1. Biosensor for Detecting Fetal Growth Restriction in a Low-Resource Setting
- Author
-
Sofie Lykke Møller, Bjarke Lund Sørensen, Anders Jacobsen, Christentze Schmiegelow, John Lusingu, Omari A Msemo, Morten Hedegaard, Diana Riknagel, D Minja, Birgitte Bruun Nielsen, and Karsten Nielsen
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,intrauterine growth restriction ,Low resource ,placental dysfunction ,Intrauterine growth restriction ,Ocean Engineering ,fetal growth restriction ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Doppler flow ,Placental dysfunction ,Fetal growth ,Medicine ,uteroplacental blood flow ,antenatal screening ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Water Science and Technology ,Full Term ,Pregnancy ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,business.industry ,Obstetrics ,Geology ,medicine.disease ,maternal vascular malperfusion ,Cohort ,prenatal diagnostics ,business - Abstract
One strategy for improving detection of fetal growth restriction (FGR) is developing biosensors identifying placental dysfunction as a leading pathogenesis for FGR. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the performance of a biosensor specified to detect placental dysfunction by means of maternal arterial turbulence acoustics in a low-resource setting. A cohort of 147 singleton pregnant women were prospectively followed with double-blinded biosensor tests, sonographic estimation of fetal weight (EFW) and Doppler flow at 26–28, 32–34 and 37–39 weeks of pregnancy. Full term live births with recorded birth weights (BWs) and without major congenital malformations were included. Outcomes were defined as (A) a solitary biometric measure (BW <, 3rd centile) and as (B) a biometric measure and contributory functional measure (BW <, 10th centile and antenatally detected umbilical artery pulsatility index >, 95th centile). Data from 118 women and 262 antenatal examinations were included. Mean length of pregnancy was 40 weeks (SD ± 8 days), mean BW was 3008 g (SD ± 410 g). Outcome (A) was identified in seven (6%) pregnancies, whereas outcome (B) was identified in one (0.8%) pregnancy. The biosensor tested positive in five (4%) pregnancies. The predictive performance for outcome (A) was sensitivity = 0.29, specificity = 0.97, p = 0.02, positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.40 and negative predictive value (NPV) was 0.96. The predictive performance was higher for outcome (B) with sensitivity = 1.00, specificity = 0.97, p = 0.04, PPV = 0.20 and NPV = 1.00. Conclusively, these pilot-study results show future potential for biosensors as screening modality for FGR in a low-resource setting.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF