Search

Increasing evidence links changes in epigenetic systems, such as DNA methylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNA expression, to the occurrence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). These epigenetic modifications can change genetic function under influence of exogenous stimuli and can be transferred to next generations, providing a potential mechanism for inheritance of behavioural intervention effects. The benefits of exercise and nutritional interventions in the primary and secondary prevention of CVD are well established, but the mechanisms are not completely understood. In this review, we describe the acute and chronic epigenetic effects of physical activity and dietary changes. We propose exercise and nutrition as potential triggers of epigenetic signals, promoting the reshaping of transcriptional programmes with effects on CVD phenotypes. Finally, we highlight recent developments in epigenetic therapeutics with implications for primary and secondary CVD prevention., European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 29 (17), ISSN:2047-4873, ISSN:2047-4881

Although the burden of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasing, there is no therapy available that improves prognosis. Clinical trials using beta blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, cardiac-targeting drugs that reduce mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), have had disappointing results in HFpEF patients. A new “whole-systems” approach has been proposed for designing future HFpEF therapies, moving focus from the cardiomyocyte to the endothelium. Indeed, dysfunction of endothelial cells throughout the entire cardiovascular system is suggested as a central mechanism in HFpEF pathophysiology. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of current knowledge regarding endothelial dysfunction in HFpEF. We discuss the molecular and cellular mechanisms leading to endothelial dysfunction and the extent, presence, and prognostic importance of clinical endothelial dysfunction in different vascular beds. We also consider implications towards exercise training, a promising therapy targeting system-wide endothelial dysfunction in HFpEF.

AimsDiastolic stress testing (DST) is recommended to confirm heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients with exertional dyspnea, but current algorithms do not detect all patients. We aimed to identify additional echocardiographic markers of elevated pulmonary arterial wedge pressure during exercise (exPAWP) in patients referred for DST. Methods and ResultsWe identified candidate parameters in 22 patients referred for exercise right heart catheterization with simultaneous echocardiography. Elevated exPAWP (>= 25 mmHg) was present in 14 patients, and was best identified by peak septal systolic annular velocity exS', area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.92-1.0] and mean pulmonary artery pressure/cardiac output slope >= 3.2 mmHg/L [mPAP/CO, AUC 0.88 (0.72-1.0)]. We propose a decision tree to identify patients with elevated exPAWP. Applying this decision tree to 326 patients in an independent non-invasive DST cohort showed that patients labeled as "high probability of HFpEF" (n = 85) had reduced peak oxygen uptake [13.0 (10.7-15.1) mL/kg/min, p < 0.001 vs. intermediate/low probability], high H2FPEF score [53 (40-72) %, p < 0.001 vs. intermediate/low probability], and typical clinical characteristics. The diagnostic yield of DST increased from 11% using exercise E/e', to 62% using the decision tree. ConclusionIn DST for suspected HFpEF, exS' was the most accurate echocardiographic parameter to identify elevated PAWP. We propose a decision tree including exS' and mPAP/CO for interpretation of DST. Application of this decision tree revealed typical HFpEF characteristics in patients labeled as high probability of HFpEF, and substantially reduced the number of inconclusive results. FV is supported by the Special Research Fund (BOF) of Hasselt University (BOF19PD04). GC is supported by the Frans Van De Werf Fund for Clinical Cardiovascular Research and the Mathilde Horlait-Dapsens Scholarship. We thank the sonographers, nurses and cardiology fellows at the Department of Cardiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt for their invaluable assistance during the exRHC and DST procedures.

The benefit of regular physical activity and exercise training for the prevention of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases is undisputed. Many molecular mechanisms mediating exercise effects have been deciphered. Personalised exercise prescription can help patients in achieving their individual greatest benefit from an exercise-based cardiovascular rehabilitation programme. Yet, we still struggle to provide truly personalised exercise prescriptions to our patients. In this position paper, we address novel basic and translational research concepts that can help us understand the principles underlying the inter-individual differences in the response to exercise, and identify early on who would most likely benefit from which exercise intervention. This includes hereditary, non-hereditary and sex-specific concepts. Recent insights have helped us to take on a more holistic view, integrating exercise-mediated molecular mechanisms with those influenced by metabolism and immunity. Unfortunately, while the outline is recognisable, many details are still lacking to turn the understanding of a concept into a roadmap ready to be used in clinical routine. This position paper therefore also investigates perspectives on how the advent of 'big data' and the use of animal models could help unravel inter-individual responses to exercise parameters and thus influence hypothesis-building for translational research in exercise-based cardiovascular rehabilitation. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: TSB is supported by a Medical Research Council UK New Investigator award (MR/S025472/1). EMVC is supported by Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (Senior Clinical Investigator fellowship) and Koning Boudewijnstichting (Fund Joseph Oscar Waldmann-Berteau 2015). NK receives project-specific funding from the German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK; 81X2100238 and 81X2100243), the German Foundation of Heart Research (F/39/17) and the German Diabetes Foundation (FP-0421-2018). ABG, VA, MB, VC, MD, DH, HMCK and PL do not receive funding pertinent to this work.