Search

Hepatic lymphoma is poorly characterized in cats and differentiating between inflammation and lymphomas is often difficult. The diagnosis of hepatic lymphoma in humans relies on recognition of specific patterns of lymphocytic infiltrates and clonality testing of antigen receptors. Herein, we defined similar patterns of lymphocytic infiltrates in hepatic biopsies of cats and correlated them with clonality to determine which patterns are predictive of lymphoma. A retrospective study was performed on surgical biopsies from 44 cats. The immunophenotype was characterized using CD3 and CD20 on all 44 samples. All 44 samples were tested using PCR for T-cell receptor gamma-gene rearrangements. PCR for immunoglobulin heavy chain gene rearrangements was performed on 24 of these cats. Four patterns of lymphocytic infiltrates were characterized: (1) tightly periportal, (2) periportal and centrilobular, (3) nodular, and (4) periportal with sinusoidal extension. Other histomorphologic features (fibrosis, biliary hyperplasia, bile ductopenia, bile duct targeting, hepatic hematopoiesis, lipogranulomas, lymphonodular aggregates, other inflammatory cells) were also evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of the lymphocytic patterns to diagnose lymphomas were determined using Bayesian Hui–Walter analysis (BLCM) against clonality results. Lymphocytic patterns 2, 3, and 4 accurately diagnosed hepatic lymphomas with a sensitivity and specificity of 82% (CI 95%: 0.65, 0.96) and 77% (CI 95%: 0.54, 1.00), respectively. None of the other microscopic features evaluated were predictive of a lymphoma or inflammation. Our study identified specific patterns of lymphocytic infiltration that differentiate feline hepatic lymphoma from inflammation while other histologic features were not associated with an accurate diagnosis.

Background In dogs, hepatic lymphoma is characterized by neoplastic lymphocyte infiltration into the liver. Reports on the computed tomography (CT) findings of the liver for canine hepatic lymphoma are few, with only one study of multiple liver lesions type. Objectives The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the CT findings of the liver in canine diffuse hepatic lymphoma. Methods As control, five dogs without abnormalities in the liver were included. CT data were analysed, and the following were noted: presence of edge bluntness of the liver, presence of periportal collar sign, the liver size:body weight (BW) ratio and the mean attenuation of liver lesions on pre‐contrast, arterial‐phase, portal‐phase and equilibrium‐phase post‐contrast images. Results On CT examination, edge bluntness of the liver was significantly detected in lymphoma (4/5, 80%), as opposed to the control (0/5, 0%) (p = 0.048, φ = 0.82). The periportal collar sign was detected in lymphoma (3/5, 60%), as opposed to the control (0/5, 0%) (p = 0.17, φ = 0.65). The liver size:BW ratio of lymphoma cases was significantly higher compared to that of the control cases (p = 0.0002, r = 0.92). The mean Hounsfield unit of lymphoma cases in the pre‐contrast, arterial‐phase, portal‐phase and equilibrium‐phase images were significantly lower than in the control cases (p = 0.005, r = 0.81; p = 0.0003, r = 0.91; p = 0.01, r = 0.75 and p = 0.02, r = 0.71, respectively). Conclusions Hepatic lymphoma should be a differential for a blunted and enlarged liver with hypoattenuation on CT examination., Hepatic lymphoma should be a differential for a blunted and enlarged liver with hypoattenuation on CT examination.

Primary hepatic lymphoma is rare. Clinical and radiological presentations are not specific. The diagnosis is often late. Chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis, especially post-viral C usually precedes primary liver lymphoma. The differential diagnosis arises mainly with other hepatic tumors, such as atypical hypovascular cellular hepatocellular carcinoma when there is liver cirrhosis and with hypovascular hepatic metastases, especially colorectal, stomach and lung metastases. Other differential diagnosis are tuberculosis or sarcoidosis, particularly when there is multiple lesions. We report the case of a 52-year woman, with a history of hepatitis C infection, presenting liver cirrhosis with multiple hepatic lesions. Radiological aspect was not specific which makes it difficult to distinguish from other hepatic tumors, especially hypovascular liver metastases.

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the ability of texture parameters combining with machine learning methods in distinguishing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) and hepatic lymphoma (HL). Method: A total of 28 patients with HL and 101 patients with ICCA were included. A total of 45 texture features were extracted by the software LifeX from contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CECT) images and 38 of them were eligible. A total of 5 feature selection methods and 9 feature classification methods were used to build the best diagnostic models, combining with the 10-fold cross-validation to assess the accuracy of these models. The discriminative ability of each model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Result: A total of 45 predictive models were built by the cross combination of each selection and classification method to differentiate ICCA from HL. According to the results of test group, most of the models performed well with a large area under the curve (AUC) (>0.85) and high accuracy (>0.85). Random Forest (RF)_Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) (AUC = 0.997, accuracy = 0.969) was the best model among all the 45 models. Conclusion: Combining texture parameters from CECT with multiple machine learning models can differentiate ICCA and HL effectively, and RF_LDA performed the best in this process.

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a relatively rare presentation of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, often found only during postmortem examination in patients. We treated a 33-year-old woman with prominent jaundice who was diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma presenting as ALF. We could not perform liver biopsy during the critical phase because of coagulopathy, but gastric biopsy showed the infiltration of lymphoma cells. The patient was successfully treated with rituximab and chemotherapy and she survived. Malignant lymphoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients who show liver dysfunction, and biopsy should be performed.

Follicular lymphoma is the second most common type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Hepatic accumulation observed on FDG-PET/CT, which is the most useful imaging finding, is observed in 15% of cases. Secondary hepatic lymphoma is defined based on distant involvement, and it typically presents as diffuse infiltration, as in this case.

Background: Inflammatory Pseudo Tumor (IPT)-like Follicular Dendritic Cell (FDC) Sarcoma of the liver is a very rare disease and occurs mostly in the lymph nodes. Till now, only 19 cases were reported in the English literature. However, the coexistence of IPT-like Sarcoma and Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma(NHL) in the same patient has never been reported.Case presentation: We reported a case of a 47-year-old male patient who had a history of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and presented with right upper abdominal discomfort. Nineteen years ago, he underwent liver resection of segment VII for Hepatic Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-cell lymphoma). Serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level was normal. However, Imaging studies revealed a well-circumscribed, solid mass in the right hepatic lobe and was diagnosed as (Hepatocellular Carcinoma) HCC or Hepatic Lymphoma preoperatively. Right hemi-hepatectomy was performed on this patient. Histological report showed features of a mixture of chronic inflammatory cells and variable amounts of spindle cells. Also, Immuno-Histo-Chemical (IHC) studies demonstrated that all the tumor cells showed strong nuclear in situ labeling for EBV-encoded small RNAs (EBER) and strongly positive stainings with CD21 and CD35. The patient is still disease free after a follow-up of 40 months. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating Hepatic IPT-like FDC Sarcoma in a patient with Primary Hepatic Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma history. In regards to treatment, complete surgical resection should be performed and would acquire excellent long-term outcomes.

Purpose: Imaging manifestations of hepatic lymphoma, both primary (PHL) and secondary (SHL), are extremely variable and non-specific, but some features are useful diagnostic clues in an appropriate clinical setting. Through a PubMed search, we found several published reviews focused on PHL and SHL diagnosis. However, to the best of our knowledge, few of them encompass a comprehensive analysis of all the diagnostic tools and relative radiological findings. The aim of this review is to provide a description of the radiological features of both PHL and SHL, by critically analyzing the available literature. Materials and methods: An extensive review of published literature along with a description of personal case series of both PHL and SHL has been conducted. Results: SHL can be easily diagnosed with imaging techniques, as it is usually associated with node disease. On the contrary the diagnosis can be a challenge in PHL, often mimicking HCC or liver metastasis of adenocarcinoma. In this context, multiparametric MRI plays a fundamental role in the differential diagnosis. Both for PHL and SHL, liver involvement presents as solitary or multiple lesions or as diffuse infiltrative disease. Conclusion: PHL and SHL may be correctly characterized using different radiological techniques. Both CT and MRI have showed a good correlation with histology, as they permit to distinguish between lymphomatous tissue, and necrotic and fibrotic areas.

Primary hepatic lymphoma (PHL) is defined as a lympho-proliferative disorder limited to the liver without any involvement of the spleen, lymph nodes, bone marrow or blood. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common histological type counting more than 60-80% of all PHL. Usually, it occurs in middle-aged men with aspecific symptoms and diagnosis is confirmed by histopathology. In order to expand current knowledge and to investigate an optimal therapeutic strategy, a systematic review of literature was conducted in February 2016. A total of 274 articles were retrieved, and after exclusion, 55 were retained, reporting 147 cases of PHL. Patients were mainly men (64.9%) with a median age at diagnosis of 57 years (range: 17-92) and right hepatic lobe involvement (69.6%). Among the 147 patients, 9% received no therapy while 77% underwent treatment including chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy in 64%, 26% and 1% of cases, respectively. Mean follow-up was 22.6 months (range: 0.2-360). Overall mortality was 29.2% with a 90-day mortality of 26%. Risk factors for increased mortality include; bilobar lesions (p = 0.001), right lobe localisation (p = 0.003) and non-surgical approach or the absence of any treatment (p = 0.001). A trend towards favourable outcomes for young patients (mean = 50.4 years) with a large liver lesion was achieved by surgical management of PHL but this did not achieve statistical significance. Statistical analysis indicates that in cases of resectable disease, an aggressive surgical approach in selected patients leads to increase long-term survival. Thus, two hypotheses should be assessed in further randomized studies: 1°) resectable PHL is a less severe form or 2°) hepatectomy is an effective treatment for PHL.

Hepatic lymphoma can be divided into its primary and secondary forms. To be classified as primary hepatic lymphoma, the disease should be limited to the liver and hilar lymph nodes, with no distant involvement (to the bone marrow or other sites). Primary hepatic lymphoma is quite rare, accounting for less than 1% of all cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, whereas secondary hepatic lymphoma affects nearly half of such cases. Familiarity with the imaging features of hepatic lymphoma is important for its early diagnosis and appropriate management. In this essay, we aim to review the roles of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in identifying and monitoring hepatic lymphomas, using sample cases to describe and illustrate the wide spectrum of imaging findings in the primary and secondary forms of this disorder.O linfoma hepático pode ser dividido em primário e secundário. Para ser classificada como linfoma hepático primário, a doença deve estar limitada ao fígado e linfonodos hilares, sem acometimento de outros órgãos (incluindo a medula óssea). O linfoma hepático primário é muito raro, correspondendo a menos de 1% de todos os linfomas não Hodgkin. Já o envolvimento secundário do fígado ocorre em quase metade dos casos de linfoma não Hodgkin. O conhecimento dos aspectos de imagem do linfoma hepático é importante para o diagnóstico precoce e manejo adequado do paciente. Com base em imagens de casos, nosso objetivo é revisar o papel da imagem por tomografia computadorizada e ressonância magnética na identificação e segmento do linfoma hepático, ilustrando e descrevendo o amplo espectro de achados de imagem observados nas formas primária e secundária da doença.

Objectives: This study compared the diagnostic ability of image-based parameters with texture parameters in the differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and hepatic lymphoma (HL) by positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET/CT). Methods: Patients with pathological diagnosis of HCC and HL were included in this study. Image-based and texture parameters were obtained by manual drawing of region of interest. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to test the diagnostic capacity of each parameter. Binary logistic regression was used to transform the most discriminative image-based parameters, texture parameters, and the combination of these parameters into three regression models. ROC was used to test the diagnostic capacity of these models. Result: Ninety-nine patients diagnosed with HCC (n = 76) and HL (n = 23, 10 primary HL, 13 secondary HL) by histological examination were included in this study (From 2011 to 2018, West China hospital). According to the AUC and p-value, 2 image-based parameters and five texture parameters were selected. The diagnostic ability of texture-based model was better than that of image-based model, and after combination of those two groups of parameters the diagnostic capacity improved. Conclusion: Texture parameters can differentiate HCC from HL quantitatively and improve the diagnostic ability of image-based parameters.

The aim of the present study was to delineate the radiographic and clinical features of primary hepatic lymphoma (PHL). Four histopathologically confirmed cases of PHL were analyzed with respect to the radiological, clinical and pathological characteristics. The main clinical manifestations included upper right quadrant pain and lymphoma-associated B symptoms, such as fever, night sweating and weight loss. All the patients had elevated serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase. Furthermore, all the patients underwent plain and enhanced computed tomography examinations, which identified low-density lesions without marked enhancement. Solitary masses were observed in two cases, while multiple focal lesions were noted in one case and diffuse multi-speckled nodules were observed in one case. Two patients underwent abdominal magnetic resonance imaging, which revealed lesions that were hyperintense on T1-weighted imaging (WI) scans and hypointense on T2WI scans, and exhibited slight to moderate enhancement with a dynamic contrast-enhanced protocol. In one case, vessels were visible within the lesion. Therefore, the present study concluded that PHL is a rare condition that exhibits non-specific clinical and radiological features. A combination of imaging results and clinical manifestations can be used to facilitate a diagnosis of PHL.

Systemic hematopoietic disorders may present on liver biopsy, and rare cases of primary hepatic lymphoma (PHL) may be encountered. Hepatopathologists must be familiar with the full spectrum of hematopoietic disorders involving the liver and be prepared to exclude benign mimics. PHL, which is confined to the liver without extrahepatic involvement, can present as solitary or multiple nodules, raising consideration for carcinoma on imaging, or may mimic benign inflammatory conditions, posing a diagnostic challenge. This article describes clinical, morphologic, and immunophenotypic features of some of the most common hematopoietic neoplasms involving the liver, along with differential diagnosis and recommended ancillary testing.

Objectives: To explore the diagnosis of hematolymphoid malignancies of the liver (hepatic lymphoma [HeL]) by image-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA), which can often be difficult due to a low index of suspicion and nonspecific patient presentations, especially in the rare cases where the liver is the only site of disease (primary HeL [PHeL]). Understanding the clinical setting in which such lesions arise, as well as the cytomorphologic findings, may assist cytopathologists in making an accurate diagnosis and triaging samples for ancillary studies. Methods: In this retrospective study of 32 patients with HeL, the largest such study to our knowledge, we review the clinical and diagnostic features of HeL. Results: HeL and especially PHeL most commonly show a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma phenotype and have a poor prognosis (median survival of seven months). PHeL is strongly associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection (12/16 patients). Conclusions: Image-guided FNA with immediate evaluation is a reliable means to obtain diagnostic material and triage for ancillary tests.

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a common complication following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) that typically manifests as injury to the skin, gastrointestinal mucosa, and liver. In some cases, hepatic GVHD may be histologically indistinguishable from other disorders such as infection and drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Additionally, clinical signs and symptoms are frequently confounded by the superimposed effects of pretransplant chemoradiotherapy, immunotherapy (IT) (targeted to the underlying malignancy), GVHD prophylaxis, and infection. Thus, careful attention to and correlation with clinical findings, laboratory values, and histologic features is essential for diagnosis. This review, aimed at the practicing pathologist, will discuss current clinical and histologic criteria for GVHD, the approach to diagnosis of hepatic GVHD, and features helpful for distinguishing it from other entities in the differential diagnosis.

推定16歳の去勢雄の雑種猫が食欲および活動性の低下を主訴として来院した。初診時において，本症例では重度の削痩が認められた。脱水の評価を目的として胸背部の皮膚をつまみあげたところ，皮膚が容易に剥離した。剥離した皮膚片の病理組織検査より，表皮の菲薄化，真皮における膠原線維の高度減少，皮膚付属器における高度の萎縮などが認められたことから，猫の後天性皮膚脆弱症候群と診断した。潜在する基礎疾患を同定するため各種検査を実施したところ，Ｘ線検査および超音波検査により胸水の貯留と肝臓における正常構造の消失が認められた。対症療法を実施したが初診日より第16日目に死亡した。死後の剖検ならびに病理組織学的診断により，本症例では肝臓にリンパ腫が認められた。

症例は71歳の男性で, 2003年5月検診目的の腹部超音波検査にて肝内に0.8cmの腫瘍を指摘された. 肝生検で, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (以下, MALT) リンパ腫と診断. 患者の希望で, 無治療で経過していた. 2006年2月腫瘍の増大あり, 当院紹介. 血液検査では, 貧血, 肝機能障害などの異常を認めなかった. 腹部超音波検査では, 肝S6に74×45mmの低エコー領域, 腹部CT所見では, 肝S6に造影効果のない, 低吸収域の占居性病変を認めた. 遠隔転移を認めず, 肝臓に限局した肝原発MALT リンパ腫と診断し, 2006年3月肝S6部分切除術を施行した. 切除標本の肉眼検査所見は境界明瞭な充実性腫瘍で, 病理組織学的診断でMALTリンパ腫と診断された. 肝原発MALTリンパ腫はまれな疾患であり, これまで2年10か月にわたり無治療で経過した報告はない. このまれな1切除例を若干の文献的考察を加え報告する.

The imaging manifestations of hepatic lymphoma, both in its primary and secondary form, are extremely variable and overlap with a number of other more common hepatic diseases. However, in the appropriate clinical context, combining the imaging and laboratory features can aid in making the correct diagnosis. Since the management and prognosis of lymphomas are significantly different from other malignancies, early diagnosis and prompt commencement of therapy is of paramount importance. The various morphological appearances of hepatic lymphoma on imaging have been described here along with their possible differentials. Teaching points • Primary hepatic lymphoma is extremely rare. • Secondary liver involvement occurs in 50 % of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. • The imaging manifestations of hepatic lymphoma are largely non-specific. • Some imaging features may be helpful in the appropriate clinical setting. • Management and prognosis of lymphoma is significantly different from other malignancies.

The imaging of hepatic lymphoma can be challenging because several morphologic patterns can be seen. The infiltrative, nodular, and combined forms are well recognized. We describe a rare periportal hepatic lymphoma that was diagnosed on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

The authors report two cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in non immunodeficient subjects characterized by periportal low attenuation at CT. Both patients showed gallbladder wall thickening. The different causes of periportal abnormalities are presented and discussed.

We report here a case of an older woman, 90 years old on admission, who presented with general deterioration, fever, abdominal pain, large hepatic mass, and was found to have an extra-nodal large B-cell lymphoma of the liver. The patient was successfully treated with multi-agent chemotherapy and followed up for 2 years with no recurrence of the disease. To the best of our knowledge this is the oldest patient reported with such a primary extra-nodal hepatic lymphoma and a remarkably favourable response to chemotherapy.

Hepatic lymphoma is a rare disease with poor prognosis because of delayed diagnosis. The disease comprises primary, metastatic, and intravascular hepatic lymphomas. The pathological characteristics of lymphomas differ contributing to difficulty in early diagnosis. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment result in improved prognosis; therefore, diagnostic radiology and its development with various contrast agents are critical for improving disease outcomes. Herein, we review hepatic lymphomas and summarize the results of imaging studies in correlation with pathological characteristics. The information provided will help physicians in early diagnosis and thereby improving prognosis.

This study demonstrates the appearance of focal hepatic lymphoma using current magnetic resonance techniques including gadolinium enhancement. Fifteen patients with hepatic lymphoma were imaged at 1.5T. T1-weighted, T2-weighted, immediate, and 5–10-min delayed T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo images were acquired in all patients. Determination was made of lesion size, number, morphology, and signal intensity of lesions on all sequences. Seven patients had solitary lesions and 8 patients had multiple lesions. Focal lesions of hepatic lymphoma ranged in size from 5 mm to 15 cm. They were well defined masses with mild to moderate low signal intensity relative to liver on T1-weighted images. Lymphoma lesions in 6 patients were moderately high in signal intensity on T2-weighted images compared with liver (Type I lesions), and enhancement of lesions was intense on early post-gadolinium images in 5 of these patients. Lymphoma lesions in 6 patients were mildly hypointense to mildly hyperintense on T2-weighted images compared to liver (Type II lesions), and lesions in 5 of these patients enhanced minimally on the early post-gadolinium spoiled gradient echo images. The remaining 3 patients had received chemotherapy before the magnetic resonance examination, and the imaging findings varied reflecting presumed differences in treatment responses. Transient ill defined perilesional enhancement on immediate post-gadolinium spoiled gradient echo images was observed in 9 patients including patients with either type of lesion. Focal lesions of hepatic lymphoma are usually low in signal intensity on T1-weighted images but have variable signal intensity on T2-weighted images. In general, lesions that are mildly hypointense to minimally hyperintense in signal intensity on T2-weighted images enhance minimally, and lesions moderately high in signal intensity on T2-weighted images enhance intensely. Transient increased perilesional enhancement is common.

Purpose: Description of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) patterns of hepatic lymphoma. Materials and Methods: Over a period of 6 years and 1 month from January 2006 to January 2012, n = 38 patients with histological or clinically apparent hepatic lymphoma were studied by means of CEUS prior to B-mode imaging. Results: Using B-mode imaging, lesions were hypoechoic in n = 37 (97.4 %) cases, while a focal lymphoma lesion was echo-rich in 1 case (2.6 %). For comparison, with CEUS, a hyperenhanced signal during the arterial phase was observed in n = 9 (23.7 %), an isoenhanced signal in n = 17 (44.7 %) and a hypoenhanced signal in n = 12 (31.6 %) cases. During the portal phase n = 2 (5.3 %) lesions were isoenhanced and n = 36 (94.7 %) were hypoenhanced followed by a hypoenhancement in n = 38 (100 %) cases in the late phase. Conclusion: Lymphomas of the liver can cause different contrast accumulation in the arterial phase of CEUS. Furthermore, a clear differentiation from other malignant liver lesions such as metastases is crucial as different contrast accumulation in the arterial phase of CEUS is observed. In the late phase, hepatic lymphomas lead to a hypoenhancement in CEUS, also known as a “wash-out” phenomenon. In conclusion, CEUS is helpful to differentiate hepatic lesions by means of evaluating the malignancy or benignancy. In this regard, the application of CEUS can help to find the right diagnosis. A final discrimination between malignant liver lesions, such as liver lymphomas, metastasis or HCC, remains impossible.

Tc-99m red blood cell (RBC) scintigraphy is a very specific method for the diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma and false-positive cases have been rarely reported. The authors present an interesting case in which markedly increased blood pool was seen on Tc-99m RBC scintigraphy in a patient with an hepatic mass. However, the "positive" RBC scan did not explain the entire abnormality seen on the colloid liver scan. Therefore, an additional mass was suspected and further investigation revealed hepatic lymphoma.

Areas of hypoattenuation in the liver which do not have mass effect are typically thought to represent focal fatty infiltration. Rarely, tumors can present without mass effect in the liver. We present a case in which areas of liver hypoattenuation which were initially thought to represent focal fatty infiltration on CT due to lack of mass effect had abnormal uptake on a FDG PET/CT exam; these areas were due to secondary hepatic involvement from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Lymphomatous involvement of the liver may present as acute liver failure but is an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation. Therefore it is imperative to diagnose such patients since survival in this group is poor and recurrence is high. We describe two patients with acute liver failure referred for liver transplantation whose diagnostic testing revealed hepatic lymphoma. These cases underscore the importance of considering lymphoma in the differential diagnosis of acute liver failure prior to liver transplant.

The sonographic studies of 72 patients with pathologically proven Hodgkin's or non-Hodgkin's hepatic lymphoma were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-eight patients (94%) had secondary hepatic lymphoma (nine of them had AIDS-related lymphoma) and four patients (6%) had primary lymphoma of the liver. Forty-six of 72 patients (64%) had diffuse hepatic involvement, and 26 of 72 patients (36%) had focal liver lesions as demonstrated by sonography. Four patterns of disease were identified: (a) hepatomegaly was depicted by sonography in 26 of the 59 patients with secondary hepatic lymphoma not related to AIDS, in two of the nine patients with AIDS-related secondary hepatic lymphoma, and in one of the four patients with primary hepatic lymphoma; (b) multiple rounded well-delineated hypoechoic liver lesions were found in 22 of the 68 patients with secondary hepatic lymphoma; (c) a large heterogeneous echoic mass, which was an evocating clue to the diagnosis of primary lymphoma of the liver, was found in the four patients with primary lymphoma of the liver; and (d) an absence of sonographic abnormalities was found in 20 of the 59 patients with secondary lymphoma not related to AIDS. Liver involvement with lymphoma should be considered in any patient who develops multiple homogeneous hypoechoic liver masses, even in the absence of known underlying lymphomatous disease.

Objective Ultrasonography is the first examination performed for screening of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) can help discriminate between HCC and other lesions. Primary hepatic lymphoma (PHL), even if rare, should be considered in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLLs). Few data are available in the literature about the role of CEUS in the diagnosis of PHL; we tried to determine whether CEUS could have a role in this setting. Methods we describe 2 cases of primary non-Hodgkin lymphoma of the liver associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The first patient was a 62-year-old man who was an HBV-inactive carrier, and the second was a 58-year-old man with type 2 diabetes and chronic HBV hepatitis. Results in both cases, ultrasonography showed a hypoechoic liver lesion (4 and 3 cm, respectively) with irregular margins in segment 4 of the liver. On CEUS, these lesions were inhomogeneously hyperenhanced in the arterial phase and hypoenhanced in the portal and late phases. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in both patients showed slight hyperenhancement in the arterial phase and hypoenhancement in the remaining phases. Needle biopsy showed marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue type in both patients. Conclusions Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and CT did not help us differentiate PHL from HCC; in fact, in both cases we saw the characteristic findings of primary HCC. Primary hepatic lymphoma is a rare condition, but it should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of FLLs. We stress the important role of liver biopsy when imaging indicates HCC in patients without underlying cirrhosis.

Hepatic infiltration by lymphoma can be difficult to detect by conventional methods. We have studied 22 patients in vivo 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the liver and compared the results with the clinical staging and assessment of liver involvement by computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US), and liver function tests (LFTs). We find that the phosphomonoester (PME) to ATP, and the PME to Pi ratios are the best indication of liver involvement as in all the patients with liver involvement apparent on CT or US, these ratios were elevated (greater than 2 s.d. above the control mean). Of the patients with deranged LFTs but normal CT or US, five out of nine showed increased PME/ATP and PME/Pi ratios, and in the patients with normal LFTs and normal CT or US, three out of eight patients had raised PME ratios. Extracts of lymphomatous lymph nodes contain high concentrations of phosphoethanolamine which suggests that this compound is responsible for the increase in the PME peak. Eleven patients were studied again after chemotherapy, and those with initially raised PME/ATP and PME/Pi ratios all showed a decrease in these ratios towards normal. The patients with initially normal ratios showed no changes.

The liver is an extranodal organ that is frequently invaded by lymphomas, with most cases involving secondary lymphomas (1). The image findings of hepatic lymphoma have been reported as variable, ranging from single or multiple nodules to diffuse infiltrates (1, 2). It is known that hepatic lymphomas show low signal intensity on T1 weighted images, high signal intensity on T2 weighted images, and low signal intensity on hepatobiliary phase image, using hepatocyte-specific contrast agents (3, 4). Here, we report an atypical case of hepatic lymphoma showing iso-signal intensity on hepatobiliary phase of contrast-enhanced MRI using gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA, Primovist; Bayer Schering Pharma, Berlin, Germany).

Imaging findings of secondary hepatic lymphoma have been reported as variable, ranging from single or multiple small nodules to diffuse infiltrative tumor patterns. We hear present a rare case report concerning aggressive B cells, secondary Burkitt's lymphoma in non-AIDS demonstrating a surprising periportal lymphoma infiltration, without upper abdominal lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly on the sonography and CT scans. Clinically, the case was characterized by atypical and highly aggressive course, with the patient presenting an abruptly developed obstructive jaundice with rapidly deteriorating hepatic function that could be indicative of cholestatic hepatitis, which differs in its clinical manifestations from hepatic lymphoma without functional deterioration in respect of its non-tissue destructive growth pattern. We suggest that hepatic lymphoma can sometimes be consistent with periportal infiltrating homogeneous mass, with no lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly on the imaging examination, with a predictable aggressive clinical course of the disease and poor prognosis.

Hepatic involvement of lymphoma can be either primary or secondary. Primary hepatic lymphoma is a rare tumor and tends to produce focal liver lesions, whereas secondary lymphomatous infiltration is a diffuse disease which occasionally presents with a focal mass. Although some reports regarding ultrasonic and computed tomography (CT) features exist in the literature [l-4] very few focal hepatic lymphomas have been investigated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [5-71, and no reports were found concerning lymphoma examined by contrast enhanced dynamic FLASH (fast low angle shot) pulse sequences MRI. Radiological features of a rare manifestation of secondary hepatic lymphoma are presented, with emphasis on Gd-DOTA (gadolinium-diethylenetriamine tetra acetate) enhanced dynamic FLASH MRI.

The livers of 13 patients with histologically proven hepatic lymphomatous involvement were studied with both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). MRI and CT demonstrated a focal abnormality in only one case. In the other 12 cases in which a focal abnormality was not demonstrated with MRI or CT, calculated T1 and T2 relaxation times in regions of interest in the liver were within 1 SD of their respective normal means. The inability to detect hepatic involvement in most cases was probably due to the diffuse microscopic distribution of lymphoma in the liver and the methodology used for calculating relaxation factors. Thus, with current imaging technology, MRI does not seem to be better than CT for evaluating the liver for lymphomatous involvement.

The purpose of this investigation was to define the potential of unenhanced and ferrite-enhanced MR to detect hepatic lymphoma. Rats were implanted with diffuse and focal hepatic lymphoma. Both in vitro measurements of relaxation times and in vivo MR imaging of normal liver and of diffuse and focal hepatic lymphoma were compared. Diffuse infiltrative hepatic lymphoma showed increased T1 (45%) and T2 (41%) relaxation times in vitro, but could not be distinguished from normal control livers on in vivo spin echo (SE) images with a repetition time of 500 msec and an echo time of 30 msec (SE 500/30) or SE 1500/60 images. Focal hepatic lymphoma showed increased T1 (185%) and T2 (115%) relaxation times relative to normal liver tissue. Focal hepatic lymphoma was undetectable on unenhanced SE 500/30 MR images (contrast-to-noise ratio, C/N = 0.4) and was slightly hyperintense on SE 1500/60 images (C/N = 1.1). Ferrite (50 mumol Fe/kg) was administered to improve tissue contrast. In normal control animals, T2 of liver in vitro decreased from 29.3 +/- 3.3 msec to 11.1 +/- 1.2 msec, and image signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of liver in vivo decreased from 16.1 +/- 2.4 to 2.8 +/- 0.3 (p less than .005). Ferrite-enhanced diffuse hepatic lymphoma showed in vitro T2 values and in vivo MR image S/N values indistinguishable from those of normal control animals. The T2 of focal hepatic lymphoma was essentially unaltered by ferrite. On SE 500/30 images, focal hepatic lymphoma became readily detectable, quantitated by a 35-fold increase in tumor-liver C/N. We conclude that clinical studies are warranted to determine the value of ferrite enhanced MR as a technique for the enhanced detection of focal hepatic lymphoma.

Computed tomographic (CT) examinations of the abdomen, performed in 323 patients with lymphoma, were reviewed to determine the value of CT in detecting lymphomatous involvement of the liver and the CT appearance of hepatic lymphoma. Additionally, the CT scans were compared with the radionuclide scans. Of 95 patients in whom histological studies were performed, 65 had undergone both CT and radionuclide scanning. CT was found to have a sensitivity of 57% and a specificity of 88%. Radionuclide scans had a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 81%. No specific pattern of involvement was revealed by CT. No correlation was found between the type of lymphoma and evidence of liver involvement on CT or radionuclide scans. The results of studies of the spleen are also briefly reviewed. False-positive results of CT examinations were usually the result of technical artifacts. CT and radionuclide scans are comparable in their ability to detect hepatic involvement by lymphoma; however, because CT also provides information on abdominal lymph nodes, it is the preferable examination.

Thirteen patients with biopsy proven hepatic lymphoma (2 Hodgkin, 11 Non-Hodgkin) and a control group of 15 patients with hepatic metastases were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively by MRI. Focal hepatic lymphoma was most reliably detected (eight of eight patients) and appeared hypointense relative to liver on T1 weighted (CNR - 7.4 +/- 2.3) and hyperintense on T2 weighted (CNR + 8.4 +/- 2.9) images. The mean T1 and T2 relaxation times of focal hepatic lymphoma (T1 = 832 +/- 234 msec, T2 = 84 +/- 16 ms) differed significantly from adjacent non-tumorous liver (T1 = 420 +/- 121 ms, T2 = 51 +/- 9 ms; p less than 0.05), however CNR values and relaxation times were similar to those of hepatic metastases. Diffuse hepatic lymphoma (microscopic periportal infiltration) was undetectable by MRI in three patients by either morphologic features or quantitative criteria. A mixed pattern of hepatic lymphoma (focal lesions and diffuse infiltration) showed focal areas of slightly decreased signal intensity on T1 weighted images (CNR = -1.7 +/- 0.4) while T2 weighted images revealed multiple regions of focal hyperintensity (CNR = +13.3 +/- 8.4) superimposed on a diffusely hyperintense liver. Our experience demonstrates that either T1 or T2 weighted techniques are useful in detecting focal and that T2 weighted techniques are useful in detecting mixed hepatic lymphoma. Conventional image derived relaxation time measurements and quantitative parameters were of no additional diagnostic value.