Search

Background: The objective of this study was to explore women’s experiences of a screen-and-treat approach with ablative therapy (referred to by the Spanish acronym TVT-TA) as a method of treatment following a positive HPV test in Iquitos, Peru. Methods: A total of 111 in-depth interviews were conducted with 47 HPV positive women who attended the TVT-TA procedure at a primary-level healthcare facility. Interviews were conducted immediately before, immediately after, and six-weeks after TVT-TA. Results: Most interviewed women reported experiencing moderate pain during ablative therapy and minimal pain immediately after and six weeks after ablative therapy. Women also stated that the pain was less intense than they had expected. The most common physical aftereffects of treatment were bleeding and vaginal odor. Women experienced oscillating emotions with fear upon receiving a positive HPV result, calming after hearing about ablative therapy treatment, worry about pain from the treatment itself, relaxation with counseling about the procedure, and relief following treatment. Conclusions: Nearly all participants emphasized that any pain experienced during TVT-TA was worth it, recommended that TVT-TA be expanded and available to more women, and stated that TVT-TA was faster and easier than expected. This study found that TVT-TA is a feasible and acceptable means of treating HPV according to the women receiving the treatment.

Background The objective of this study was to explore women’s experiences of a screen-and-treat approach with ablative therapy (referred to by the Spanish acronym TVT-TA) as a method of treatment following a positive HPV test in Iquitos, Peru. Methods A total of 111 in-depth interviews were conducted with 47 HPV positive women who attended the TVT-TA procedure at a primary-level healthcare facility. Interviews were conducted immediately before, immediately after, and six-weeks after TVT-TA. Results Most interviewed women reported experiencing moderate pain during ablative therapy and minimal pain immediately after and six weeks after ablative therapy. Women also stated that the pain was less intense than they had expected. The most common physical after-effects of treatment were bleeding and vaginal odor. Women experienced oscillating emotions with fear upon receiving a positive HPV result, calming after hearing about ablative therapy treatment, worry about pain from the treatment itself, relaxation with counseling about the procedure, and relief following treatment. Conclusions Nearly all participants emphasized that they were pleased with the TVT-TA process even if they had experienced pain during TVT-TA, recommended that TVT-TA be expanded and available to more women, and stated that TVT-TA was faster and easier than expected. This study found that TVT-TA is a feasible and acceptable means of treating HPV according to the women receiving the treatment.

Background Injuries are a leading cause of death and disability globally. Over 90% of injury-related mortality happens in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs). Rwanda's pre-hospital emergency system – Service d'Aide Medicale Urgente (SAMU) – and their partners created an electronic pre-hospital registry and Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) project in 2014. The CQI showed progress in quality of care, sparking interest in factors enabling the project's success. Healthcare workers (HCW) are critical pieces of this success, yet we found a void of information linking pre-hospital HCW motivation to CQI programs like SAMU's. Methods Our mixed methods approach included a 40-question survey using questions regarding HCW motivation. We scored the surveys to compare SAMU staff motivation with other HCWs in LMICs, and used a Likert scale to elicit agreement or disagreement. A semi-structured interview based on employee motivation theory qualitatively explored SAMU staff motivation using constructivist grounded theory. To find interview themes, two researchers independently performed line-by-line analysis. Results SAMU staff received 5–21% higher motivation scores relative to other cohorts of HCWs in LMICs. Questions showing disagreement (five) asked about reprimand, damaged social standing, and ease of using the CQI technology. Three questions did not show consensus. Questions showing agreement (23) and strong agreement (nine) asked about organizational commitment, impact, and research improving patient care. Major themes were: improvements in quality of care, changes in job expectations, views on research, and positive experiences with data feedback. Conclusions The CQI project provides constant feedback vital to building and sustaining successful health systems. It encourages communication, collaboration, and personal investment, which increase organizational commitment. Continuous feedback provides opportunities for personal and professional development by uncovering gaps in knowledge, patient care, and technological understanding. Complete, personalized data input encouraged by the CQI improves resource allocation, building robust health systems that improve HCW agency and motivation.