Search

Background: There is an increasing demand for home mechanical ventilation (HMV) in patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency. At present, noninvasive ventilation is exclusively initiated in a clinical setting at all four centers for HMV in the Netherlands. In addition to its high societal costs and patient discomfort, commencing HMV is often delayed because of a lack of hospital bed capacity. Research Question: Is HMV initiation at home, using a telemonitoring approach, noninferior to in-hospital initiation in a nationwide study? Study Design and Methods: We conducted a nationwide, randomized controlled noninferiority trial, in which every HMV center recruited 24 patients (home [n = 12] vs hospital [n = 12]) with a neuromuscular disease or thoracic cage disorder, all with an indication to start HMV. Change in arterial CO 2 (PaCO 2) over a 6-month period was considered the primary outcome, and quality of life and costs were assessed as secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 96 patients were randomized, most of them diagnosed with neuromuscular disease. We found a significant improvement in PaCO 2 within both groups (home: from 6.1 to 5.6 kPa [P

Currently, more than 3000 patients in the Netherlands receive long-term ventilatory support. In the majority of patients, long-term ventilatory support leads to increased survival without any complications. Diaphragm pacing with an external pacemaker (diaphragm pacing system, DPS) seems an attractive alternative for long-term ventilatory support by mask or tracheostomy. Scientific research has since shown that DPS is effective in patients with high cervical paraplegia. In addition, patients with congenital central hypoventilation syndrome are also eligible for DPS. Patients with diaphragm paralysis are a new group of patients who may be eligible for DPS. Two European studies have shown that DPS should not be used in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In our experience, patients are no longer completely dependent on a ventilator or may even be able to discontinue using one if the procedure was successful. In the Netherlands, as far as we know, the technique is only used at the University Medical Center Groningen.

Currently, more than 2200 patients in the Netherlands receive chronic ventilatory support. In the majority of patients this leads to increased survival without any complications. Nevertheless, in case of ventilatory support via a mask, problems such as skin irritation, leakage and claustrophobia can occur. In case of tracheostomy, it can lead to increased pulmonary secretion. Diaphragm pacing with an external pacemaker might be an attractive alternative to prevent these symptoms as it can replace ventilatory support by mask or tracheostomy. Current indications are patients with spinal cord injury or with congenital central hypoventilation syndrome who are chronically respiratory insufficient. In our experience, patients can be completely or partially weaned from mechanical ventilation when using the diaphragm pacer. In the Netherlands, the technique is only performed at the University Medical Center Groningen.