1. Quality indicator survey versus traditional survey in New York State: a comparison of results from annual nursing home surveys
- Author
-
Roger C. Fiedler, Lisa Rafalson, Joanne I Hernick, and Colleen Moore Delaney
- Subjects
Certification ,Nursing staff ,media_common.quotation_subject ,New York ,Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S ,03 medical and health sciences ,030502 gerontology ,Environmental health ,Humans ,Medicine ,Quality (business) ,Life-span and Life-course Studies ,Quality Indicators, Health Care ,Quality of Health Care ,Demography ,media_common ,business.industry ,Data Collection ,030503 health policy & services ,Significant difference ,United States ,Nursing Homes ,Health Care Surveys ,Government Regulation ,0305 other medical science ,Nursing homes ,business ,Gerontology ,Medicaid - Abstract
Despite the passage of OBRA'87 for nursing home reform, concerns about care in facilities continue. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid developed new regulations and the Traditional Survey (TS) process for annual nursing home survey. The survey is conducted by state regional offices to determine facility compliance with federal regulations. Despite the regulations and new survey process, the TS inconsistently identified problems. A computerized process called the Quality Indicator Survey (QIS) was subsequently developed. This study was designed to compare results from TS and QIS on overall deficiencies, select quality indicators, high-severity deficiencies, and severity differences of seven quality indicators in New York State over a 6-year period from 2010 through 2015. Results of t-tests determined a significant difference in the overall mean number of deficiencies (p .001), and on four indicators: choices (p .001), nursing staff (p .001), dental (p .001), and dignity (p .05). Facilities using the TS showed a higher mean number of harm level or higher deficiencies (p .001). Chi-square tests for severity levels showed significantly more higher severity deficiencies on two quality indicators: nutrition (p 0.001) and hydration (p 0.05). Thus, the QIS produced a greater mean number of deficiencies, while TS produced more higher severity deficiencies in New York State.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF