Search

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency (RF) ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in presumably high-risk locations. Between February 1999 and December 2001, we performed RF ablation on 1419 nodules in 636 consecutive HCC patients, of which 231 nodules in 207 patients were in high-risk locations, defined as less than 5 mm from a large vessel or an extrahepatic organ. Eighty-one patients had a nodule adjacent to a large vessel, 145 patients had a nodule adjacent to an extrahepatic organ, of whom 19 also had one adjacent to a large vessel. Early complications and local tumor progression were analyzed with regard to the location of each nodule. The mean nodule diameter and average number per patient were 27 mm and 2.3, respectively. Early complications, within 30 days after ablation, occurred in 12 of 207 patients (5.8%) with a nodule in a high-risk location and in 15 of 429 patients (3.5%) without (P = .1776). There was no significant difference in local tumor progression rate between nodules in high-risk locations (1 year: 2.1%, 2 years: 3.1%, 3 years: 3.1%) and those elsewhere (1 year: 0.6%, 2 years: 1.7%, 3 years: 2.5%) (P = .2745). In conclusion, HCC nodules adjacent to a large vessel or extrahepatic organ were treated with RF ablation without compromising the efficacy of the procedure. However, even though without significant difference, some complications occurred at risky locations and need to be carefully considered.

The dropout from the waiting list for liver transplantation among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is reportedly as high as 12% to 40% per year, mostly due to tumor progression. Considering the scarcity of donor organs, it would be beneficial if we could retain them within the Milan criteria with a bridging therapy. We retrospectively analyzed the prognosis of 288 HCC patients with relatively preserved liver function we treated with ablation therapy between 1997 and 2001, concentrating on whether they subsequently remained in the criteria, and analyzed the risk factors of dropout with Cox proportional hazards model. During a median follow-up period of 39 months (range, 1–86 months), 33 (11%) died without tumor progression, while 85 (30%) dropped out due to tumor progression. The overall dropout rate was 9.0% and 32.8% at 1 and 3 years, respectively, and that due to tumor progression was 6.2% and 23.0%. Cox regression analysis indicated that a high serum level of alpha-fetoprotein or des-γ-carboxy prothrombin, and a tumor size exceeding 3 cm in diameter affected the dropout due to tumor progression, while low albumin concentration was a risk factor of death independently of tumor progression. In conclusion, local ablation therapy for HCC was effective in containing the tumor progression within the Milan criteria in selected patients. (Liver Transpl 2005;11:508–514.)

Background and aims The role of alphafetoprotein (AFP) in the diagnosis and surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is getting smaller owing to the advances in imaging modalities. The aims of this study were to assess the diagnostic accuracy of tumor markers in small HCC and to find the optimal cutoff value of each tumor marker for efficient surveillance. Methods Studies in all languages were identified by searching MEDLINE from 1982 to 2002. Studies were included when they showed sensitivity and specificity for HCCs 5 cm or smaller and recruited only patients with chronic hepatitis or liver cirrhosis as control. We assessed diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) for the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of tumor markers and positive likelihood ratios (LRs+) to find the optimal cutoff value. DORs and LRs+ were combined according to the random effect model. The summary receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was also assessed. Results Seventeen articles on three tumor markers—AFP, des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin (DCP), and Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of AFP (AFP-L3)—were enrolled after full-text evaluation. AFP was inferior to DCP and AFP-L3 in both DOR (4.50 vs. 8.16 and 10.50) and area under the ROC curve (0.647 vs. 0.688 and 0.695). Optimal cutoff values that provide the best LR+ were 200 ng/ml for AFP, 40 mAU/ml for DCP, and 15% for AFP-L3. Conclusions Diagnostic accuracy of AFP in small HCC was substantially limited. Surveillance including other tumor markers with optimal cutoff value should be conducted to confirm the efficacy of the policy.

Background and Aim: Impaired health-related quality of life has been reported in patients with cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis. However, only limited data are available concerning the influence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: Health-related quality of life was assessed in 97 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who had been treated successfully with percutaneous ablation therapy, and 97 patients with chronic liver disease without hepatocellular carcinoma matched for age and sex, using the Japanese version of Short-Form 36. Raw scores were transformed using norm-based scoring. The relations with objective variables including status of hepatocellular carcinoma and laboratory data were analyzed. Results: Health-related quality of life was lower in both groups than in the general population. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and patients in the control group showed similar scores. By multivariate analysis, liver function, especially serum albumin, strongly predicted health-related quality of life, but status of hepatocellular carcinoma did not. Conclusions: Impaired health-related quality of life was not associated with the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma but dependent on the level of liver function, indicating the importance of preserving liver function in following up patients. Serum albumin level was a useful objective variable to assess health-related quality of life of patients with chronic liver disease.