Search

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs aflibercept and ranibizumab are used in neovascular retinal diseases but may be associated with non-ocular haemorrhage. Our objective was to compare the risk of non-ocular haemorrhage with intravitreal aflibercept versus intravitreal ranibizumab and with individual intravitreal anti-VEGFs versus intravitreal dexamethasone. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using four Italian claims databases, covering 18 million inhabitants from 2011 to 2016. Incident aflibercept users were matched 1:4 to incident ranibizumab users. The outcome was incident non-ocular haemorrhage requiring hospitalisation. Incidence per 1000 person-years (PYs) was estimated. Patients were followed for 180 days using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach. An as-treated (AT) approach was also employed, using grace periods of 60 or 90 days. Analyses were repeated for aflibercept versus dexamethasone and ranibizumab versus dexamethasone. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. We identified incident users of intravitreal ranibizumab (n = 21,766), aflibercept (n = 3150) and dexamethasone (n = 3900). The incidence of haemorrhage was four events per 1000 PYs for each drug. Aflibercept was not associated with increased risk versus ranibizumab at 180 days (HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.37–2.56]). Results were consistent in the AT analysis (HR 1.19 [95% CI 0.52–2.75]). No increased risk was found for aflibercept and ranibizumab at 180 days versus dexamethasone (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.30–2.60] and HR 0.67 [95% CI 0.33–1.38], respectively). No association was identified between intravitreal aflibercept and non-ocular haemorrhage versus ranibizumab. A comparable risk for these intravitreal anti-VEGFs and intravitreal dexamethasone was observed.

Background: The European post-authorisation study (EU PAS) register is a repository launched in 2010 by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). All EMA-requested PAS, commonly observational studies, must be recorded in this register. Multi-database studies (MDS) leveraging secondary data have become an important strategy to conduct PAS in recent years, as reflected by the type of studies registered in the EU PAS register. Objectives: To analyse and describe PAS in the EU PAS register, with focus on MDS. Methods: Studies in the EU PAS register from inception to 31st December 2018 were described concerning transparency, regulatory obligations, scope, study type (e.g., observational study, clinical trial, survey, systematic review/meta-analysis), study design, type of data collection and target population. MDS were defined as studies conducted through secondary use of >1 data source not linked at patient-level. Data extraction was carried out independently by 14 centres with expertise in pharmacoepidemiology, using publicly available information in the EU PAS register including study protocol, whenever available, using a standardised data collection form. For validation purposes, a second revision of key fields for a 15% random sample of studies was carried out by a different centre. The inter-rater reliability (IRR) was then calculated. Finally, to identify predictors of primary data collection-based studies/versus those based on secondary use of healthcare databases) or MDS (vs. non-MDS), odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated fitting univariate logistic regression models. Results: Overall, 1426 studies were identified. Clinical trials (N = 30; 2%), systematic reviews/meta-analyses (N = 16; 1%) and miscellaneous study designs (N = 46; 3%) were much less common than observational studies (N = 1227; 86%). The protocol was available for 63% (N = 360) of 572 observational studies requested by a competent authority. Overall, 36% (N = 446) of observational studies were based fully or partially on primary data collection. Of 757 observational studies based on secondary use of data alone, 282 (37%) were MDS. Drug utilisation was significantly more common as a study scope in MDS compared to non-MDS studies. The overall percentage agreement among collaborating centres that collected the data concerning study variables was highest for study type (93.5%) and lowest for type of secondary data (67.8%). Conclusions: Observational studies were the most common type of studies in the EU PAS register, but 30% used primary data, which is more resource-intensive. Almost half of observational studies using secondary data were MDS. Data recording in the EU PAS register may be improved further, including more widespread availability of study protocols to improve transparency.

This study aimed to evaluate the management of high cardiovascular risk (CVr) in the patients with diabetes by exploring the prescribing behavior in a setting of general practitioners (GPs). A retrospective cohort study was carried out using the data recorded between 2018 and 2020 in the clinical database of 10 GPs. Diabetes was defined using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) coding (250*) or using the laboratory parameters (hyperglycemia condition: ≥126 mg/dL). A cohort was described stratifying by demographic, clinical and therapeutic characteristics, and laboratory tests. Both the CVr and statin prescriptions were evaluated; adherence to statin therapy (medication possession ratio, MPR ≥ 80) was calculated in accordance with the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target. The multivariate logistic regression models with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were calculated to identify the predictors of lipid modifying agents use and achieved target therapy; moreover, glucose-lowering drugs use was evaluated. Out of 13,206 people screened, 1,851 (14.0%) patients were affected by diabetes mellitus (DM), and 1,373 were identified at high/very high CVr. Of them, 1,158 (84.3%) had at least one measurement of LDL-C, and 808 (58.8%) received a prescription with at least one lipid-lowering drug (LLD). The patients at high/very high CVr treated or not treated with LLD, reached the LDL-C target in 24.0 and 10.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). Furthermore, 34.6% of patients treated with high intensity LLDs and adherent to therapy showed the LDL-C values below the therapeutic target. Out of 1,373 patients at high/very high CVr, 958 (69.8%) had at least one prescription of glucose-lowering drugs. Of them, 52.0% (n = 498) were prescribed not in agreement with the current guidelines. More specifically, 392 patients (40.9%) were treated with metformin only, while the remaining 106 (11.1%) were treated with metformin together with hypoglycemic agents other than glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) or sodium-glucose-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. Our results suggest the urgent need to improve the management of patients with diabetes at high and very high CVr in the real life, to reduce the burden of diabetes on the health system.

Introduction It is generally acknowledged that the ocular safety profile of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs is acceptable, while the burden of systemic safety of these intravitreal agents is still being debated. The evaluation of the systemic safety of these drugs using real-world data (RWD), such as spontaneous reporting systems (SRS), electronic medical records (EMRs) and claims databases has several advantages, including the capture of outcomes among real-world populations over long observation periods. Nevertheless, there is a relatively small body of research exploring the post-marketing safety of these drugs. Areas covered The aim of this scoping review is to outline and discuss some of the methodological challenges to be faced when investigating the systemic safety of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs using different sources of RWD. Expert opinion Such challenges include the selection of the most suitable data source, taking into account how well drug utilization is captured and whether the outcomes and covariates of interest can be captured. The strengths and limitations of some analytic methods that can be used to quantify risk, such as the intention-to-treat approach and the as-treated approach, complement each other, and using these together provides a more balanced analysis.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of visual impairment and blindness in older adults. The prognosis for the neovascular type of advanced AMD improved with the introduction of biological drugs with antiangiogenic properties, beginning with off-label bevacizumab, which was first used intravitreally in 2006. These drugs target newly formed vessels that grow beneath the center of the retina, causing loss of central vision, and they can help to maintain or improve vision. Repeated intravitreal injections are needed to achieve prolonged inhibition of proangiogenic cytokines, primarily vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Major regulatory agencies have approved several molecules for AMD treatment, including ranibizumab, aflibercept, and brolucizumab. The development of further drugs was mainly targeted at prolonging anti-VEGF inhibition-thus reducing the frequency of injections-and expanding the biological targets of proangiogenic cytokine inhibition. Finally, biosimilars are already being marketed in some countries, allowing the containment of costs of AMD treatment, which are growing steadily in many settings because of the need for long-term treatment. This review summarizes the properties and clinical profiles of anti-VEGF biological drugs that are approved to treat neovascular AMD as well as ongoing research on molecules that may be marketed in the near future.

Introduction: Since vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) regulates several aspects of the central nervous system, particularly in dopaminergic neurons, VEGF inhibitors may be linked to Parkinson-like events and dementia, or variants of these diseases. Two recent case reports have found a potential link between intravitreal anti-VEGF use and Parkinson’s disease (PD) and dementia.\ud \ud Aim: To evaluate disproportionality in a large spontaneous reporting database concerning intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs and PD or dementia, and related conditions.\ud \ud Methods: Using VigiBase, individual case safety reports (ICSRs) attributed to intravitreal ranibizumab, aflibercept, pegaptanib, and bevacizumab were identified from 2010 to 2016. Within Standardised Narrow Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA®) Queries (SMQs) for “Parkinson-like events” and “Dementia,” suspected events were identified using preferred terms (PTs). The Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) was estimated with the lower 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all drug-event pairs with ≥3 suspected events. The vigiGrade completeness score was reported for the ICSRs. The analyses were repeated, including only persons aged 65 and over.\ud \ud Results: Out of 18.9 million ICSRs, 7,945 (0.004%) concerned intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs. Of these, 27 (0.34%) were identified concerning the SMQs “Dementia” (N = 17, 62.96%) and “Parkinson-like events” (N = 10, 37.94%) in persons of all ages. Among persons age 65 and over, 4,758 (59.88% of relevant ICSRs) ICSRs were identified for anti-VEGF drugs. When restricting disproportionality analysis to persons aged 65 and over, no disproportionality was seen for any of the drug-event pairs at the level of SMQ. However, on analysing disproportionality by PT, a potential signal emerged for intravitreal ranibizumab and Parkinson’s disease [N = 6 ICSRs; PRR: 3.05 (95% CI: 1.36-6.81)]. In general, the vigiGrade completeness score was low for all the ICSRs of interest, as no ICSR had a score >0.8.\ud \ud Conclusion: Present findings suggest a potential signal for Parkinson’s disease related to intravitreal ranibizumab. This is supported by several biologically plausible mechanisms but requires confirmation through pharmacoepidemiological studies, especially because of the low number of cases.

Objective The aim of this retrospective population-based cohort study is to in-depth investigate gender-specific drug utilization pattern in pediatric outpatient population. Methods By using a large administrative database of the Local Health Unit of Caserta (Southern Italy), a pediatric cohort from the birth to 18 years has been observed over six years (from 1st January 2010 to 31st December 2015). Yearly prevalence of drug use per 100 inhabitants as well as the median number of prescriptions was stratifying by gender. Prevalence of acute and recurrent use of the most frequently used active substances has been calculated for the year 2015. Results A decreasing trend of prevalence of drug use (by 3.2%, with a reduction of median prescription number) was observed in children for both sexes, from 2010 to 2015. In 2015, the drug classes most commonly used among children of any age were modestly but consistently prescribed more to males than to females: systemic anti-infective drugs (M=43.5%; F=42.3%), respiratory tract drugs (M=29.0%; F=26.1%), and hormones (M=13.1%; F=11.3%). Irrespective to the gender, beclomethasone was the most utilized active substance in the first two years of life, while thereafter amoxicillin/clavulanate in combination. Conclusions In a large scale of pediatric outpatients no major difference was seen between genders, although commonly used drug classes, in particular, antibiotics, respiratory tract drugs and hormones are prescribed modestly but consistently more to males than to females. Our utilization data can support research exercises on specific medicine that could have a large impact on pediatric population.

Aim: Primary endpoint was to report polypharmacy distribution in the general population vs ≥65 years old people and to examine the frequency of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) in the Health Local Unit of Palermo, Italy, in relationship with patients’ age. Methods: Drug prescription data for the year 2014 were extracted from the database of the Local Health Unit of Palermo Province, Italy. Patients were divided into five age groups (0–13, 14–64, 65–69, 70–74, and ≥75 year old). The detection of potential DDIs in polypharmacy profiles was performed with NavFarma software (Infologic srl, Padova, Italia), with DDI classification provided by tool Micromedex Drug Reax (Truven Health Analitics, Michigan, USA). Results: We analyzed data of 1,324,641 patients, and 15,801,191 medical prescription were recorded; of these, 11,337,796 regarded chronic conditions. The drug prescriptions reached the highest values in the 65–69 and 70–74 age groups (p = 0.005 and p = 0.008 vs age 14–64 respectively). An overall amount of 6,094,373 DDIs were detected, of which 47,173 were contraindicated. Median number of DDIs was higher in 65–69 and 70–74 age groups (p = 0.008 and p = 0.012 vs age 14–64, respectively). Regarding contraindicated DDIs a significant difference was detected comparing 14–64 vs ≥65 age groups (p = 0.010 vs 65–69 group, p= 0.005 vs 70–74 group and ≥75 group). Conclusions: Polypharmacy is a phenomenon acquiring increasing dimensions also in our province. It interests particularly the older subjects, and assumes a dramatic accent when it is put in relationship with the frequency of DDIs. A proactive vigilance about potential life threatening drug interactions is mandatory.