The Laryngoscope C 2015 The American Laryngological, V Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. How I Do It Using Google Glass to Solve Communication and Surgical Education Challenges in the Operating Room Omid Moshtaghi, BS; Kanwar S. Kelley, MD, JD; William B. Armstrong, MD; Yaser Ghavami, MD; Jeffery Gu, BS; Hamid R. Djalilian, MD Key Words: Google glass, otolaryngology, surgery, wearable technology, camera. Laryngoscope, 125:2295–2297, 2015 INTRODUCTION Although the use of video recording became popu- larized in otolaryngology beginning in 1959, a new generation of wearable technology has evolved. 1 One of these technologies includes a device called Google Glass (Google, Inc., Mountain View, CA), hereafter referred to simply as Glass. This device allows the capture of video from the perspective of the wearer. In addition, it provides an interface to access the Inter- net, communicate with others, and use applications hands free—relying mostly on voice commands. Google is not the only company developing wearable technol- ogy; other products such as Vuzix Smart Glasses M100 (Rochester, NY) have similar features to Glass. 2 Despite the many existing products, none is as popular and as widely implemented for use in medicine as Glass, which has been used experimentally in special- ties including primary care, dermatology, and pediatric surgery. 3–5 With this in mind, we set out to demon- strate the utility of this technology specifically within the context of otolaryngologic surgery. Furthermore, we utilized Glass to assess the potential to augment surgical education and enhance communication with the surgical team. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patient Population Three different physicians were tracked as they performed a wide range of otolaryngologic procedures to demonstrate the efficacy of Glass in various operative settings. A neurotologist, head and neck surgeon, and a general otolaryngologist were fol- lowed. Written consent was obtained from every patient before Glass was used. Procedures involving only endoscopes and microscopes were not included in this study. Device Glass connects to a computer or smartphone via Bluetooth or a wireless network, providing users with the ability to access the Internet in a hands-free manner. By means of a 720p high- definition camera and microphone, Glass records video and audio while giving the user control via various voice commands. 6 Addi- tionally, a bone-conduction speaker conveys sound to the user (Fig. 1). The device requires a wireless network in the hospital for fast streaming of video; however, an additional battery pack was used for this study to allow for longer usage during surgery. In addition, the device in our study was stripped of the inte- grated social media software to prevent accidental upload of sur- gical video on social media sites. Currently, Glass is sold only in the Explorer edition, a beta version of the product, which is being sold for $1,500 on the Google Play store. 7 RESULTS Benefits of Glass: Real-Time Intraoperative Uses Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article. From the Division of Neurotology and Skull base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery ( O . M ., K . S . K ., W . B . A ., Y . G ., J . G ., H . R . D .); and the Department of Biomedical Engineering ( H . R . D .), University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, U.S.A. Editor’s Note: This Manuscript was accepted for publication February 12, 2015. The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose. Send correspondence to Hamid R. Djalilian, MD, Director of Otology, Neurotology, and Skull Base Surgery, University of California Irvine, 101 City Drive South, Bldg 56, Ste 500, Orange, CA 92868. E-mail: hdjalili@uci.edu DOI: 10.1002/lary.25249 Laryngoscope 125: October 2015 Communication. During head-and-neck cancer surgery, Glass proved to be useful to the surgeon. As an example, during one procedure involving a laryngeal cancer, the surgeon utilized Glass to speak to another physician at a remote location for an intraoperative con- sultation. Despite proving its use for communication, in this instance the physician at the remote location was not able to visualize the epiglottis through the video feed. Further follow-up studies are necessary to explore how much anatomy the viewer can distinguish. During another case involving an auricular squa- mous cell carcinoma and an application called Pristine, Moshtaghi et al.: Using Google Glass in the Operating Room