1. Estimation of myocardial strain from non-rigid registration and highly accelerated cine CMR
- Author
-
Michaela Schmidt, Andreas Greiser, Alistair A. Young, Christopher J. Occleshaw, Ruvin Gabriel, Hoi Ieng Lam, Boris S. Lowe, Suzanne Lydiard, Jonathan E. N. Langton, and Brett R. Cowan
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Time Factors ,Heart Diseases ,Mean squared error ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine ,Iterative reconstruction ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Ventricular Function, Left ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Consistency (statistics) ,Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ,Linear regression ,Humans ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Cardiac imaging ,Aged ,Observer Variation ,Strain (chemistry) ,business.industry ,Reproducibility of Results ,Middle Aged ,Myocardial Contraction ,Biomechanical Phenomena ,Case-Control Studies ,Myocardial strain ,Feasibility Studies ,Female ,Stress, Mechanical ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Nuclear medicine ,Radial stress - Abstract
Sparsely sampled cardiac cine accelerated acquisitions show promise for faster evaluation of left-ventricular function. Myocardial strain estimation using image feature tracking methods is also becoming widespread. However, it is not known whether highly accelerated acquisitions also provide reliable feature tracking strain estimates. Twenty patients and twenty healthy volunteers were imaged with conventional 14-beat/slice cine acquisition (STD), 4× accelerated 4-beat/slice acquisition with iterative reconstruction (R4), and a 9.2× accelerated 2-beat/slice real-time acquisition with sparse sampling and iterative reconstruction (R9.2). Radial and circumferential strains were calculated using non-rigid registration in the mid-ventricle short-axis slice and inter-observer errors were evaluated. Consistency was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and bias with Bland–Altman analysis. Peak circumferential strain magnitude was highly consistent between STD and R4 and R9.2 (ICC = 0.876 and 0.884, respectively). Average bias was −1.7 ± 2.0 %, p
- Published
- 2016