Search

There is concern regarding the competency of today's general surgery graduates as a large proportion defer independent practice in favor of additional fellowship training. Little is known about the graduates who directly enter general surgery practice and if their operative experiences during residency differ from graduates who pursue fellowship.Nineteen Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited general surgery programs from the US Resident OPerative Experience Consortium were included. Demographics, career choice, and case logs from graduates between 2010 to 2020 were analyzed.There were 1,264 general surgery residents who graduated over the 11-year period. A total of 248 (19.6%) went directly into practice and 1,016 (80.4%) pursued fellowship. Graduates directly entering practice were more likely to be a high-volume resident (43.1% vs 30.5%, P.01) and graduate from a high-volume program (49.2% vs 33.0%, P.01). Direct-to-practice graduates performed 53 more cases compared with fellowship-bound graduates (1,203 vs 1,150, P.01). On multivariable analysis, entering directly into practice was positively associated with total surgeon chief case volume (odds ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.84, P.01) and graduating from a US medical school (odds ratio = 2.54, 95% confidence interval 1.45-4.44, P.01) while negatively associated with completing a dedicated research experience (odds ratio = 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.45, P.01).This is the first multi-institutional study exploring resident operative experience and career choice. These data suggest residents who desire immediate practice can tailor their experience with less research time and increased operative volume. These data may be helpful for programs when designing their experience for residents with different career goals.

Gastrosplenic fistula (GSF) is seen secondary to the development of a fistulous track between the stomach and spleen and/or splenic vessels. It is most commonly seen in patients with diffuse B-cell lymphoma, who usually present with symptoms of abdominal pain and weight loss. GSF has also been seen in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, peptic ulcer disease, splenic abscesses, and post gastric sleeve resection. Less than 25% of the patients with GSF may present with upper gastrointestinal bleed (UGIB). This presentation of GSF is common with benign causes including peptic ulcer disease. UGIB secondary to GSF, while rare, requires prompt identification and intervention, to avoid catastrophic outcomes. We discuss the case of a 64-year-old female with GSF, who presented with sentinel bleed followed by hemorrhagic shock, secondary to a B-cell lymphoma, who was managed with a partial gastrectomy, splenectomy, and distal pancreatectomy, with favorable outcomes.

Objectives Non-traumatic lower extremity amputation (LEA) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Diabetes mellitus (DM) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) are associated with increased risk for LEA. As such, DM and PVD account for 54% of all LEA’s, performed in the United States annually. As obesity is highly associated with both DM and PVD, our study sought to explore the relationship between LEA and obesity defined by BMI. Methods Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, a retrospective review of patients who underwent non-traumatic LEA (LEA) between 2008 and 2014 was performed. The International Classification of Diseases 9th edition (ICD-9) codes were utilized to determine the diagnoses, comorbidities, and procedures. Patient BMIs were classified as follows: Non-obese [BMI Results We identified 16,259 patients with non-traumatic LEA and a mean age of 59.9 years. Rate of amputation in females was lower than males at 0.35% vs 0.87% respectively ( p < 0.001). Of patients that underwent amputation there was a V-shape trend based on BMI, with 30.4% in non-obese patients, 18.2% in obesity class I, 17.3% in obesity class II, and 34.1% in obesity class III. The incidence of diabetes increased with obesity class, while the incidence of PVD decreased. Interestingly, of those with DM there was an inverse relationship between amputation rate and BMI class, with LEA rates in non-obese versus obesity class III patients were 1.63% vs 0.98% respectively ( p < 0.001). Similarly, patients who had both diabetes and PVD showed a downward trend in LEA rate as obesity class increased; non-obese patients had a LEA rate of 8.01%, while obesity class III had 4.65% ( p < 0.001). Patients in higher income bracket have lower odds of LEA (OR 0.77, p < 0.001) compared to the lowest income patients. Also, patients with comorbidities such as PVD (OR 10.78), diabetes (OR 5.02), renal failure (OR 1.41), and hypertension (OR 1.36) had higher odds to get an LEA ( p < 0.001). Individuals with obesity class III are almost at half the odds (OR 0.52) to get an LEA compared to non-obese ( p < 0.001). Conclusions Higher BMI and female gender are protective factors against lower extremity amputation. Factors that predisposing to LEA include lower household income and certain comorbidities such as PVD, diabetes, renal failure, and hypertension. These findings warrant further research to identify patients at high risk for LEA and help develop management guidelines for targeted populations.