Search

AIM: This observational cohort study aimed to identify factors associated with pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and asystole in in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) patients and to determine whether differences in outcome based on the initial rhythm were explained by patient- and cardiac arrest characteristics.METHODS: Adults with IHCA from 2017 to 2018 were included from the Danish IHCA Registry (DANARREST). Additional data came from population-based registries. Unadjusted (RRs) and adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) were estimated for predictors of initial rhythm, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and survival.RESULTS: We included 1495 PEA and 1285 asystole patients. The patients did not differ substantially in patient characteristics. Female sex, age >90 years, pulmonary disease, and obesity were associated with initial asystole. Ischemic heart disease and witnessed and monitored cardiac arrest were associated with initial PEA. In unadjusted and adjusted analyses, PEA was associated with increased ROSC (aRR = 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10; 1.33). PEA was also associated with increased 30-day and 1-year survival in the unadjusted analysis, while there was no clear association between the initial rhythm and 30-day (aRR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.71; 1.11) and 1-year (aRR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.69; 1.04) survival when patient- and cardiac arrest characteristics were adjusted for.CONCLUSION: In patients with IHCA presenting with PEA or asystole, there were no major differences in patient demographics and comorbidities. The patients differed substantially in cardiac arrest characteristics. Initial PEA was associated with higher risk of ROSC, but there was no difference in 30-day and 1-year survival.

Background Should all out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest ( OHCA ) patients be directly transported to cardiac arrest centers ( CAC s) remains under debate. Our study evaluated the impacts of different transport time and destination hospital on the outcomes of OHCA patients. Methods and Results Data were collected from 6655 OHCA patients recorded in the regional prospective OHCA registry database of Taoyuan City, Taiwan, between January 2012 and December 2016. Patients were matched on propensity score, which left 5156 patients, 2578 each in the CAC and non‐ CAC groups. Transport time was dichotomized into CAC s and good neurological outcome at discharge and survival to discharge were investigated. Of the 5156 patients, 4215 (81.7%) presented with nonshockable rhythms and 941 (18.3%) presented with shockable rhythms. Regardless of transport time, transportation to a CAC increased the likelihoods of survival to discharge (CI, 1.11–3.41; ≥8 minutes: aOR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.25–2.94) and good neurological outcome at discharge (CI, 1.40–5.22; ≥8 minutes: aOR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.29–3.75) in OHCA patients with shockable rhythms but not in patients with nonshockable rhythms. Conclusions OHCA patients with shockable rhythms transported to CAC s demonstrated higher probabilities of survival to discharge and a good neurological outcome at discharge. Direct ambulance delivery to CAC s should thus be considered, particularly when OHCA patients present with shockable rhythms.

Background For many years, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) has been considered as a favorable factor to improve survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs). To examine the effect of BCPR on the survival of OHCAs and whether BCPR might also improve survival when the initial rhythm of OHCAs is limited, we performed a meta-analysis on published observational studies. Methods We did a systematic review to identify all studies published up to March, 2018, in any language, that reported the relation between BCPR and the survival of OHCAs. Using standard forms, two authors independently identified studies for inclusion and extracted information. The outcome was survival. Meta-regression was done to ascertain weighted factors for the outcomes. Results Data were extracted from 19 studies involving 232,703 patients. Firstly, pooled odds ratio (OR) from 16 cohort studies showed that BCPR was associated with improved chance of survival of OHCAs compared with NO-BCPR (OR 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.66–2.30). Secondly, from 8 cohort studies of OHCAs whose initial rhythm is limited, the pooled OR was 2.10 (95% CI, 1.68–2.63) of 6 articles for shockable rhythm and 1.07 (95% CI, 0.37–3.13) of 2 articles for non-shockable rhythm. Meta-regression showed a relation between the survival of OHCAs and BCPR was influenced by area (p

AIM: To identify factors associated with the initial rhythm in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest and to assess whether potential differences in outcomes based on the initial rhythm can be explained by patient and event characteristics.METHODS: Adult patients (≥18 years old) with in-hospital cardiac arrest in 2017 and 2018 were included from the Danish In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry (DANARREST). We used population-based registries to obtain data on comorbidities, cardiac procedures, and medications. Unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (RRs) for initial rhythm, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and survival were estimated in separate models including an incremental number of prespecified variables.RESULTS: A total of 3,422 patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest were included, of which 639 (19%) had an initial shockable rhythm. Monitored cardiac arrest, witnessed cardiac arrest, and specific cardiac diseases (i.e. ischemic heart disease, dysrhythmias, and valvular heart disease) were associated with initial shockable rhythm. Conversely, higher age, female sex, and specific non-cardiovascular comorbidities (e.g. overweight and obesity, renal disease, and pulmonary cancer) were associated with an initial non-shockable rhythm. Initial shockable rhythm remained strongly associated with increased ROSC (RR = 1.63, 95%CI 1.51-1.76), 30-day survival (RR = 2.31, 95%CI 2.02-2.64), and 1-year survival (RR = 2.36, 95%CI 2.02-2.76) compared to initial non-shockable rhythm in the adjusted analyses.CONCLUSION: In this study, specific patient and cardiac arrest characteristics were associated with initial rhythm in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest. However, differences in patient and cardiac arrest characteristics did not fully explain the association with survival for initial shockable rhythm compared to a non-shockable rhythm.

Introduction: The previous studies about exercise-related sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) have mainly focused on sports activity, but information related to SCA in other forms of physical exercise is lacking. Our aim was to identify characteristics and prognosis of SCA victims in the general population who suffered SCA during physical activity.Methods and results: We collected retrospectively all cases of attempted resuscitation in Oulu University Hospital Area between 2007 and 2012. A total of 300 cases were of cardiac origin. We only included witnessed cases with Emergency Medical System arrival time ≤15 min. Cases of low-intensity physical activity were excluded. A total of 47 SCAs occurred during moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (exercise-group) and 43 cases took place at rest (rest–group). The subjects in exercise-group were younger compared to the rest-group (60 ± 14 years vs. 67 ± 14 years, p = 0.016). The initial rhythm recorded was more often ventricular fibrillation (VF) in exercise-group compared to the rest-group (77 vs. 50%, p = 0.010). Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) was rare in exercise-group compared to the rest -group (2.1 vs. 14%, p = 0.033, respectively). Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was more often performed when SCA took place during physical exercise (47 vs. 23 %, p = 0.020). Survival rates to hospital discharge were higher in the exercise-group compared to the rest -group (49 vs. 9.3%, p < 0.0001).Conclusions: SCA occurring during physical activity is more frequently a result of VF and bystander CPR is more often performed. There is also a notably better survival rate to hospital discharge.