1. Economic impact of treating invasive mold disease with isavuconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B in the UK
- Author
-
Emma Bagshaw, J Posthumus, D. Kuessner, Michael Blackney, and David A Enoch
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Microbiology (medical) ,Drug ,Posaconazole ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Antifungal Agents ,economic ,Pyridines ,media_common.quotation_subject ,030106 microbiology ,Disease ,invasive fungal infection ,Aspergillosis ,mucormycosis ,Microbiology ,Drug Costs ,03 medical and health sciences ,Amphotericin B ,invasive mold disease ,Nitriles ,cost ,Humans ,Medicine ,liposomal amphotericin B ,Intensive care medicine ,health care economics and organizations ,media_common ,Voriconazole ,business.industry ,isavuconazole ,Mucormycosis ,healthcare ,Health Care Costs ,Triazoles ,medicine.disease ,United Kingdom ,posaconazole ,Models, Economic ,Treatment Outcome ,Costs and Cost Analysis ,Liposomal amphotericin ,business ,Research Article ,medicine.drug ,Healthcare system - Abstract
Aim: Invasive mold diseases (IMDs) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Approved treatments include voriconazole (VORI), liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB), posaconazole (POSA) and isavuconazole (ISAV). A UK-based economic model was developed to explore the cost of treating IMDs with ISAV versus L-AMB followed by POSA. Materials & methods: As indirect comparisons have demonstrated similar efficacy between the comparators, a cost-minimization approach was taken. Drug acquisition, administration & monitoring, and hospitalization costs were evaluated from the healthcare system perspective. Results: Per-patient costs were UK£14,842 with ISAV versus UK£18,612 with L-AMB followed by POSA. Savings were driven by drug acquisition, and administration & monitoring costs. Conclusion: ISAV has the potential to reduce IMD treatment costs relative to L-AMB followed by POSA.
- Published
- 2018