Search

The fifth author's name is indexed incorrectly. The author's name should be indexed as Sørensen TIA. The correct citation is: Vinther JL, Cadman T, Avraam D, Ekstrøm CT, Sørensen TIA, Elhakeem A, et al. (2023) Gestational age at birth and body size from infancy through adolescence: An individual participant data meta-analysis on 253, 810 singletons in 16 birth cohort studies. PLoS Med 20(1): e1004036. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004036.

Background: Early-life respiratory tract infections might affect chronic obstructive respiratory diseases, but conclusive studies from general populations are lacking. Our objective was to examine if children with early-life respiratory tract infections had increased risks of lower lung function and asthma at school age. Methods: We used individual participant data of 150 090 children primarily from the EU Child Cohort Network to examine the associations of upper and lower respiratory tract infections from age 6 months to 5 years with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, forced expiratory flow at 75% of FVC (FEF75%) and asthma at a median (range) age of 7 (4-15) years. Results: Children with early-life lower, not upper, respiratory tract infections had a lower school-age FEV1, FEV1/FVC and FEF75% (z-score range: -0.09 (95% CI -0.14- -0.04) to -0.30 (95% CI -0.36- -0.24)). Children with early-life lower respiratory tract infections had a higher increased risk of school-age asthma than those with upper respiratory tract infections (OR range: 2.10 (95% CI 1.98-2.22) to 6.30 (95% CI 5.64-7.04) and 1.25 (95% CI 1.18-1.32) to 1.55 (95% CI 1.47-1.65), respectively). Adjustment for preceding respiratory tract infections slightly decreased the strength of the effects. Observed associations were similar for those with and without early-life wheezing as a proxy for early-life asthma. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that early-life respiratory tract infections affect development of chronic obstructive respiratory diseases in later life, with the strongest effects for lower respiratory tract infections. A comprehensive list of grant funding is available on the ALSPAC website (www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf). BAMSE: BAMSE was funded by the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, ALF Region Stockholm and SFO Epidemiology Karolinska Institutet. E. Mélen is supported by a European Research Council grant (TRIBAL, 757919). BiB (Born in Bradford): BiB is only possible because of the enthusiasm and commitment of the children and parents in BiB. We are grateful to all the participants, practitioners and researchers who have made BiB happen. The BiB study presents independent research commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC) and the Programme Grants for Applied Research funding scheme (RP-PG-0407-10044). Core support for BiB is also provided by the Wellcome Trust (WT101597MA). BILD: This study was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (320030_163311). CoNER: Funds were obtained from the special programme (Programmi speciali – Art.12 bis, comma 6 D.lgs.229/99 Sanitaria e della Vigilanza sugli Enti) funded by the Italian Ministry of Health. Approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the S. Orsola-Malpighi Teaching Hospital in April 2004 (52/2004/U/Tess). COPSAC 2000 and COPSAC 2010: All funding received by COPSAC is listed on www.copsac.com. The Lundbeck Foundation (R16-A1694), Ministry of Health (903516), Danish Council for Strategic Research (0603-00280B) and Capital Region Research Foundation have provided core support to the COPSAC research centre. We express our deepest gratitude to the children and families of the COPSAC 2000 and COPSAC 2010 cohort studies for all their support and commitment. We acknowledge and appreciate the unique efforts of the COPSAC research team. DNBC (Danish National Birth Cohort): The authors would like to thank the participants, the first Principal Investigator of DNBC, Jørn Olsen, the scientific managerial team and DNBC secretariat for being, establishing, developing and consolidating the DNBC. The DNBC was established with a significant grant from the Danish National Research Foundation. Additional support was obtained from the Danish Regional Committees, Pharmacy Foundation, Egmont Foundation, March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, Health Foundation and other minor grants. The DNBC Biobank has been supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation and Lundbeck Foundation. Follow-up of mothers and children has been supported by the Danish Medical Research Council (SSVF 0646, 271-08-0839/06-066023, O602-01042B, 0602-02738B), Lundbeck Foundation (195/04, R100-A9193), Innovation Fund Denmark 0603-00294B (09-067124), Nordea Foundation (02-2013-2014), Aarhus Ideas (AU R9-A959-13-S804), University of Copenhagen Strategic Grant (IFSV 2012) and Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF-4183-00594, DFF-4183-00152). A. Pinot de Moira is funded by a Lundbeck Foundation grant (R264-2017-3099). EDEN: We thank the EDEN mother–child cohort study group (I. Annesi-Maesano, J.Y. Bernard, J. Botton, M.A. Charles, P. Dargent-Molina, B. de Lauzon-Guillain, P. Ducimetière, M. de Agostini, B. Foliguet, A. Forhan, X. Fritel, A. Germa, V. Goua, R. Hankard, B. Heude, M. Kaminski, B. Larroque†, N. Lelong, J. Lepeule, G. Magnin, L. Marchand, C. Nabet, F. Pierre, R. Slama, M.J. Saurel-Cubizolles, M. Schweitzer and O. Thiebaugeorges). We thank all funding sources for the EDEN study (not allocated for the present study but for the cohort): Foundation for Medical Research (FRM), National Agency for Research (ANR), National Institute for Research in Public health (IRESP: TGIR cohorte santé 2008 programme), French Ministry of Health (DGS), French Ministry of Research, INSERM Bone and Joint Diseases National Research (PRO-A) and Human Nutrition National Research Programs, Paris-Sud University, Nestlé, French National Institute for Population Health Surveillance (InVS), French National Institute for Health Education (INPES), the European Union FP7 programmes (FP7/2007-2013, HELIX, ESCAPE, ENRIECO, MeDALL projects), Diabetes National Research Program (in collaboration with the French Association of Diabetic Patients (AFD)), French Agency for Environmental Health Safety (now ANSES), Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale complementary health insurance (MGEN), French national agency for food security, and French speaking association for the study of diabetes and metabolism (ALFEDIAM). The funding source had no involvement in the conception of the present study. FLEHS: This study was conducted within the framework of the Flemish Centre of Expertise on Environment and Health, funded by the Dept of the Environment of the Flemish Government, Flemish Agency of Care and Health, and Flemish Dept of Economy, Science and Innovation. GASPII: The GASPII cohort was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health (2001), the research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Program under grant agreement 261357 (MeDALL). Generation R: This study was funded by Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam and the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development. V.W.V. Jaddoe received a grant from the European Research Council (ERC-2014-CoG-648916). L. Duijts received funding from cofunded ERA-Net on Biomarkers for Nutrition and Health (ERA HDHL), Horizon 2020 (696295; 2017), the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw; 529051014; 2017), Science Foundation Ireland (SFI/16/ERA-HDHL/3360), and European Union (ALPHABET project). The project received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (LIFECYCLE, 733206, 2016; EUCAN-Connect 824989; ATHLETE, 874583). The researchers are independent from the funders. The study sponsors had no role in the study design, data analysis, interpretation of data or writing of this report. Generation XXI: Generation XXI was supported by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Operational Programme Competitiveness and Internationalization and national funding from the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education, and by the Unidade de Investigação em Epidemiologia – Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto (EPIUnit) (UIDB/04750/2020), Administração Regional de Saúde Norte (Regional Dept of Ministry of Health) and Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. A.C. Santos is founded by FCT Investigator contracts IF/01060/2015. GINI: The GINIplus study was mainly supported for the first 3 years by the Federal Ministry for Education, Science, Research and Technology (interventional arm) and Helmholtz Zentrum München (former GSF) (observational arm). The 4- and 6-year follow-up examinations of the GINIplus study were covered from the respective budgets of the five study centres (Helmholtz Zentrum München (former GSF), Research Institute at Marien-Hospital, Wesel, LMU Munich, TU Munich and from 6 years onwards also from IUF – Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine at the University of Düsseldorf). HUMIS: We thank all mothers for participating in the HUMIS study. HUMIS was funded by a grant from the Norwegian Research Council (226402). The HUMIS study was approved by the Norwegian Data Inspectorate (2002/1398) and by the Regional Ethics Committee for Medical Research in Norway (S-02122), and the specific use in the current study was approved by the Ethics Committee as well (2010/1259/REK sør-øst). INMA: Gipuzkoa: This study was funded by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FIS-PI09/00090, FIS-PI18/01142 including FEDER funds), CIBERESP, Dept of Health of the Basque Government (2013111089) and annual agreements with the municipalities of the study area (Zumarraga, Urretxu, Legazpi, Azkoitia y Azpeitia and Beasain). Menorca: This study was funded by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Red INMA G03/176; CB06/02/0041; 97/0588; 00/0021-2, PI061756; PS0901958, PI14/00677 including FEDER funds), CIBERESP, Beca de la IV convocatoria de Ayudas a la Investigación en Enfemerdades Neurodegeneratives de La Caixa, and EC contract QLK4-CT-200-00263. Sabadell: This study was funded by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Red INMA G03/176; CB06/02/0041; PI041436; PI081151 including FEDER funds), Generalitat de Catalunya-CIRIT 1999SGR 00241 and Fundació La marató de TV3 (090430). ISGlobal is a member of the CERCA Programme, Generalitat de Catalunya. M. Casas holds a Miguel Servet fellowship (CP16/00128) funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III and cofunded by the European Social Fund “Investing in your future”. Valencia: This study was funded by grants from the European Union (FP7-ENV-2011 cod 282957 and HEALTH.2010.2.4.5-1), Spain: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Red INMA G03/176, CB06/02/0041; FIS-FEDER: PI03/1615, PI04/1509, PI04/1112, PI04/1931, PI05/1079, PI05/1052, PI06/1213, PI07/0314, PI09/02647, PI11/01007, PI11/02591, PI11/02038, PI13/1944, PI13/2032, PI14/00891, PI14/01687, PI16/1288, PI17/00663; Miguel Servet-FEDER CP11/00178, CP15/00025, CPII16/00051), Generalitat Valenciana: FISABIO (UGP 15-230, UGP-15-244, UGP-15-249), and Alicia Koplowitz Foundation 2017. Isle of Wight: This study was funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health USA (R01HL082925), Asthma UK (364), Isle of Wight NHS Trust and the British Medical Association. KOALA: The collection of data relevant for this study was funded by grants from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw; 2100.0090) and the Netherlands Asthma Foundation (3.2.03.48, 3.2.07.022). The researchers are independent from the funders. The funders had no role in the study design, data analysis, interpretation of data or writing of this report. We thank the children and parents for their participation in the KOALA study. LRC (Leicestershire Respiratory Cohorts): This study was funded by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF: 320030-182628, 320030-162820, 3233-069348, 3200-069349) and Asthma UK 07/048. Lifeways Cross-Generation Cohort Study: This study was funded by the Health Research Board, Ireland, and the Irish Dept of Health and Children's Health Promotion Policy Unit. LISA: The LISA study was mainly supported by grants from the Federal Ministry for Education, Science, Research and Technology and in addition from Helmholtz Zentrum München (former GSF), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig, Research Institute at Marien-Hospital Bad Honnef for the first 2 years. The 4-, 6-, 10- and 15-year follow-up examinations of the LISA study were covered from the respective budgets of the involved partners (Helmholtz Zentrum München (former GSF), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig, Research Institute at Marien-Hospital Wesel, Pediatric Practice, Bad Honnef, IUF – Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine at the University of Düsseldorf) and in addition by a grant from the Federal Ministry for Environment (IUF Düsseldorf, FKZ 20462296). Further, the 15-year follow-up examination of the LISA study was supported by the Commission of the European Communities, the Seventh Framework Program: MeDALL project. This project has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (949906). LucKi: LucKi is supported by Child and Youth Health Care Zuyderland, Public Health Service South Limburg and Maastricht University. We thank all parents and children for their participation in LucKi. LUKAS: This study was funded by research grants from the Academy of Finland (139021, 287675, 296814, 296817, 308254); Juho Vainio Foundation; EVO/VTR funding; Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation; Farmers’ Social Insurance Institution (Mela); Finnish Cultural Foundation; Foundation for Pediatric Research; European Union QLK4-CT-2001-00250; and Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland. MAS-90: This study was funded by grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (MBMF; 07015633m 07ALE27, 01EE9405/5, 01EE9406) and the German Research Foundation (DFG; KE1462/2-1). Millennium Cohort Study: This study was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and a consortium of UK government funders. We are grateful to the participating families and the Centre for Longitudinal Studies (CLS), UCL Institute of Education, for the use of these data and to the UK Data Service for making them available. However, neither CLS nor the UK Data Service bear any responsibility for the analysis or interpretation of these data. This work was supported by the Welcome Trust (187389/B/08/Z). MoBa: The Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study is supported by the Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services and Ministry of Education and Research. We are grateful to all the participating families in Norway who take part in this ongoing cohort study. This research was supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme (262700). NINFEA: The authors are grateful to all the participants of the NINFEA cohort. The NINFEA study was partially funded by the Compagnia San Paolo Foundation. This research was partially funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (LIFECYCLE, 733206). PELAGIE: We are grateful to the families who participated and continue to participate in the study. The cohort is supported by INSERM and received funding from the French National Research Agency, Fondation de France, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, National Institute for Public Health Surveillance (InVS), French Ministry of Labour, and French Ministry of Ecology. PIAMA: This study was funded by the Netherlands Organisation of Health Research and Development, Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Netherlands Asthma Fund, Netherlands Ministry of Spatial Planning, Housing and the Environment, and Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport. REPRO_PL: This study was funded by the National Science Center Poland (DEC-2014/15/B/N27/00998). Rhea: This study was funded by the European Union Social Fund and the Hellenic Ministry of Health (“Program of prevention and early diagnosis of obesity and neurodevelopment disorders in preschool age children in the prefecture of Heraklion, Crete, Greece”; MIS 349580, NSRF 2007–2013). Additional funding from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) supported L. Chatzi (R01ES030691, R01ES029944, R01ES030364, R21ES029681, R21ES028903, P30ES007048). STEPS: This study was funded by the University of Turku, Abo Akademi University, Turku University Hospital, Academy of Finland (123571, 140251, 277535) and Foundation for Pediatric Research Finland. SWS: This study was funded by the Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, Arthritis Research UK, Food Standards Agency, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre and the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013), project EarlyNutrition (289346), and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (LIFECYCLE, 733206). WHISTLER: The WHISTLER birth cohort was supported with a grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (2001-1-1322) and by an unrestricted grant from GlaxoSmithKline Netherlands. GlaxoSmithKline had no role in study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, and in the decision to submit the report for publication. WHISTLER-Cardio was supported with an unrestricted strategic grant from the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU).

bjectiveThe MAMAACT intervention aims to reduce ethnic and social disparities in stillbirth and infant death by improving communication between pregnant women and midwives regarding warning signs of pregnancy complications. This study evaluates the effect of the intervention on pregnant women's health literacy (two domains from the Health Literacy Questionnaire) and complication management — interpreted as improved health literacy responsiveness among midwives.DesignCluster randomized controlled trial, 2018–2019.Setting19 of 20 Danish maternity wards.ParticipantsCross-sectional survey data were collected using telephone interviews (n = 4150 pregnant women including 670 women with a non-Western immigrant background).InterventionA six-hour training session for midwives in intercultural communication and cultural competence, two follow-up dialog meetings, and health education materials for pregnant women on warning signs of pregnancy complications — in six languages.Main outcome measuresDifferences in mean scores at post-implementation of the domains Active engagement with healthcare providers (Active engagement) and Navigating the healthcare system from the Health Literacy Questionnaire, and differences in the certainty of how to respond to pregnancy complication signs between women in the intervention and control group.ResultsNo difference was observed in women's level of Active engagement or Navigating the healthcare system. Women from the intervention group were more certain of how to respond to complication signs: Redness, swelling, and heat in one leg: 69.4 % vs 59.1 %; aOR 1.57 (95 % CI 1.32–1.88), Severe headache: 75.6 % vs 67.3 %; aOR 1.50 (95 % CI 1.24–1.82), and Vaginal bleeding: 97.3 % vs 95.1 %; aOR 1.67 (95 % CI 1.04–2.66).ConclusionThe intervention improved women's certainty of how to respond to complication signs, but was unable to improve pregnant women's health literacy levels of Active engagement and Navigating the healthcare system, likely due to barriers related to the organization of antenatal care. A reorganization of antenatal care and a care model sensitive to diversity within the entire healthcare system might help reduce disparities in perinatal health. Objective: The MAMAACT intervention aims to reduce ethnic and social disparities in stillbirth and infant death by improving communication between pregnant women and midwives regarding warning signs of pregnancy complications. This study evaluates the effect of the intervention on pregnant women's health literacy (two domains from the Health Literacy Questionnaire) and complication management — interpreted as improved health literacy responsiveness among midwives. Design: Cluster randomized controlled trial, 2018–2019. Setting: 19 of 20 Danish maternity wards. Participants: Cross-sectional survey data were collected using telephone interviews (n = 4150 pregnant women including 670 women with a non-Western immigrant background). Intervention: A six-hour training session for midwives in intercultural communication and cultural competence, two follow-up dialog meetings, and health education materials for pregnant women on warning signs of pregnancy complications — in six languages. Main outcome measures: Differences in mean scores at post-implementation of the domains Active engagement with healthcare providers (Active engagement) and Navigating the healthcare system from the Health Literacy Questionnaire, and differences in the certainty of how to respond to pregnancy complication signs between women in the intervention and control group. Results: No difference was observed in women's level of Active engagement or Navigating the healthcare system. Women from the intervention group were more certain of how to respond to complication signs: Redness, swelling, and heat in one leg: 69.4 % vs 59.1 %; aOR 1.57 (95 % CI 1.32–1.88), Severe headache: 75.6 % vs 67.3 %; aOR 1.50 (95 % CI 1.24–1.82), and Vaginal bleeding: 97.3 % vs 95.1 %; aOR 1.67 (95 % CI 1.04–2.66). Conclusion: The intervention improved women's certainty of how to respond to complication signs, but was unable to improve pregnant women's health literacy levels of Active engagement and Navigating the healthcare system, likely due to barriers related to the organization of antenatal care. A reorganization of antenatal care and a care model sensitive to diversity within the entire healthcare system might help reduce disparities in perinatal health. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03751774.

IMPORTANCE People conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART) make up anincreasing proportion of the world’s population.OBJECTIVE To investigate the association of ART conception with offspring growth and adiposityfrom infancy to early adulthood in a large multicohort study.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study used a prespecified coordinated analysisacross 26 European, Asia-Pacific, and North American population-based cohort studies that includedpeople born between 1984 and 2018, with mean ages at assessment of growth and adiposityoutcomes from 0.6 months to 27.4 years. Data were analyzed between November 2019 andFebruary 2022.EXPOSURES Conception by ART (mostly in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, andembryo transfer) vs natural conception (NC; without any medically assisted reproduction).MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcomes were length / height, weight, and bodymass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). Each cohortwas analyzed separately with adjustment for maternal BMI, age, smoking, education, parity, andethnicity and offspring sex and age. Results were combined in random effects meta-analysis for 13age groups.RESULTS Up to 158 066 offspring (4329 conceived by ART) were included in each age-group metaanalysis, with between 47.6% to 60.6% females in each cohort. Compared with offspring who wereNC, offspring conceived via ART were shorter, lighter, and thinner from infancy to early adolescence,with differences largest at the youngest ages and attenuating with older child age. For example,adjusted mean differences in offspring weight were −0.27 (95% CI, −0.39 to −0.16) SD units at ageyounger than 3 months, −0.16 (95% CI, −0.22 to −0.09) SD units at age 17 to 23 months, −0.07 (95%CI, −0.10 to −0.04) SD units at age 6 to 9 years, and −0.02 (95% CI, −0.15 to 0.12) SD units at age 14to 17 years. Smaller offspring size was limited to individuals conceived by fresh but not frozen embryotransfer compared with those who were NC (eg, difference in weight at age 4 to 5 years was −0.14[95% CI, −0.20 to −0.07] SD units for fresh embryo transfer vs NC and 0.00 [95% CI, −0.15 to 0.15SD units for frozen embryo transfer vs NC). More marked differences were seen for body fatmeasurements, and there was imprecise evidence that offspring conceived by ART developedgreater adiposity by early adulthood (eg, ART vs NC difference in fat mass index at age older than 17years: 0.23 [95% CI, −0.04 to 0.50] SD units).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that people conceiving or conceived byART can be reassured that differences in early growth and adiposity are small and no longer evidentby late adolescence

Katia Keglberg Hærvig,1,2 Jens Peter Bonde,1,2 Cecilia Høst Ramlau-Hansen,3 Gunnar Toft,4 Karin Sørig Hougaard,2,5 Ina Olmer Specht,6 Aleksander Giwercman,7 Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen,2 Jørn Olsen,3 Christian Lindh,8 Birgit Bjerre Høyer,1,* Sandra Søgaard Tøttenborg1,* 1Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Department of Public Health, The Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; 3Department of Public Health, Research Unit for Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; 4Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 5National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark; 6The Parker Institute, Research Unit for Dietary Studies, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; 7Molecular Reproductive Medicine, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; 8Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Sandra Søgaard TøttenborgDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23F, Entrance 20F, 1st Floor, Copenhagen 2400, NV, DenmarkTel +45 23 35 58 85Email sandra.soegaard.toettenborg@regionh.dkBackground: Prenatal exposures may contribute to male infertility in adult life, but large-scale epidemiological evidence is still lacking. The Fetal Programming of Semen quality (FEPOS) cohort was founded to provide means to examine if fetal exposures can interfere with fetal reproductive development and ultimately lead to reduced semen quality and reproductive hormone imbalances in young adult men.Methods: Young adult men at least 18 years and 9 months of age born to women in the Danish National Birth Cohort living in relative proximity to Copenhagen or Aarhus and for whom a maternal blood sample and two maternal interviews during pregnancy were available wereinvited to FEPOS. Recruitment began in March 2017 and ended in December 2019. The participants answered a comprehensive questionnaire and underwent a physical examination where they delivered a semen, urine, and hair sample, measured their own testicular volume, and had blood drawn.Results: In total 21,623 sons fulfilled eligibility criteria of whom 5697 were invited and 1058 participated making the response rate 19%. Semen characteristics did not differ between sons from the Copenhagen and Aarhus clinics. When comparing the FEPOS semen parameters to similar cohorts, the median across all semen characteristics was slightly lower for FEPOS participants, although with smaller variation.Conclusion: With its 1058 young adult men, the FEPOS cohort is the largest population-based male-offspring cohort worldwide specifically designed to investigate prenatal determinants of semen quality. Wide-ranging information on maternal health, lifestyle, socioeconomic status, occupation, and serum concentrations of potential reproductive toxicants during pregnancy combined with biological markers of fertility in their sons collected after puberty allow for in-depth investigations of the ‘fetal origins of adult disease hypothesis’.Keywords: male infertility, prenatal exposure, fetal exposure, maternal-fetal exchange, semen quality, semen analysis

Background Poor growth during infancy and childhood is a characteristic feature of cystic fibrosis (CF). However, the impact of CF on intrauterine growth is unclear. We studied the effect of CF on birth weight in Denmark and Wales, and assessed whether any associations are due to differences in gestational age at birth. Methods We conducted national registry linkage studies in two countries, using data for 2.2 million singletons born in Denmark (between 1980 and 2010) and Wales (between 1998 and 2015). We used hospital inpatient and outpatient data to identify 852 children with CF. Using causal mediation methods, we estimated the direct and indirect (via gestational age) effect of CF on birth weight after adjustment for sex, parity and socioeconomic background. We tested the robustness of our results by adjusting for additional factors such as maternal smoking during pregnancy in subpopulations where these data were available. Results Babies with CF were more likely to be born preterm and with low birth weight than babies with no CF (12.7% vs 5% and 9.4% vs 5.8% preterm; 11.9% vs 4.2% and 11% vs 5.4% low birth weight in Denmark and Wales, respectively). Using causal mediation methods, the total effect of CF on birth weight was estimated to be −178.8 g (95% CI −225.43 to −134.47 g) in the Danish population and −210.08 g (95% CI −281.97 to −141.5 g) in the Welsh population. About 40% of this effect of CF on birth weight was mediated through gestational age. Conclusions CF significantly impacts on intrauterine growth and leads to lower birth weight in babies with CF, which is only partially explained by shorter gestation.

Previous studies have shown that socioeconomic position is inversely associated with stillbirth risk, but the impact on national rates in Europe is not known. We aimed to assess the magnitude of social inequalities in stillbirth rates in European countries using indicators generated from routine monitoring systems., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Background: Through the World Health Assembly Resolution, 'Health of Migrants', the international community has identified migrant health as a priority. Recommendations for general hospital care for international migrants in receiving-countries have been put forward by the Migrant Friendly Hospital Initiative; adaptations of these recommendations specific to maternity care have yet to be elucidated and validated. We aimed to develop a questionnaire measuring migrant-friendly maternity care (MFMC) which could be used in a range of maternity care settings and countries.Methods: This study was conducted in four stages. First, questions related to migrant friendly maternity care were identified from existing questionnaires including the Migrant Friendliness Quality Questionnaire, developed in Europe to capture recommended general hospital care for migrants, and the Mothers In a New Country (MINC) Questionnaire, developed in Australia and revised for use in Canada to capture the maternity care experiences of migrant women, and combined to create an initial MFMC questionnaire. Second, a Delphi consensus process in three rounds with a panel of 89 experts in perinatal health and migration from 17 countries was undertaken to identify priority themes and questions as well as to clarify wording and format. Third, the draft questionnaire was translated from English to French and Spanish and back-translated and subsequently culturally validated (assessed for cultural appropriateness) by migrant women. Fourth, the questionnaire was piloted with migrant women who had recently given birth in Montreal, Canada.Results: A 112-item questionnaire on maternity care from pregnancy, through labour and birth, to postpartum care, and including items on maternal socio-demographic, migration and obstetrical characteristics, and perceptions of care, has been created - the Migrant Friendly Maternity Care Questionnaire (MFMCQ) - in three languages (English, French and Spanish). It is completed in 45 minutes via interview administration several months post-birth.Conclusions: A 4-stage process of questionnaire development with international experts in migrant reproductive health and research resulted in the MFMCQ, a questionnaire measuring key aspects of migrant-sensitive maternity care. The MFMCQ is available for further translation and use to examine and compare care and perceptions of care within and across countries, and by key socio-demographic, migration, and obstetrical characteristics of migrant women. © 2014 Gagnon et al. licensee BioMed Central Ltd., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Background Preterm birth, low birth weight, and infant catch-up growth seem associated with an increased risk of respiratory diseases in later life, but individual studies showed conflicting results. Objectives We performed an individual participant data meta-analysis for 147,252 children of 31 birth cohort studies to determine the associations of birth and infant growth characteristics with the risks of preschool wheezing (1-4 years) and school-age asthma (5-10 years). Methods First, we performed an adjusted 1-stage random-effect meta-analysis to assess the combined associations of gestational age, birth weight, and infant weight gain with childhood asthma. Second, we performed an adjusted 2-stage random-effect meta-analysis to assess the associations of preterm birth (gestational age

Background: Preterm birth, low birth weight, and infant catch-up growth seem associated with an increased risk of respiratory diseases in later life, but individual studies showed conflicting results. Objectives: We performed an individual participant data meta-analysis for 147,252 children of 31 birth cohort studies to determine the associations of birth and infant growth characteristics with the risks of preschool wheezing (1-4 years) and school-age asthma (5-10 years). Methods: First, we performed an adjusted 1-stage random-effect meta-analysis to assess the combined associations of gestational age, birth weight, and infant weight gain with childhood asthma. Second, we performed an adjusted 2-stage random-effect meta-analysis to assess the associations of preterm birth (gestational age < 37 weeks) and low birth weight (< 2500 g) with childhood asthma outcomes. Results: Younger gestational age at birth and higher infant weight gain were independently associated with higher risks of preschool wheezing and school-age asthma (P, Supported by the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme FP7/20072013, project CHICOS. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Respiratory Society and the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013-Marie Curie Actions under grant agreement RESPIRE, PCOFUND-GA-2008-229571.

Long-term birth cohort studies are essential to understanding the life course and childhood predictors of allergy and the complex interplay between genes and the environment (including lifestyle and socioeconomic determinants). Over 100 cohorts focusing on asthma and allergy have been initiated in the world over the past 30 years. Since 2004, several research initiatives funded under the EU Framework Program for Research and Technological Development FP6-FP7 have attempted to identify, compare, and evaluate pooling data from existing European birth cohorts (GA(2)LEN: Global Allergy and European Network, FP6; ENRIECO: Environmental Health Risks in European Birth Cohorts, FP7; CHICOS: Developing a Child Cohort Research Strategy for Europe, FP7; MeDALL: Mechanisms of the Development of ALLergy, FP7). However, there is a general lack of knowledge about these initiatives and their potentials. The aim of this paper is to review current and past EU-funded projects in order to make a summary of their goals and achievements and to suggest future research needs of these European birth cohort networks.

Background Maternal obesity and excessive gestational weight gain may have persistent effects on offspring fat development. However, it remains unclear whether these effects differ by severity of obesity, and whether these effects are restricted to the extremes of maternal body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain. We aimed to assess the separate and combined associations of maternal BMI and gestational weight gain with the risk of overweight/obesity throughout childhood, and their population impact. Methods and findings We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis of data from 162,129 mothers and their children from 37 pregnancy and birth cohort studies from Europe, North America, and Australia. We assessed the individual and combined associations of maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain, both in clinical categories and across their full ranges, with the risks of overweight/obesity in early (2.0–5.0 years), mid (5.0–10.0 years) and late childhood (10.0–18.0 years), using multilevel binary logistic regression models with a random intercept at cohort level adjusted for maternal sociodemographic and lifestyle-related characteristics. We observed that higher maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain both in clinical categories and across their full ranges were associated with higher risks of childhood overweight/obesity, with the strongest effects in late childhood (odds ratios [ORs] for overweight/obesity in early, mid, and late childhood, respectively: OR 1.66 [95% CI: 1.56, 1.78], OR 1.91 [95% CI: 1.85, 1.98], and OR 2.28 [95% CI: 2.08, 2.50] for maternal overweight; OR 2.43 [95% CI: 2.24, 2.64], OR 3.12 [95% CI: 2.98, 3.27], and OR 4.47 [95% CI: 3.99, 5.23] for maternal obesity; and OR 1.39 [95% CI: 1.30, 1.49], OR 1.55 [95% CI: 1.49, 1.60], and OR 1.72 [95% CI: 1.56, 1.91] for excessive gestational weight gain). The proportions of childhood overweight/obesity prevalence attributable to maternal overweight, maternal obesity, and excessive gestational weight gain ranged from 10.2% to 21.6%. Relative to the effect of maternal BMI, excessive gestational weight gain only slightly increased the risk of childhood overweight/obesity within each clinical BMI category (p-values for interactions of maternal BMI with gestational weight gain: p = 0.038, p < 0.001, and p = 0.637 in early, mid, and late childhood, respectively). Limitations of this study include the self-report of maternal BMI and gestational weight gain for some of the cohorts, and the potential of residual confounding. Also, as this study only included participants from Europe, North America, and Australia, results need to be interpreted with caution with respect to other populations. Conclusions In this study, higher maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain were associated with an increased risk of childhood overweight/obesity, with the strongest effects at later ages. The additional effect of gestational weight gain in women who are overweight or obese before pregnancy is small. Given the large population impact, future intervention trials aiming to reduce the prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity should focus on maternal weight status before pregnancy, in addition to weight gain during pregnancy., Vincent Jaddoe and colleagues report that a high BMI before pregnancy, rather than excessive gestational weight gain, is more likely to contribute to childhood obesity., Author summary Why was this study done? Maternal pre-pregnancy obesity and excessive gestational weight gain are important risk factors of various pregnancy and birth complications. An accumulating body of evidence suggests that maternal obesity and excessive gestational weight gain also have persistent effects on offspring fat development. It is not clear whether these effects exist across the full ranges of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain, what their combined effects are, and what the population impact of these effects is. What did the researchers do and find? We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis using data from 162,129 mothers and their children from 37 pregnancy and birth cohorts from Europe, North America, and Australia to assess the separate and combined associations of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with the risk of overweight/obesity throughout childhood, and their population impact. We observed not only that maternal pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity were associated with an increased risk of childhood overweight/obesity, but that this risk increased gradually over the full range of maternal BMI. Similarly, the risk of childhood overweight/obesity increased across the full range of gestational weight gain. We estimated that 21.7% to 41.7% of childhood overweight/obesity prevalence could be attributed to maternal overweight and obesity together, whereas 11.4% to 19.2% could be attributed to excessive gestational weight gain. The additional effect of excessive gestational weight gain on the risk of childhood overweight/obesity was small among women who are already overweight or obese before pregnancy. What do these findings mean? Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and, to a smaller extent, gestational weight gain are important modifiable risk factors of childhood overweight/obesity with considerable population impact. Future intervention trials aiming to reduce the prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity should focus on maternal weight status before pregnancy, in addition to weight status during pregnancy.

ObjectiveTo assess the separate and combined associations of maternal pre‐pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain with the risks of pregnancy complications and their population impact.DesignIndividual participant data meta‐analysis of 39 cohorts.SettingEurope, North America, and Oceania.Population265 270 births.MethodsInformation on maternal pre‐pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain, and pregnancy complications was obtained. Multilevel binary logistic regression models were used.Main outcome measuresGestational hypertension, pre‐eclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm birth, small and large for gestational age at birth.ResultsHigher maternal pre‐pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain were, across their full ranges, associated with higher risks of gestational hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes, and large for gestational age at birth. Preterm birth risk was higher at lower and higher BMI and weight gain. Compared with normal weight mothers with medium gestational weight gain, obese mothers with high gestational weight gain had the highest risk of any pregnancy complication (odds ratio 2.51, 95% CI 2.31– 2.74). We estimated that 23.9% of any pregnancy complication was attributable to maternal overweight/obesity and 31.6% of large for gestational age infants was attributable to excessive gestational weight gain.ConclusionsMaternal pre‐pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain are, across their full ranges, associated with risks of pregnancy complications. Obese mothers with high gestational weight gain are at the highest risk of pregnancy complications. Promoting a healthy pre‐pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain may reduce the burden of pregnancy complications and ultimately the risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity.Tweetable abstractPromoting a healthy body mass index and gestational weight gain might reduce the population burden of pregnancy complications.

Background: Gestational diabetes and gestational hypertensive disorders are associated with offspring obesity, but the role of maternal adiposity in these associations remains unclear. We aimed to investigate whether these pregnancy complications affect the odds of offspring obesity independently of maternal obesity. Methods: We did an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of mother–offspring pairs from prospective birth cohort studies that had IPD on mothers with singleton liveborn children born from 1989 onwards and had information available about maternal gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia, and childhood body-mass index (BMI). We applied multilevel mixed-effects models to assess associations of gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, and pre-eclampsia with BMI SD scores and the odds of overweight and obesity throughout childhood, adjusting for lifestyle characteristics (offspring's sex, maternal age, educational level, ethnicity, parity, and smoking during pregnancy). We then explored the extent to which any association was explained by maternal pre-pregnancy or early-pregnancy BMI. Findings: 160 757 mother–offspring pairs from 34 European or North American cohorts were analysed. Compared with uncomplicated pregnancies, gestational diabetes was associated with increased odds of overweight or obesity throughout childhood (odds ratio [OR] 1·59 [95% CI 1·36 to 1·86] for early childhood [age 2·0–4·9 years], 1·41 [1·26 to 1·57] for mid childhood [5·0–9·9 years], and 1·32 [0·97 to 1·78] for late childhood [10·0–17·9 years]); however, these associations attenuated towards the null following adjustment for maternal BMI (OR 1·35 [95% CI 1·15 to 1·58] for early childhood, 1·12 [1·00 to 1·25] for mid childhood, and 0·96 [0·71 to 1·31] for late childhood). Likewise, gestational hypertension was associated with increased odds of overweight throughout childhood (OR 1·19 [95% CI 1·01 to 1·39] for early childhood, 1·23 [1·15 to 1·32] for mid childhood, and 1·49 [1·30 to 1·70] for late childhood), but additional adjustment for maternal BMI largely explained these associations (1·01 [95% CI 0·86 to 1·19] for early childhood, 1·02 [0·95 to 1·10] for mid childhood, and 1·18 [1·03 to 1·36] for late childhood). Pre-eclampsia was associated with decreased BMI in early childhood only (difference in BMI SD score −0·05 SD score [95% CI −0·09 to −0·01]), and this association strengthened following additional adjustment for maternal BMI. Interpretation: Although lowering maternal risk of gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, and pre-eclampsia is important in relation to maternal and fetal pregnancy outcomes, such interventions are unlikely to have a direct impact on childhood obesity. Preventive strategies for reducing childhood obesity should focus on maternal BMI rather than on pregnancy complications. Funding: EU's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (LifeCycle Project). This study has received support from the US National Institute of Health (R01 DK10324) and European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh 22 Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) / ERC grant agreement no 669545. The Swedish Research Council, The Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, The Swedish Research Council for Working Life and Social Welfare, the Swedish Asthma and Allergy Association Research Foundation, The Swedish Research Council Formas, Stockholm County Council, and the European Commission’s Seventh Framework 29 Program MeDALL under grant agreement No. 261357. This study has received support from the British Heart Foundation (CS/16/4/32482), US National Institute of Health (R01 DK10324) and European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) / ERC grant agreement no 669545. The general design of the Generation R Study is made possible by financial support from the Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport and Ministry of Youth and Families. Research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007- 2013), project EarlyNutrition under grant agreement n°289346, the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 633595 (DynaHEALTH) and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement 733206 (LifeCycle Project). European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreements Early Nutrition n° 289346 and by funds from the Norwegian Research Council's MILPAAHEL programme, project No.213148. This study was funded by Grants from UE (FP7-ENV-2011 cod 282957 and HEALTH.2010.2.4.5-1), Spain: ISCIII (G03/176; FIS-FEDER: PI09/02647, PI11/01007, PI11/02591, PI11/02038, PI13/1944, PI13/2032, PI14/00891, PI14/01687, and PI16/1288; Miguel Servet-FEDER CP11/00178, CP15/00025, and CPII16/00051), and Generalitat Valenciana: FISABIO (UGP 15-230, UGP-15-244, and UGP-15-249). The "Rhea" project was financially supported by European projects (EU FP6-2003-Food-3-NewGeneris, EU FP6. STREP Hiwate, EU FP7 ENV.2007.1.2.2.2. Project No 211250 Escape, EU FP7-2008-ENV-28.1.2.1.4 envirogenomarkers, EU FP7-HEALTH-2009- single stage CHICOS, EU FP7 ENV.2008.1.2.1.6. Proposal No 226285 ENRIECO, EU- FP7- HEALTH-2012 Proposal No 308333 HELIX) and the Greek Ministry of Health (Program of Prevention of obesity and neurodevelopmental disorders in preschool children, in Heraklion district, Crete, Greece: 2011-2014; “Rhea Plus”: Primary Prevention Program of Environmental Risk Factors for Reproductive Health, and Child Health: 2012-15). ROLO is supported by the Health Research Board Ireland, the Health Research Centre for Health and Diet Research, and the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), project EarlyNutrition under grant agreement no. 289346. The SWS is supported by grants from the Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton National Health Service Foundation Trust, and the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), project EarlyNutrition (grant 289346). Study participants were drawn from a cohort study funded by the Medical Research Council and the Dunhill Medical Trust.

Antologien er produkt af et forskningssamarbejde i Center for empirisk forskning om børns sundhed og livssti som har eksistret siden 1997. De tre institutioner der indgik i netværket var Statens Institut for Folkesundhed, Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitetsskole (dengang DLH), Afdeling for socialpsykologi og Københavsn Universitet, Institut for Folkesundhedsvidenskab. Antologien repræsenterer centerets hoveområde, interessen for social ulighed i børns sundhed.