1. Improving quality in nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity testing by a tiered inter-laboratory comparison study
- Author
-
Kenneth A. Dawson, Arno C. Gutleb, Stefania Meschini, Bénédicte Trouiller, Maria Grazia Ammendolia, Jean-Pascal Piret, Anna Salvati, África González-Fernández, Ghislaine Lacroix, Louise Rocks, Nastassja Lewinski, Vicki Stone, Silvia Diabaté, Carsten Weiss, Marco Venturini, An Jacobs, Christian Riebeling, Michael Riediker, Jan Topinka, Hanny Willems, Maria Dusinska, Servane Contal, Tamara Lozano-Fernández, Marek Nocuń, Anna Huk, Táňa Brzicová, Nilesh Kanase, Inge Nelissen, Maciej Stępnik, Joachim O. Rädler, Sergio Anguissola, Andreas Luch, Olivier Toussaint, Silvia Milani, Andrea Haase, Federico Benetti, Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), Périnatalité et Risques Toxiques - UMR INERIS_I 1 (PERITOX), Université de Picardie Jules Verne (UPJV)-CHU Amiens-Picardie-Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques, Biopharmaceuticals, Discovery, Design and Delivery (BDDD), Nanotechnology and Biophysics in Medicine (NANOBIOMED), Nanomedicine & Drug Targeting, and School of Materials Science and Engineering
- Subjects
Life sciences ,biology ,Computer science ,General Chemical Engineering ,media_common.quotation_subject ,best practice ,Positive control ,02 engineering and technology ,Article ,3204.03 Salud Profesional ,lcsh:Chemistry ,03 medical and health sciences ,2302 Bioquímica ,Tier 2 network ,ddc:570 ,Cytotoxicity testing ,General Materials Science ,Quality (business) ,Inter-laboratory ,nanosafety ,030304 developmental biology ,media_common ,0303 health sciences ,training ,Nanotechnology [Engineering] ,Cell growth rate ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,Tier 1 network ,lcsh:QD1-999 ,[SDV.TOX]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Toxicology ,Comparison study ,cytotoxicity ,Biochemical engineering ,3214 Toxicología ,0210 nano-technology ,inter-laboratory comparison - Abstract
The quality and relevance of nanosafety studies constitute major challenges to ensure their key role as a supporting tool in sustainable innovation, and subsequent competitive economic advantage. However, the number of apparently contradictory and inconclusive research results has increased in the past few years, indicating the need to introduce harmonized protocols and good practices in the nanosafety research community. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate if best-practice training and inter-laboratory comparison (ILC) of performance of the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) assay for the cytotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials among 15 European laboratories can improve quality in nanosafety testing. We used two well-described model nanoparticles, 40-nm carboxylated polystyrene (PS-COOH) and 50-nm amino-modified polystyrene (PS-NH2). We followed a tiered approach using well-developed standard operating procedures (SOPs) and sharing the same cells, serum and nanoparticles. We started with determination of the cell growth rate (tier 1), followed by a method transfer phase, in which all laboratories performed the first ILC on the MTS assay (tier 2). Based on the outcome of tier 2 and a survey of laboratory practices, specific training was organized, and the MTS assay SOP was refined. This led to largely improved intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility in tier 3. In addition, we confirmed that PS-COOH and PS-NH2 are suitable negative and positive control nanoparticles, respectively, to evaluate impact of nanomaterials on cell viability using the MTS assay. Overall, we have demonstrated that the tiered process followed here, with the use of SOPs and representative control nanomaterials, is necessary and makes it possible to achieve good inter-laboratory reproducibility, and therefore high-quality nanotoxicological data. European Commission | Ref. EC FP7 QualityNano (INFRA-2010-1.1.31- 262163) Fonds National de la Recherche of Luxembourg | Ref. NANION (FNR / 12 / SR / 4009651) Direction générale opérationnelle de l’Economie, de l’Emploi et de la Recherche (Walloon, Belgium) | Ref. ‘QNano’ (2011-14) n. 1117448 Norwegian Research Council | Ref. NorNANoREG 239199/070
- Published
- 2020