1. Long-term efficacy of metal versus plastic stents in inoperable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; a multicenter retrospective propensity score matched comparison
- Author
-
Jeska A. Fritzsche, David M. de Jong, Jasmijn J.M.M. Borremans, Marco J. Bruno, Otto M. Van Delden, Joris I. Erdmann, Paul Fockens, Peter G.M. de Gooyer, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Adriaan Moelker, Nahid S.M. Montazeri, Lynn E. Nooijen, Cyriel Y. Ponsioen, Roy L.J. Van Wanrooij, Lydi M.J.W. van Driel, Rogier P. Voermans, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ACS - Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, CCA -Cancer Center Amsterdam, Surgery, CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, CCA - Imaging and biomarkers, Oncology, AII - Cancer immunology, CCA - Cancer biology and immunology, General Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and hepatology, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, and Radiology & Nuclear Medicine
- Subjects
Hepatology ,Gastroenterology - Abstract
BACKGROUND: For palliative drainage of inoperable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) uncovered metal stents are preferred over plastic stents. However, there is a lack of data on re-interventions at the long-term. The aim is to evaluate the potential difference in the number of re-interventions in patients surviving at least 6 months.METHODS: Retrospective study including patients with pCCA who underwent plastic stent placement(s) or had metal stent(s) in situ for at least 6 months. The primary outcome was the number of re-interventions per patient-year. A propensity score matching (1:1) analysis was performed using age, Bismuth classification, reason for inoperability, pathological confirmation, systemic therapy and initial approach (endoscopic vs percutaneous).RESULTS: Patients in the metal stent group (n = 87) underwent fewer re-interventions compared with the plastic stent group (n = 40) (3.0 vs. 4.7 per patient-year; IRR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.88). When only non-elective re-interventions were included, there was no significant difference (2.1 vs. 2.7; IRR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.08). Results were similar in the propensity score-matched dataset.CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that, also in patients with inoperable pCCA who survive at least 6 months, placement of metal stent(s) leads to fewer re-interventions in comparison with plastic stents.
- Published
- 2023