Search

Scoping review.To identify and provide systematic overviews of partnership principles and strategies identified from health research about spinal cord injury (SCI) and related health conditions.Four health electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO) were searched from inception to March 2019. We included articles that described, reflected, and/or evaluated one or more collaborative research activities in health research about SCI, stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, amputation, cerebral palsy, spina bifida, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, acquired brain injury, or wheelchair-users. Partnership principles (i.e. norms or values) and strategies (i.e. observable actions) were extracted and analyzed using directed qualitative content analysis.We included 39 articles about SCI (n = 13), stroke (n = 15), multiple sclerosis (n = 5), amputation (n = 2), cerebral palsy (n = 2), Parkinson's disease (n = 1), and wheelchair users (n = 1). We extracted 110 principles and synthesized them into 13 overarching principles. Principles related to building and maintaining relationships between researchers and research users were most frequently reported. We identified 32 strategies that could be applied at various phases of the research process and 26 strategies that were specific to a research phase (planning, conduct, or dissemination).We provided systematic overviews of principles and strategies for research partnerships. These could be used by researchers and research users who want to work in partnership to plan, conduct and/or disseminate their SCI research. The findings informed the development of the new SCI Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles (www.iktprinciples.com) and will support the implementation of these Principles within the SCI research system.

Reactive balance control following hand perturbations is important for everyday living as humans constantly encounter perturbations to the upper limb while performing functional tasks while standing. When multiple tasks are performed simultaneously, cognitive processing is increased, and performance on at least one of the tasks is often disrupted, owing to attentional resources being divided. The purpose here was to assess the effects of increased cognitive processing on whole-body balance responses to perturbations of the hand during continuous voluntary reaching. Sixteen participants (8 females; 22.9 ± 4.5 years) stood and grasped the handle of a KINARM - a robotic-controlled manipulandum paired with an augmented visual display. Participants completed 10 total trials of 100 mediolateral arm movements at a consistent speed of one reach per second, and an auditory n-back task (cognitive task). Twenty anteroposterior hand perturbations were interspersed randomly throughout the reaching trials. The arm movements with random arm perturbations were either performed simultaneously with the cognitive task (combined task) or in isolation (arm perturbation task). Peak centre of pressure (COP) displacement and velocity, time to COP displacement onset and peak, as well as hand displacement and velocity following the hand perturbation were evaluated. N-back response times were 8% slower and 11% less accurate for the combined than the cognitive task. Peak COP displacement following posterior perturbations increased by 8% during the combined compared to the arm perturbation task alone, with no other differences detected. Hand peak displacement decreased by 5% during the combined compared to the arm perturbation task. The main findings indicate that with increased cognitive processing, attentional resources were allocated from the cognitive task towards upper limb movements, while attentional resources for balance seemed unaltered.

There is growing concern repetitive head contacts sustained by soccer players may lead to long-term health ramifications. Therefore, this preliminary investigation examined the impact an acute soccer heading bout has on dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) metrics.In this preliminary investigation, 40 successful soccer headers were performed in 20 min by 7 male elite soccer players (24.1 ± 1.5 years). Soccer balls were launched at 77.5 ± 3.7 km/h from JUGS soccer machine, located 35 m away from participants. Linear and rotational head accelerations impacts were measured using an accelerometer (xPatch). The SCAT3 indexed concussion symptom score and severity before and after: soccer headers, sham (body contact only), and control conditions. Squat-stand maneuvers were performed at 0.05 Hz and 0.10 Hz to quantity dCA through measures of coherence, phase, and gain.Cumulative linear and rotational accelerations during soccer headers were 1574 ± 97.9 g and 313,761 ± 23,966 rads/sThese preliminary results indicate an acute bout of soccer heading resulted in alterations to dCA metrics. Therefore, future research with larger sample sizes is warranted to fully comprehend short- and long-term physiological changes related to soccer heading.

Objective: The current investigation examined how a bout of soccer heading may impact brain function. Design: Semi-randomized crossover cohort. Setting: Controlled soccer heading. Participants: Seven male soccer players (24.1 ± 1.5 years). Intervention: 40 successful soccer headers were performed in 20 min (25 m, launch velocity ~80 km/h). X2 xPatch recorded linear and rotational head accelerations during each impact. A contact control “sham” condition – ball made body contact, but not by the head; and a no activity time “control” condition were also completed. Main Outcome Measures: Posterior and middle cerebral artery (PCA and MCA, respectively), cerebral blood velocity (CBV) was recorded during a visual task (neurovascular coupling: NVC) alongside SCAT3 symptoms scores pre/post a controlled bout of soccer heading. Results: Cumulative linear and rotational accelerations were 1,574 ± 97.9 g and 313,761 ± 23,966 rads/s2, respectively, during heading and changes in SCAT3 symptom number (pre: 2.6 ± 3.0; post: 6.7 ± 6.2, p = 0.13) and severity (pre: 3.7 ± 3.6, post: 9.4 ± 7.6, p = 0.11) were unchanged. In the PCA, no NVC differences were observed, including: relative CBV increase (28.0 ± 7.6%, p = 0.71) and total activation (188.7 ± 68.1 cm, p = 0.93). However, MCA-derived NVC metrics were blunted following heading, demonstrating decreased relative CBV increase (7.8 ± 3.1%, p = 0.03) and decreased total activation (26.7 ± 45.3 cm, p = 0.04). Conclusion: Although an acute bout of soccer heading did not result in an increase of concussion-like symptoms, there were alterations in NVC responses within the MCA during a visual task. This suggests an acute bout of repetitive soccer heading can alter CBV regulation within the region of the brain associated with the header impacts.

Movement complexity is known to increase reaction time (RT). More recently, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex has revealed that movement complexity can alter corticospinal excitability. However, the impact of a sequential addition of movement components on corticospinal excitability during the preparatory phase of a simple RT task is unknown. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine how motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the premotor period were affected by the complexity of a movement in a simple RT paradigm. Participants (n = 12) completed ballistic movements with their dominant arm, in which they directed a robotic handle to one, two or three targets (32 trials per condition). TMS was delivered prior to movement at 0, 70, 80 or 90% of each participant's mean premotor RT, at the stimulator intensity which yielded a triceps brachii MEP of ~ 10% the maximal M-wave. As expected, premotor RT slowed with increasing task complexity. Although background electromyographic activity (EMG) of the triceps brachii during the preparation phase did not differ among conditions, MEP amplitude increased with movement complexity (i.e., MEPs were greater for the 2- and 3-movement conditions, compared to the 1-movement condition at 80% of premotor RT). We propose the lengthened RTs could be due in part to less suppression of particular motor circuits, while other circuitry is responsible for the increased MEPs. This study demonstrates that, prior to movement, corticospinal excitability increases as a consequence of movement complexity.

The central nervous system preplans postural responses to successfully perform complex multi-joint movements. These responses have been termed anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs), and they constitute a general type of response to stabilize posture prior to movement initiation. APA sequences are elicited with shorter latency when a startling acoustic stimulus is applied, demonstrating their preplanned nature. Increasing task complexity using a simple reaction time (RT) paradigm has been shown to delay limb movement RT as a result of additional planning or sequencing requirements; however, the effect of task complexity on APA dynamics is unclear. The purpose of the present study was to investigate if task complexity modulates APA onset in a manner analogous to that observed in the primary effector. 13 participants completed 150 trials of simple (1-target) and complex (2- or 3-target) arm movements while standing on a force plate. Results indicated participants had significantly faster arm movement RTs in the simple versus the most complex condition. Similar to the primary effector, APA RTs were longer in the most complex (3-target) movement compared to both the 1-target and 2-target movements. Furthermore, APA excursion velocities were scaled to the complexity of the upcoming movement: the rate of APAs increased from simplest to most complex movements. These findings clearly demonstrate APAs are sensitive to task complexity, further elucidating their preplanned role in stabilizing posture which enables the successful completion of intended movements.

In the present study we investigated how attention contributes to the interaction between reach planning and execution, and postural control. Reaching movements were generated while standing and were performed either in isolation or in conjunction with a secondary reaction time (RT) task. In addition, to better understand how online movement control is affected by this interaction, the reaching movements could be unexpectedly perturbed medial-laterally. Postural kinetic, arm kinematic and RT, and secondary RT measures were used to characterize the responses. Results indicate task performance worsened when both the reaching and secondary tasks were completed simultaneously. Our results imply the generation of reaching movements while standing requires attentional resources to properly coordinate the interaction between the reaching task and postural control.

The current study examined the process of response initiation in a simple reaction time (RT) task using a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS), which has been shown to trigger a prepared movement through an involuntary initiation pathway. The SAS was presented within the RT interval (concurrent with, and 25, 50, 75, 100, and 125 ms following the “go” signal), with the observed response latency used to examine the relative contributions of voluntary and involuntary activation to response initiation. Our results clearly indicate that both voluntary and startle-related initiation activation jointly contribute to the observed RT. The data support a model in which startle-related neural activity is additive with voluntary cortical initiation-related activation. This result also provides indirect support for the hypothesis that both voluntary and SAS-related involuntary activation involve a similar process of response output.

Targeted reciprocal aiming movements are pervasive in everyday life, but it is unclear how the timing parameters between task elements affect the preparation of these movements. This study used a loud (124 dB) startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) to probe how changes in the pause time between the outward and return components of a reciprocal aiming task affected the preparatory state of the motor system. Participants performed a visually guided wrist extension–flexion task to a target located at 20° from the start position and were instructed to pause the movement within the wrist extension target zone for either 50, 200, or 500 ms. A SAS was presented during 25 % of trials before either the onset of the wrist extension (out) or flexion (return) components of the task to determine how motor preparation was affected by task requirements. Results showed that the presentation of a SAS prior to the initial outward movement led to significantly earlier onsets of both the outward and return components (p

Increasing the complexity of a movement has been shown to result in longer simple reaction time (RT), which has been attributed to sequencing or timing requirements following the go-signal. However, RT differences may also be due to differences in corticospinal excitability (CE) as previous studies have found an enhanced excitatory state of corticospinal neurons in complex tasks. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used in the present study to probe the excitability of the motor pathway during the simple RT interval for single (simple) versus multiple (complex) key press responses. Premotor RT data indicated that participants responded significantly (p

The production of movement in a simple reaction time task can be separated into two time periods: the foreperiod, which is thought to include preparatory processes, and the reaction time interval, which includes initiation processes. To better understand these processes, transcranial magnetic stimulation has been used to probe corticospinal excitability at various time points during response preparation and initiation. Previous research has shown that excitability decreases prior to the “go” stimulus and increases following the “go”; however these two time frames have been examined independently. The purpose of this study was to measure changes in CE during both the foreperiod and reaction time interval in a single experiment, relative to a resting baseline level. Participants performed a button press movement in a simple reaction time task and excitability was measured during rest, the foreperiod, and the reaction time interval. Results indicated that during the foreperiod, excitability levels quickly increased from baseline with the presentation of the warning signal, followed by a period of stable excitability leading up to the “go” signal, and finally a rapid increase in excitability during the reaction time interval. This excitability time course is consistent with neural activation models that describe movement preparation and response initiation.