging is recommended to confirm the stents position in the pancreatic duct. Objectives The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of prophylactic pancreatic stent detection by transabdominal ultrasonography, to reduce the burden of X‐ray imaging, which is currently the golden standard. Methods All patients who received a pancreatic stent for PEP prophylaxis were included in the present prospective trial. First, stent position was determined by transabdominal ultrasonography. Afterwards, it was verified by X‐ray imaging. Retained stents were removed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Dislocated stents needed no further intervention. Results Fourty‐one patients were enrolled in this study. All prophylactic pancreatic stents were straight 6 cm long 5 Fr stents with external flap. All stents were removed between day 1 and 10 (median: 3 days) in all cases. In 34 of 41 cases (83.0%), the pancreatic stent was still in place on the day of examination. Twenty‐nine of 34 (85.3%) stents were detected correctly by transabdominal ultrasonography. Overlying gas prevented visualization of the pancreas in 3/41 (7.3%) cases. Sensitivity of sonographic detection of the stent was 93.5% (29/31). Six of seven stents were determined correctly as dislocated by ultrasonography. Here, specificity was 85.7%. A positive predictive value of 96.7% (29/30) was examined. The negative predictive value was 75.0% (6/8). Conclusion Transabdominal ultrasonography detects the majority of prophylactic pancreatic stents. Thereby, it helps to identify patients with an indication for endoscopy sufficiently. X‐ray imaging could subsequently be omitted in about 70% of examinations, reducing the radiation exposure for the patient and the endoscopy staff.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF