Search

Recent observational and theoretical work on solar wind turbulence and dissipation suggests that kinetic-scale fluctuations are both heating and isotropizing the solar wind during transit to 1 AU. The nature of these fluctuations and associated heating processes are poorly understood. Whatever the dissipative process that links the fields and particles - Landau damping, cyclotron damping, stochastic heating, or energization through coherent structures - heating and acceleration of ions and electrons occurs because of electric field fluctuations. The dissipation due to the fluctuations depends intimately upon the temporal and spatial variations of those fluctuations in the plasma frame. In order to derive that distribution in the plasma frame, one must also use magnetic field and density fluctuations, in addition to electric field fluctuations, as measured in the spacecraft frame (s/c) to help constrain the type of fluctuation and dissipation mechanisms that are at play.We present here an analysis of electromagnetic fluctuations in the solar wind from MHD scales down to electron scales based on data from the Artemis spacecraft at 1 AU. We focus on a few time intervals of pristine solar wind, covering a reasonable range of solar wind properties (temperature ratios and anisotropies; plasma beta; and solar wind speed). We analyze magnetic, electric field, and density fluctuations from the 0.01 Hz (well in the inertial range) up to 1 kHz. We compute parameters such as the electric to magnetic field ratio, the magnetic compressibility, magnetic helicity, compressibility and other relevant quantities in order to diagnose the nature of the fluctuations at those scales between the ion and electron cyclotron frequencies, extracting information on the dominant modes composing the fluctuations. We also use the linear Vlasov-Maxwell solver PLUME to determine the various relevant modes of the plasma with parameters from the observed solar wind intervals. These results are supplemented by analysis of fully nonlinear kinetic simulations of decaying turbulence at small scales. We discuss the results and highlight the relevant modes as well as the major differences between our results in the solar wind and results in the magnetosheath.

The Van Allen Probes mission operations materialized through a distributed model in which operational responsibility was divided between the Mission Operations Center (MOC) and separate instrument specific SOCs. The sole MOC handled all aspects of telemetering and receiving tasks as well as certain scientifically relevant ancillary tasks. Each instrument science team developed individual instrument specific SOCs proficient in unique capabilities in support of science data acquisition, data processing, instrument performance, and tools for the instrument team scientists. In parallel activities, project scientists took on the task of providing a significant modeling tool base usable by the instrument science teams and the larger scientific community. With a mission as complex as Van Allen Probes, scientific inquiry occurred due to constant and significant collaboration between the SOCs and in concert with the project science team. Planned cross-instrument coordinated observations resulted in critical discoveries during the seven-year mission. Instrument cross-calibration activities elucidated a more seamless set of data products. Specific topics include post-launch changes and enhancements to the SOCs, discussion of coordination activities between the SOCs, SOC specific analysis software, modeling software provided by the Van Allen Probes project, and a section on lessons learned. One of the most significant lessons learned was the importance of the original decision to implement individual team SOCs providing timely and well-documented instrument data for the NASA Van Allen Probes Mission scientists and the larger magnetospheric and radiation belt scientific community.

Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) observations during an extended crossing of the Earth’s dayside magnetopause show evidence of multiple reconnection at the boundary. This crossing occurred when the IMF was southward and had a significant BY component. Approximately two hours after this crossing, the Twin Rocket Investigation of Cusp Electrodynamics-2 (TRICE-2) rockets were launched into the northern hemisphere cusp and observed overlapping cusp ion injections. These overlapping injections are also evidence of multiple reconnection at the magnetopause. While the observations more than 2 hours apart do not constitute a conjunction between the spacecraft and the rockets, the IMF conditions during the magnetopause crossing and the cusp traversal were very similar. Therefore, had the magnetopause crossings and cusp traversals occurred at the same time, the observations would have been similar. This talk describes these observations and shows the link between multiple reconnection at the magnetopause and overlapping cusp ion injections. In addition, the global consequences on the magnetosphere from this link are discussed.

Recent observational and theoretical work on solar wind turbulence and dissipation suggests that kinetic-scale fluctuations are both heating and isotropizing the solar wind during transit to 1 AU. The nature of these fluctuations and associated heating processes are poorly understood. Whatever the dissipative process that links the fields and particles - Landau damping, cyclotron damping, stochastic heating, or energization through coherent structures - heating and acceleration of ions and electrons occurs because of electric field fluctuations. The dissipation due to the fluctuations depends intimately upon the temporal and spatial variations of those fluctuations in the plasma frame. In order to derive that distribution in the plasma frame, one must also use magnetic field and density fluctuations, in addition to electric field fluctuations, as measured in the spacecraft frame (s/c) to help constrain the type of fluctuation and dissipation mechanisms that are at play.We present here an analysis of electromagnetic fluctuations in the solar wind from MHD scales down to electron scales based on data from the Artemis spacecraft at 1 AU. We focus on a few time intervals of pristine solar wind, covering a reasonable range of solar wind properties (temperature ratios and anisotropies; plasma beta; and solar wind speed). We analyze magnetic, electric field, and density fluctuations from the 0.01 Hz (well in the inertial range) up to 1 kHz. We compute parameters such as the electric to magnetic field ratio, the magnetic compressibility, magnetic helicity, compressibility and other relevant quantities in order to diagnose the nature of the fluctuations at those scales between the ion and electron cyclotron frequencies, extracting information on the dominant modes composing the fluctuations. We also use the linear Vlasov-Maxwell solver, PLUME, to determine the various relevant modes of the plasma with parameters from the observed solar wind intervals. We discuss the results and the relevant modes as well as the major differences between our results in the solar wind and results in the magnetosheath.

Parker Solar Probe (PSP) aims at exploring the nascent solar wind close to the Sun. Meanwhile, PSP is also expected to encounter small objects like comets and asteroids. In this work, we survey the ephemerides to find a chance of recent encounter, and then model the interaction between released dusty plasmas and solar wind plasmas. On 2019 September 2, a comet-like object 322P/SOHO just passed its perihelion flying to a heliocentric distance of 0.12 au, and swept by PSP at a relative distance as close as 0.025 au. We present the dynamics of dust particles released from 322P, forming a curved dust tail. Along the PSP path in the simulated inner heliosphere, the states of plasma and magnetic field are sampled and illustrated, with the magnetic field sequences from simulation results being compared directly with the in-situ measurements from PSP. Through comparison, we suggest that 322P might be at a deficient activity level releasing limited dusty plasmas during its way to becoming a “rock comet”. We also present images of solar wind streamers as recorded by WISPR, showing an indication of dust bombardment for the images superposed with messy trails. We observe from LASCO coronagraph that 322P was transiting from a dimming region to a relatively bright streamer during its perihelion passage, and simulate to confirm that 322P was flying from relatively faster to slower solar wind streams, modifying local plasma states of the streams.

Electron scattering by chorus and hiss waves is an important mechanism that can lead to fast electron acceleration and loss in the inner magnetosphere. Making use of Van Allen Probes measurements, we present the factors found recently to affect the efficiency and control the predominance of the precipitation or acceleration regimes. The dependence of VLF waves frequency on latitude [1], so that the relative wave frequency goes down, leads to decreasing the electron scattering resonance latitudes. This provides an effective increase of wave amplitude due to whistler-mode wave amplitude distribution on latitude. High latitude wave extent and wave amplitude distribution on latitude determine the regime of scattering (higher latitudes) or acceleration (lower latitudes). Wave normal angle distribution and the existence of the significant oblique whistler population influence efficiency of electron scattering affects significantly the scattering rates and potentially shifts the wave-particle interaction regime during geomagnetic storms from mostly scattering to mostly acceleration [2]. Dynamics of plasma characteristics during disturbed periods, such as ωpe/Ωce decreases (especially in the night sector) sometimes leading to very short time scales for quasi‐linear MeV electron acceleration in agreement with Van Allen Probes observations [3]. ωpe/Ωce dynamics in the plasmasphere increases the efficiency of electron scattering by hiss. References[1] Agapitov et al. (2018) Journal of Geophysical Research, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024843[2] Artemyev et al., (2016). Space Science Reviews, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-016-0252-5[3] Agapitov et al., (2019) Geophysical Research Letters, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083446

第8回極域科学シンポジウム/個別セッション：[OS] 宙空圏12月5日（火）国立極地研究所 1階交流アトリウムThe Eighth Symposium on Polar Science/Ordinary sessions: [OS] Space and upper-atmosphere sciencesTue. 5 Dec./Entrance Hall (1st floor), National Institute of Polar Research