Search

Repeated blood sampling is required in certain clinical and research settings, which is currently performed by drawing blood from venous catheters requiring manual handling of each sample at time of collection. A novel body-worn device for repeated serial samples, Fluispotter®, with automated extraction, collection and storage of up to 20 venous dried blood spot samples over the course of 20 hours may overcome problems with current methods for serial sampling. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance and safety of Fluispotter for the first time in healthy subjects. Fluispotter consists of a cartridge with tubing, reservoir for flushing solution, pumps and filter-paper and a multi-lumen catheter placed in the brachial vein. We recruited healthy subjects for testing in an in-hospital setting. Fluispotter was attached by an anesthesiologist to 22 healthy subjects of which 9/22 (40.9 %) participants had all 20 samples taken, which was lower than the goal of complete sampling in 80 % of the subjects (p = 0.02). The main reason for sample failure was clogging of blood flow which was observed in 11/22 (50 %) of the participants. No serious adverse events occurred, and the participants rated the pain from insertion and removal of catheter as very low. A cortisol profile showed nadir values at midnight and highest values at 5 a.m. Although full sampling was not successful in all participants, the Fluispotter technology proved safe and highly acceptable to the participants producing the expected cortisol profile without the requirement of staff during sample collection.

IntroductionWe investigated humoral and T-cell responses within 12 months after first BNT162b2 vaccine in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and controls who had received at least three vaccine doses. Furthermore, we compared the immune response in participants with and without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.MethodsWe included adult liver, lung, and kidney transplant recipients, and controls were selected from a parallel cohort of healthcare workers.ResultsAt 12th-month, the IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) (PConclusionIn conclusion, humoral and T-cell responses were inferior in SOT recipients without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection but comparable to controls in SOT recipients with previous infection.

Research question: Is anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) associated with live birth rate (LBR) in women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)?Design: Cohort study of women with unexplained RPL attending the RPL Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark, between 2015 and 2021. AMH concentration was assessed upon referral, and LBR in the next pregnancy. RPL was defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses. Regression analyses were adjusted for age, number of previous losses, body mass index, smoking, treatment with assisted reproductive technology (ART) and RPL treatments.Results: A total of 629 women were included; 507 (80.6%) became pregnant after referral. Pregnancy rates were similar for women with low and high AMH compared to women with medium AMH (81.9, 80.3 and 79.7%, respectively) (low AMH: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-2.47, P = 0.18; high AMH: aOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.59-1.64, P = 0.95). AMH concentrations were not associated with live birth. LBR was 59.5% in women with low AMH, 66.1% with medium AMH and 65.1% with high AMH (low AMH: aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.41-1.11, P = 0.12, high AMH: aOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.59-1.56, P = 0.87). Live birth was lower in ART pregnancies (aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.97, P = 0.04) and with higher numbers of previous losses (aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.95, P = 0.01).Conclusion: In women with unexplained RPL, AMH was not associated with the chances of live birth in the next pregnancy. Screening for AMH in all women with RPL is not supported by current evidence. The chance of live birth among women with unexplained RPL achieving pregnancy by ART was low and needs to be confirmed and explored in future studies. Research question: Is anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) associated with live birth rate (LBR) in women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)?Design: Cohort study of women with unexplained RPL attending the RPL Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark, between 2015 and 2021. AMH concentration was assessed upon referral, and LBR in the next pregnancy. RPL was defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses. Regression analyses were adjusted for age, number of previous losses, body mass index, smoking, treatment with assisted reproductive technology (ART) and RPL treatments.Results: A total of 629 women were included; 507 (80.6%) became pregnant after referral. Pregnancy rates were similar for women with low and high AMH compared to women with medium AMH (81.9, 80.3 and 79.7%, respectively) (low AMH: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-2.47, P = 0.18; high AMH: aOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.59-1.64, P = 0.95). AMH concentrations were not associated with live birth. LBR was 59.5% in women with low AMH, 66.1% with medium AMH and 65.1% with high AMH (low AMH: aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.41-1.11, P = 0.12, high AMH: aOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.59-1.56, P = 0.87). Live birth was lower in ART pregnancies (aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.97, P = 0.04) and with higher numbers of previous losses (aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.95, P = 0.01).Conclusion: In women with unexplained RPL, AMH was not associated with the chances of live birth in the next pregnancy. Screening for AMH in all women with RPL is not supported by current evidence. The chance of live birth among women with unexplained RPL achieving pregnancy by ART was low and needs to be confirmed and explored in future studies.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are crucial in controlling COVID-19, but knowledge of which factors determine waning immunity is limited. We examined antibody levels and T-cell gamma-interferon release after two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine or a combination of ChAdOx1-nCoV19 and BNT162b2 vaccines for up to 230 days after the first dose. Generalized mixed models with and without natural cubic splines were used to determine immunity over time. Antibody responses were influenced by natural infection, sex, and age. IgA only became significant in naturally infected. A one-year IgG projection suggested an initial two-phase response in those given the second dose delayed (ChAdOx1/BNT162b2) followed by a more rapid decrease of antibody levels. T-cell responses correlated significantly with IgG antibody responses. Our results indicate that IgG levels will drop at different rates depending on prior infection, age, sex, T-cell response, and the interval between vaccine injections. Only natural infection mounted a significant and lasting IgA response.

BackgroundPrevious studies have indicated inferior responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We examined the development of anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) immunoglobulin G (IgG) after two doses of BNT162b2b in SOT recipients 6 months after vaccination and compared to that of immunocompetent controls.MethodsWe measured anti-RBD IgG after two doses of BNT162b2 in 200 SOT recipients and 200 matched healthy controls up to 6 months after first vaccination. Anti-RBD IgG concentration and neutralizing capacity of antibodies were measured at first and second doses of BNT162b2 and 2 and 6 months after the first dose. T-cell responses were measured 6 months after the first dose.ResultsIn SOT recipients, geometric mean concentration (GMC) of anti-RBD IgG increased from first to second dose (1.14 AU/ml, 95% CI 1.08–1.24 to 11.97 AU/ml, 95% CI 7.73–18.77) and from second dose to 2 months (249.29 AU/ml, 95% CI 153.70–385.19). Six months after the first vaccine, anti-RBD IgG declined (55.85 AU/ml, 95% CI 36.95–83.33). At all time points, anti-RBD IgG was lower in SOT recipients than that in controls. Fewer SOT recipients than controls had a cellular response (13.1% vs. 59.4%, p < 0.001). Risk factors associated with humoral non-response included age [relative risk (RR) 1.23 per 10-year increase, 95% CI 1.11–1.35, p < 0.001], being within 1 year from transplantation (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.30–1.85, p < 0.001), treatment with mycophenolate (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.09–2.18, p = 0.015), treatment with corticosteroids (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.10–1.90, p = 0.009), kidney transplantation (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.25–2.30, p = 0.001), lung transplantation (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.16–2.29, p = 0.005), and de novo non-skin cancer comorbidity (RR 1.52, 95% CI, 1.26–1.82, p < 0.001).ConclusionImmune responses to BNT162b2 are inferior in SOT recipients compared to healthy controls, and studies aiming to determine the clinical impact of inferior vaccine responses are warranted.