Search

Supplemental material, cic_901491 for One-Year Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease by Daniel Y Lu, Matthew D Saybolt, Daniel H Kiss, William H Matthai, Kimberly A Forde, Jay Giri and Robert L Wilensky in Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

ObjectiveLow muscle mass is associated with reduced survival in HIV, possibly mediated by systemic inflammation. Viral hepatitis coinfection can induce additional inflammation and hepatic dysfunction that may exacerbate low muscle mass. We determined the prevalence of and risk factors for low muscle mass in HIV/viral hepatitis coinfection.Design and methodsA cross-sectional study of participants in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study and Women's Interagency HIV Study with anthropometry performed after 1 January 2000. Viral hepatitis defined by positive hepatitis B virus surface antigen and/or hepatitis C virus RNA. Low muscle mass defined as less than 10th percentile of age-matched and sex-matched reference values for mid-upper arm circumference. Using multivariable logistic regression, we determined adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the association of HIV/viral hepatitis coinfection with low muscle mass and factors associated with low muscle mass in coinfected persons. Analyses adjusted for age, race, BMI, alcohol use, and IDU (also, nadir CD4 cell count and HIV RNA where appropriate).ResultsAmong 3518 participants (164 HIV/viral hepatitis, 223 viral hepatitis alone, 1070 HIV alone, and 2061 uninfected), HIV/viral hepatitis-coinfected persons had a 3.50-fold (95% CI, 1.51-8.09), 1.93-fold (1.17-3.20), and 2.65-fold (1.62-4.35) higher odds of low muscle mass than viral hepatitis-monoinfected, HIV-monoinfected, and uninfected persons, respectively. Lack of HIV RNA suppression [odds ratio, 2.26 (95% CI, 1.10-4.63)] was the only factor associated with low muscle mass in coinfected persons.ConclusionHIV/viral hepatitis-coinfected persons have a higher likelihood of low muscle mass than those with viral hepatitis monoinfection, HIV monoinfection, or neither infection. HIV viremia is an important risk factor for low muscle mass among coinfected persons.

The validity of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes to identify diagnoses of severe acute liver injury (SALI) is not well known. We examined the positive predictive values (PPVs) of hospital ICD-9-CM diagnoses in identifying SALI among health plan members in the Mini-Sentinel Distributed Database (MSDD) for patients without liver/biliary disease and for those with chronic liver disease (CLD).We selected random samples of members (149 without liver/biliary disease; 75 with CLD) with a principal hospital diagnosis suggestive of SALI (ICD-9-CM 570, 572.2, 572.4, 572.8, 573.3, 573.8, or V42.7) in the MSDD (2009-2010). Medical records were reviewed by hepatologists to confirm SALI events. PPVs of codes and code combinations for confirmed SALI were determined by CLD status.Among 105 members with available records and no liver/biliary disease, SALI was confirmed in 26 (PPV, 24.7%; 95%CI, 16.9-34.1%). Combined hospital diagnoses of acute hepatic necrosis (570) and liver disease sequelae (572.8) had high PPV (100%; 95%CI, 59.0-100%) and identified 7/26 (26.9%) events. Among 46 CLD members with available records, SALI was confirmed in 19 (PPV, 41.3%; 95%CI, 27.0-56.8%). Acute hepatic necrosis (570) or hepatorenal syndrome (572.4) plus any other SALI code had a PPV of 83.3% (95%CI, 51.6-97.9%) and identified 10/19 (52.6%) events.Most individual hospital ICD-9-CM diagnoses had low PPV for confirmed SALI events. Select code combinations had high PPV but did not capture all events.

Before using computerized databases to study hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemiology, the validity of the diagnosis must be assessed. We determined the accuracy of HCV diagnostic codes within The Health Improvement Network (THIN), an electronic database containing medical record data from general medical practices in the United Kingdom.Patients with initial diagnostic codes for HCV infection and nonspecific viral hepatitis between 2000 and 2007 in the THIN database were identified. Questionnaires were mailed to general practitioners caring for a random sample of 150 of these patients (75 with an HCV code; 75 with a nonspecific viral hepatitis code) to collect information on HCV and other hepatitis diagnoses. We determined the positive predictive value of the database's HCV diagnostic codes and its ability to identify the date of a new HCV diagnosis.Usable surveys were returned for 146 (97%) patients. Among 74 patients with an HCV code and questionnaire data, HCV was confirmed in 64 (positive predictive value, 86%; 95%CI, 77-93%). In 40 (63%), the first recorded diagnosis in THIN was within 30 days of the date reported in the questionnaire (median difference, 11 days; interquartile range, 0-362 days). Among 72 patients with a nonspecific viral hepatitis code, 16 (22%) had HCV, but manual review of the database's electronic records correctly identified 12/16 (75%).In THIN, the HCV-specific diagnostic codes are highly predictive of HCV infection. After manual review, few patients with a nonspecific viral hepatitis code were misclassified as having HCV infection.

Laboratory results of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected, chronic HCV-monoinfected, and HIV-monoinfected participants.

Laboratory results of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected, chronic HCV-monoinfected, and HIV-monoinfected participants.