Search

Background and Objective: A retrospective, noninterventional cohort study of the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS Registry, an electronic health record (EHR)-based comprehensive eye disease and condition registry, intended to assess whether the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) could emulate the VIEW randomized clinical trials (VIEW RCTs) eligibility criteria, treatment protocol regimen, and primary endpoint. Patients and Methods: Deidentified patients having an anti-VEGF injection of aflibercept or ranibizumab between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2018, from the IRIS Registry. Patients were treated in accordance with one of three treatment regimens from the VIEW RCT: monthly intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI 2Q4), intravitreal aflibercept every 2 months after 3 initial monthly doses (IAI 2Q8), or monthly ranibizumab (RQ4) injection. The main outcome measures are the number and proportion of patients meeting VIEW RCT eligibility and treatment group criteria, demographic, and clinical differences between IRIS Registry treatment groups, mean change in best documented visual acuity at one year, and evaluation of the primary endpoint of the VIEW RCT: difference in the proportion of patients maintaining vision. Results: Among the 90,900 patients who met VIEW RCT eligibility criteria, 4,457 (4.85%) met treatment group criteria. The percentage of patients maintaining vision at one year was over 90%. No statistically significant difference was observed when comparing the proportion of patients maintaining vision among the RQ4 treatment group to the IAI 2Q4 or IAI 2Q8 treatment group. Conclusions: A small percentage of real-world patients met VIEW RCT study eligibility criteria and treatment protocol regimen. Among patients meeting all available criteria, the primary endpoint interpretation yielded by an observational EHR-based dataset suggested comparable results to the VIEW RCT. [ Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:6–14.]

To compare patient demographic data; level of severity; and clinical, diagnostic, and surgical practice patterns in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in an academic setting vs nonacademic setting using the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).A retrospective cohort study of IRIS Registry data that included patients with POAG who were seen between January 2016 and December 2019 and had at least 1 year of follow-up.Of 3 707 084 distinct eyes with POAG, 3% (109 920) were included in the academic subcohort and 97% (3 597 164) were included in the nonacademic subcohort. Among the findings of greatest note (P.0001 for all comparisons) were a higher proportion of eyes of Black patients, a higher proportion of eyes with level 3 severity, and a higher mean cup-to-disc ratio in eyes in the academic setting. The relative frequency of gonioscopy, pachymetry, and visual field testing in conjunction with new patient visits was also notably higher in the academic setting. For glaucoma surgical procedures, the greatest proportional differences in relative frequency were seen for tube shunt procedures (2.55-fold higher in the academic setting), iStent and Hydrus procedures (2.52-fold higher in the nonacademic setting), and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (5.80-fold higher in the nonacademic setting).Based on IRIS Registry data, notable differences appear to exist with regard to ethnoracial groups, glaucoma severity, and diagnostic and surgical practice patterns in academic vs nonacademic settings. By understanding these differences, potential opportunities exist in the development of educational programs related to clinical and surgical glaucoma care.

To assess risk factors for repeat keratoplasty after endothelial keratoplasty (EK).Retrospective cohort study.EK procedures performed between 2013 and 2018 in the IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) were identified.Patients aged 18 years and older who underwent EK.(1) Risk factors for repeat keratoplasty and (2) complication rates after EK. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine the probability of repeat keratoplasty. A multivariable shared frailty survival model was used to assess risk factors.A total of 59 344 procedures were identified in the registry, of which 30 600 EK procedures met the inclusion criteria for the analysis. The probability of repeat keratoplasty was 17.4% (95% CI 16.7-18.0) at 5 years. Risk factors for repeat keratoplasty include postoperative rebubbling procedure (HR 2.24, 95% CI 2.05-2.45), prior failed graft (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.84-2.32) or bullous keratopathy (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.33-1.61) vs Fuchs dystrophy as surgical indication; subsequent routine cataract surgery (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.45-1.79), as well as subsequent (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.39-1.69) and prior/concurrent (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11-1.36) glaucoma surgery or history of glaucoma (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.14-1.35). Medicaid (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.13-1.92), military/government (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03-1.60), Medicare Fee-for-Service (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05-1.31) or Medicare Managed (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01-1.36) insurances vs private insurance, as well as Black vs White race (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11-1.40) and smoking (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.27) were also associated with an increased risk of undergoing repeat keratoplasty.Black race, government-based insurance plans, and smoking were identified as independent factors associated with repeat keratoplasty in addition to history of glaucoma, glaucoma surgery, and prior graft failure or bullous keratopathy as surgical indication.

The American Academy of Ophthalmology evaluated the practice of routine screening for intraocular infection from Candida septicemia. In the United States, ophthalmologists are consulted in the hospital to screen for intraocular infection routinely for patients with Candida bloodstream infections. This practice was established in the era before the use of systemic antifungal medication and the establishment of definitions of ocular disease with candidemia. A recent systematic review found a rate of less than 1% of routinely screened patients with endophthalmitis from Candida septicemia. Other studies found higher rates of endophthalmitis but had limitations in terms of inaccuracies in ocular disease classification, lack of vitreous biopsies, selection biases, and lack of longer-term visual outcomes. Some studies attributed ocular findings to Candida infections, rather than other comorbidities. Studies also have not demonstrated differences in medical management that are modified for eye disease treatment; therefore, therapy should be dictated by the underlying Candida infection, rather than be tailored on the basis of ocular findings. In summary, the Academy does not recommend a routine ophthalmologic consultation after laboratory findings of systemic Candida septicemia, which appears to be a low-value practice. An ophthalmologic consultation is a reasonable practice for a patient with signs or symptoms suggestive of ocular infection regardless of Candida septicemia.

Purpose Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is increasingly performed at the time of cataract extraction. Understanding the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients undergoing MIGS procedures may provide insight into patient selection. This study evaluates racial-ethnic and other differences in the use of MIGS in persons with cataract and open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Design Retrospective cohort study using Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry data. Participants Patients aged ≥ 40 years with a diagnosis of OAG and no history of MIGS or cataract surgery who were undergoing cataract extraction, with or without MIGS, during 2013 to 2017 in the United States. Methods Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Main Outcome Measures Variables assessed include age, sex, race-ethnicity, disease severity, insurance type, census region, comorbidity, and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR). Results The odds of MIGS use was greater among patients who were aged ≥ 60 years (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.05–1.16]); Black (OR, 1.11 [CI, 1.07–1.15]) compared with White; a Medicare recipient (OR, 1.12 [CI, 1.10–1.15]) versus privately insured; or in the Midwest (OR, 1.32 [CI, 1.28–1.36]) or Northeast (OR, 1.26 [CI, 1.22–1.30]) compared with the South. Having moderate rather than mild glaucoma (OR, 1.07 [CI, 1.04–1.11]) and a higher CDR (OR for 0.5 to 0.8 vs. 0.8 to 1.0 vs. Conclusions This analysis highlights the importance of capturing race-ethnicity data and other pertinent patient characteristics in electronic health records to provide insight into practice patterns. Such data can be used to assess the long-term performance of MIGS and other procedures in various patient populations.

Purpose To identify systematic reviews of interventions for glaucoma conditions and to assess their reliability, thereby generating a list of potentially reliable reviews for updating glaucoma practice guidelines. Design Cross-sectional study. Participants Systematic reviews of interventions for glaucoma conditions. Methods We used a database of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vision research and eye care maintained by the Cochrane Eyes and Vision United States Satellite. We examined all Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions for glaucoma conditions published before August 7, 2019, and all non-Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions for glaucoma conditions published between January 1, 2014, and August 7, 2019. Main Outcome Measures We assessed eligible reviews for reliability, extracted characteristics, and summarized key findings from reviews classified as reliable. Results Of the 4451 systematic reviews in eyes and vision identified, 129 met our eligibility criteria and were assessed for reliability. Of these, we classified 49 (38%) as reliable. We found open-angle glaucoma (22/49) to be the condition with the most reviews and medical management (17/49) and intraocular pressure (IOP; 43/49) to be the most common interventions and outcomes studied. Most reviews found a high degree of uncertainty in the evidence, which hinders the possibility of making strong recommendations in guidelines. These reviews found high-certainty evidence about a few topics: reducing IOP helps to prevent glaucoma and its progression, prostaglandin analogs are the most effective medical treatment for lowering IOP, laser trabeculoplasty is as effective as medical treatment as a first-line therapy in controlling IOP, the use of IOP-lowering medications in the perioperative or postoperative periods to accompany laser (e.g., trabeculoplasty) reduces the risk of postoperative IOP spikes, conventional surgery (i.e., trabeculectomy) is more effective than medications in reducing IOP, and antimetabolites and β-radiation improve IOP control after trabeculectomy. The evidence is weak regarding the effectiveness of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries. Conclusions Most systematic reviews evaluating interventions for glaucoma are of poor reliability. Even among those that may be considered reliable, important limitations exist in the value of information because of the uncertainty of the evidence as well as small and sometimes unimportant clinical differences between interventions.

Purpose This study compared 1-year results for the composite treatment outcome from the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) randomized controlled trial (RCT) to those from an IRISⓇ (Intelligent Research In Sight) Registry cohort of analogous eyes. Design Retrospective clinical study with comparison to an RCT. Methods Subjects’ eyes in the IRIS Registry received either a glaucoma drainage implant (tube) or underwent trabeculectomy after a previous trabeculectomy and/or cataract extraction and had data for 1-year follow-up analyses. Outcome Eyes were classified as failing if they had hypotony (intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤5 mm Hg) or inadequate IOP control (IOP >21 mm Hg or not reduced at least 20% below baseline) on 2 consecutive follow-up visits after 3 months, a reoperation for glaucoma, or no light perception vision and as successful otherwise. Failure risk was compared by treatment, demographic, and clinical variables and was compared to analogous failure risks from the TVT RCT. Results The TVT IRIS Registry cohort included 419 eyes, 236 tube eyes (56.3%) and 183 trabeculectomy eyes (43.7%). In this cohort, there was no significant failure risk difference (12.3% for tube eyes and 16.4% for trabeculectomy eyes, P = 0.231). Comparing the studies, there was a significantly greater risk of failure in the TVT IRIS Registry tube eyes than in the TVT RCT tube eyes (3.8%; P Conclusions Our results were different from those in the TVT RCT. Possible reasons include non-Baerveldt tubes, greater severity among tube eyes, and practice patterns that reflect real-world data, which are different than those in RCTs.

In 2019, the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) created the Task Force on Myopia in recognition of the substantial global increases in myopia prevalence and its associated complications. The Task Force, led by Richard L. Abbott, MD, and Donald Tan, MD, comprised recognized experts in myopia prevention and treatment, public health experts from around the world, and organization representatives from the American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Optometry, and American Academy of Pediatrics. The Academy's Board of Trustees believes that myopia is a high-priority cause of visual impairment, warranting a timely evaluation and synthesis of the scientific literature and formulation of an action plan to address the issue from different perspectives. This includes education of physicians and other health care providers, patients and their families, schools, and local and national public health agencies; defining health policies to ameliorate patients' access to appropriate therapy and to promote effective public health interventions; and fostering promising avenues of research.

Purpose Detailed study of ophthalmic immune-related adverse events (AEs), including determination of incidence and recurrence rates, is of integral importance in cancer immunotherapy to inform management and treatment guidelines. Design Retrospective registry study. Participants Patients newly diagnosed with ophthalmic immune-related AEs between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017, in the American Academy of Ophthalmology’s Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry. Methods Data were collected from electronic health records of IRIS® Registry participating ophthalmology practices. Patients with select ophthalmic immune-related AEs were identified by International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes. The primary exposure of interest was prior initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Main Outcome Measures Incidence of ophthalmic immune-related AEs within 1 year after initiation of ICI therapy was determined. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were derived by comparing incidence of ophthalmic immune-related AEs after ICIs versus rates of the same ocular complications in patients not taking ICIs in the entire registry population. Rates of ophthalmic immune-related AEs in patients with a past history of ocular inflammation or other specific ophthalmic condition before initiation of ICIs were examined further. Results A total of 3123 patients who received anti-CTLA-4 or anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) therapy were identified, 112 of whom demonstrated an ophthalmic immune-related AE. Incidence rates for anterior uveitis, the most common ophthalmic immune-related AE, were 8209 per 100 000 for ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4), 2542 per 100 000 for nivolumab (anti-PD-1), 2451 per 100 000 for pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1), 5556 per 100 000 for ipilimumab plus nivolumab, and 3740 per 100 000 among all ICIs. Rates of ophthalmic immune-related AEs among patients receiving ICI therapy were higher compared with baseline rates in the general registry population (anterior uveitis IRR, 13.9; other uveitis IRR, 43.0; papilledema IRR, 38.3). Patients with a history of uveitis or other ocular inflammatory condition demonstrated high recurrence rates of ophthalmic immune-related AEs after initiating ICIs (up to 51.1%). Conclusions For patients initiating ICI therapy, early coordination with ophthalmic subspecialist care is important because rates of ophthalmic immune-related AEs are elevated compared with ocular complication rates in the entire registry population and patients with a history of prior autoimmune ocular disease are at high risk of recurrence of ocular complications.

PurposeTo assess the prevalence and risk factors of blindness among patients newly diagnosed with primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) in the United States (US).DesignRetrospective cross-sectional study of patients from the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry.ParticipantsPatients in the IRIS® Registry between the years 2015 to 2019 with a new diagnosis of PACG and visual acuity (VA) data on or within 90 days prior to the date of diagnosis.MethodsEligible patients were aged 18 years and older and: (1) were observable in the database at least 24 months prior to the index date of PACG diagnosis; (2) had no history of intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering drops, laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI), cataract surgery, or a diagnosis of pseudophakia unless preceded by a diagnosis of anatomical narrow angle (ANA); and (3) had no history of glaucoma surgery. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to assess risk factors of blindness.Main Outcome MeasuresAny (one or both eyes) or bilateral (both eyes) blindness (VA ≤ 20/200) at first diagnosis of PACG.Results43,901 patients with PACG in the IRIS® Registry met inclusion criteria. Overall prevalence of any and bilateral blindness were 11.5% and 1.8%, respectively. Black and Hispanic patients were at higher risk of any (OR=1.42 and 1.21, respectively; p80 years, male sex, Medicaid or Medicare insurance category, and Southern or Western practice region (ORs>1.28; p≤0.01). Diagnosis of ANA prior to diagnosis of PACG was protective against any (OR=0.56; pConclusionsBlindness affects 1 out of 9 patients with newly diagnosed PACG in the IRIS® Registry; Black and Hispanic patients and Medicaid and Medicare recipients are significantly more vulnerable. These findings highlight the severe ocular morbidity associated with PACG and the need for increased disease awareness and improved detection methods.

To describe the drivers, development, and current state of the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research In Sight), and analytics involving deidentified aggregate IRIS Registry data.The IRIS Registry has a core mission of quality improvement and reporting. In addition, analytic projects performed to date have included characterizing patient populations and diseases, incidence, and prevalence; clinical outcomes and complications; risk factors and effect modifiers; practice patterns; and trends over time. Pipeline projects include application of artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches for predictive modeling and analytics, disease mapping, detecting patterns and identifying cohorts, and optimizing treatment based on patient-specific characteristics.The IRIS Registry is the nation's largest single specialty clinical registry, with unique data elements specific to ophthalmology. It offers a wealth of opportunities involving big data analytics, including traditional inferential statistics as well as machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches scalable on massive amounts of data.

To present multivariable analyses of factors associated with amblyopia treatment success using outcomes from a clinical registry.Retrospective database study.New patients 3 to 12 years of age being enrolled in the registry from 2013 to 2019.The IRIS-50 is an outcome measure for amblyopia treatment developed by the American Academy of Ophthalmology for use with data in the Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry. The measure specifications include unilateral amblyopia associated with strabismus, refractive error, or both.Clinical care prescribed by the ophthalmologist.Eighteen thousand eight hundred forty-one children 3 to 7 years of age were eligible for IRIS-50, with 77.3% successful. Nine thousand seven hundred sixty-two children 8 to 12 years of age were eligible, with 55.5% successful. For the younger age group, multivariable analyses found that odds ratios (ORs) for success were significantly lower for Black children (0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.83) compared with White children. Medicaid insurance was associated independently with significantly lower success (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.60-0.71). Among older children, Black children were less likely to be treated successfully (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96) compared with White children, whereas Hispanic children showed an increased chance of success (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.31). Medicaid insurance for the older children also was associated with a decreased chance of success (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77-0.93).Amblyopia treatment outcomes measured by IRIS-50 were significantly poorer for Black children and those with Medicaid insurance 3 to 12 years of age. Disparate health outcomes demonstrated for these two factors emphasize the need to develop and test strategies to improve treatment outcomes for these children.

To describe real-world intraocular pressure (IOP) changes following stand-alone cataract surgery by comparing postoperative IOP to phakic fellow eyes.Retrospective clinical cohort study.A total of 1,334,868 patients (336,060 with glaucoma and 998,808 without glaucoma) in the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) underwent stand-alone phacoemulsification from 1 January 2013 to 30 September 2019 with a fellow eye that had subsequent cataract surgery. Postoperative daily mean IOP was compared between surgical and control eyes from postoperative day 1 to 90. A generalized linear model determined when the postoperative daily mean IOP stabilized to calculate a final mean IOP, which was then compared to baseline IOP.Postoperative daily mean IOP was initially greater for surgical than for control eyes because of an early postoperative IOP spike. By postoperative day 13, postoperative daily mean IOP was significantly lower for surgical than for control eyes every day through postoperative day 90 (P.001). There was a mean (SD) decrease from baseline to final mean IOP of 1.55 (3.52) mm Hg or 7.79% for all surgical eyes, 1.91 (3.93) mm Hg or 8.89% for surgical eyes with glaucoma, and 1.37 (3.28) mm Hg or 7.24% for surgical eyes without glaucoma, respectively. There was a statistically significant decrease from baseline to the final mean IOP for all surgical eyes, surgical eyes without glaucoma, and all categories of pre-glaucoma and glaucoma (P.0001 for all, excluding uveitic glaucoma [P = .0016]).Eyes both with and without glaucoma that underwent stand-alone phacoemulsification had a significant decrease in IOP through the 90-day postoperative period compared to baseline and phakic fellow eyes.

Purpose To investigate the rate of return to the operating room after vitrectomy surgery for vitreous opacities. Design Retrospective registry cohort. Participants Individuals receiving care in ophthalmology practices participating in the Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry. Methods Data from the IRIS Registry were analyzed for patients who underwent vitrectomy for vitreous opacities. Cases were identified by the combination of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), codes (379.21, 379.22, 379.24, and 379.25), and a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code for vitrectomy surgery. Main Outcome Measures The number and percentage of eyes that underwent additional eye surgery within 1 year after vitrectomy for vitreous opacities were identified, as was the nature of the additional procedures per CPT code. Results Fifty thousand eight hundred thirty-six eyes that underwent vitrectomy surgery linked to one of the ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CM codes for vitreous opacities were identified. In 17 615 eyes, the surgery was linked to the vitreous opacities code exclusively, and not to epiretinal membrane or macular hole codes. Of these, 2187 eyes (12.4%) returned to the operating room for cataract surgery, and 643 eyes (3.7%) returned to the operating room for a noncataract procedure. Four hundred fifty-seven eyes (2.6%) returned to the operating room for retinal detachment repair. Conclusions In the IRIS Registry, eyes undergoing vitrectomy for vitreous opacities returned to the operating room for an ophthalmic surgery other than cataract extraction 3.7% of the time, and retinal detachment repair was performed 2.6% of the time.

Purpose To model Medicare Part B and patient savings associated with increased bevacizumab payment and utilization for intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. Design Cost analysis. Methods Medicare claims and IRIS® Registry data were used to calculate Medicare Part B expenditures and patient co-pays for anti-VEGF agents with increasing reimbursement and utilization of bevacizumab relative to ranibizumab and aflibercept. Main outcome measures Medicare Part B costs and patient co-pays for anti-VEGF agents in the Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) population. Results Increasing bevacizumab reimbursement to $125.78, equalizing the dollar margin with aflibercept, would result in Medicare Part B savings of $468 million and patient savings of $119 million with a 10% increase in bevacizumab market share. Conclusions Increased utilization of bevacizumab achievable with increased reimbursement to eliminate the financial disincentive to its use would result in substantial savings to the Medicare Part B program and to patients receiving anti-VEGF intravitreal injections.

Purpose To compare the average intraocular pressure (IOP) among smokers, past smokers, and never smokers using the American Academy of Ophthalmology Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry. Design Retrospective database study of the IRIS® Registry data. Participants Intelligent Research in Sight Registry patients who were seen by an eye care provider during 2017. Methods Patients were divided into current smoker, past smoker, and never smoker categories. The IOP was based on an average measurement, and separate analyses were performed in patients with and without a glaucoma diagnosis based on International Classification of Diseases (Ninth Edition and Tenth Edition) codes. Stratified, descriptive statistics by glaucoma status were determined, and the relationship between smoking and IOP was assessed with a multivariate linear regression model. Main Outcome Measures Mean IOP. Results A total of 12 535 013 patients were included. Compared with never smokers, current and past smokers showed a statistically significantly higher IOP by 0.92 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–0.95 mmHg) and 0.77 mmHg (95% CI, 0.75–0.79 mmHg), respectively, after adjusting for age, gender, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, cataract, glaucoma surgery, cataract surgery, and first-order interactions. In addition, the difference in IOP between current and never smokers was the highest in the fourth decade, regardless of the glaucoma status (glaucoma group, 1.14 mmHg [95% CI, 1.00–1.29 mmHg]; without glaucoma group, 0.68 mmHg [95% CI, 0.65–0.71 mmHg]). Conclusions Current smokers and past smokers have higher IOP than patients who never smoked. This difference is higher in patients with an underlying glaucoma diagnosis.

Purpose To determine recent incidence and visual outcomes for acute-onset endophthalmitis after cataract surgery performed in the United States. Design Retrospective cohort study. Participants United States cataract surgery patients, 2013-2017 (5 401 686 patients). Methods Cases of acute-onset postoperative endophthalmitis occurring within 30 days after cataract surgery were identified using diagnosis codes in the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry database, drawn from electronic health records in ophthalmology practices across the nation. Annual and aggregate 5-year incidences were determined for all cataract surgeries and specifically for standalone procedures versus those combined with other ophthalmic surgeries. Patient characteristics were compared. Mean and median visual acuity was determined at 1 month preoperative as well as 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperative among patients with and without endophthalmitis. Main Outcome Measures Incidence of acute-onset postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. Results A total of 8 542 838 eyes underwent cataract surgery, 3629 of which developed acute-onset endophthalmitis (0.04%; 95% confidence interval, 0.04%–0.04%). Endophthalmitis incidence was highest among patients aged 0 to 17 years (0.37% over 5 years), followed by patients aged 18 to 44 years (0.18% over 5 years; P Conclusions Acute-onset endophthalmitis occurred in 0.04% of 8 542 838 cataract surgeries performed in the United States between 2013 and 2017. Risk factors may include younger age, cataract surgery combined with other ophthalmic surgeries, and anterior vitrectomy. Visual acuity outcomes vary; however, patients can recover excellent vision after surgery. Big data from clinical registries like the IRIS Registry has great potential for evaluating rare conditions such as endophthalmitis, including developing benchmarks, longer-term time trend investigation, and comprehensive analysis of risk factors and prophylaxis.

Concussion is a common injury in childhood and has the potential for substantial impact on quality of life. Visual issues have been increasingly recognized as a common problem after concussion. Many children initially seek care for concussion with their pediatrician, making it even more important for pediatricians to recognize, evaluate, and refer children with visual issues after concussion. This clinical report is intended to support the recommendations in the companion policy statement on vision and concussion and provides definitions of some of the physiologic aspects of the visual system as they relate to concussion. A description of clinically feasible testing methodologies is provided in more detail to aid the clinician in assessing the visual system in a focused fashion after concussion. This guidance helps direct clinical management, including support for return to school, sports, and other activities, as well as potential referral for subspecialty care for the subset of those with persistent symptoms.

Visual symptoms are common after concussion in children and adolescents, making it essential for clinicians to understand how to screen, identify, and initiate clinical management of visual symptoms in pediatric patients after this common childhood injury. Although most children and adolescents with visual symptoms after concussion will recover on their own by 4 weeks, for a subset who do not have spontaneous recovery, referral to a specialist with experience in comprehensive concussion management (eg, sports medicine, neurology, neuropsychology, physiatry, ophthalmology, otorhinolaryngology) for additional assessment and treatment may be necessary. A vision-specific history and a thorough visual system examination are warranted, including an assessment of visual acuity, ocular alignment in all positions of gaze, smooth pursuit (visual tracking of a moving object), saccades (visual fixation shifting between stationary targets), vestibulo-ocular reflex (maintaining image focus during movement), near point of convergence (focusing with both eyes at near and accommodation (focusing with one eye at near because any of these functions may be disturbed after concussion. These deficits may contribute to difficulty with returning to both play and the learning setting at school, making the identification of these problems early after injury important for the clinician to provide relevant learning accommodations, such as larger font, preprinted notes, and temporary use of audio books. Early identification and appropriate management of visual symptoms, such as convergence insufficiency or accommodative insufficiency, may mitigate the negative effects of concussion on children and adolescents and their quality of life.

To investigate the incidence, seasonal variation, and differences among age, sex, and race for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair, retinal break (RB) treatment, and posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) in the Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry.Retrospective database study.Patients in the IRIS Registry who underwent RRD repair, RB treatment, or cataract surgery (CS) based on Current Procedural Terminology codes and PVD diagnosis based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, codes.Daily incidence rates were defined as the ratio of patients who underwent RRD repair or RB treatment and patients with a diagnosis of PVD to the total number of patients followed on a given day within the IRIS Registry. The CS group was included as a comparison for seasonal variation. Rates were stratified by decade of life, sex, and race.Time series trends for incidence rates of RRD, RB, and PVD.A total of 7 115 774 patients received a diagnosis of incident PVD, 237 646 patients underwent RRD repair, and 359 022 patients underwent RB treatment. Also included were 5 940 448 patients who underwent CS. The mean daily incidence for RRD repair, RB treatment, PVD diagnosis, and CS were 0.46 per 100 000 patients, 0.70 per 100 000 patients, 13.90 per 100 000 patients, and 11.80 per 100 000 patients, respectively. Men showed higher incidence of RRD repair and RB treatment than women, whereas women showed higher incidence of PVD diagnosis. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment incidence was higher in White people compared with other races. Seasonal decreases in PVD, RB treatment, RRD repair, and CS corresponded to national holidays, with larger decreases in winter months. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that RRD repair and RB treatment typically occurred within 60 days of PVD diagnosis.Within the IRIS Registry, the highest incidence of RRD was in the 6th and 7th decade of life. There was a higher incidence of RRD repair and RB treatment in men compared with women. The seasonal variation associated with national holidays was less pronounced for RRD repair and RB treatment.

Purpose To compare the rate of postoperative endophthalmitis after immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) versus delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS) using the American Academy of Ophthalmology Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry database. Design Retrospective cohort study. Participants Patients in the IRIS Registry who underwent cataract surgery from 2013 through 2018. Methods Patients who underwent cataract surgery were divided into 2 groups: (1) ISBCS and (2) DSBCS (second-eye surgery ≥1 day after the first-eye surgery) or unilateral surgery. Postoperative endophthalmitis was defined as endophthalmitis occurring within 4 weeks of surgery by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code and ICD code with additional clinical criteria. Main Outcome Measures Rate of postoperative endophthalmitis. Results Of 5 573 639 IRIS Registry patients who underwent cataract extraction, 165 609 underwent ISBCS, and 5 408 030 underwent DSBCS or unilateral surgery (3 695 440 DSBCS, 1 712 590 unilateral surgery only). A total of 3102 participants (0.056%) met study criteria of postoperative endophthalmitis with supporting clinical findings. The rates of endophthalmitis in either surgery eye between the 2 surgery groups were similar (0.059% in the ISBCS group vs. 0.056% in the DSBCS or unilateral group; P = 0.53). Although the incidence of endophthalmitis was slightly higher in the ISBCS group compared with the DSBCS or unilateral group, the odds ratio did not reach statistical significance (1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.87–1.31; P = 0.47) after adjusting for age, sex, race, insurance status, and comorbid eye disease. Seven cases of bilateral endophthalmitis with supporting clinical data in the DSBCS group and no cases in the ISBCS group were identified. Conclusions Risk of postoperative endophthalmitis was not statistically significantly different between patients who underwent ISBCS and DSBCS or unilateral cataract surgery.

This retrospective analysis of the IRIS ® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) sought to characterize real-world treatment patterns and visual outcomes among patients with diabetic macular edema in US clinical practice.

Purpose To investigate ophthalmologists’ rate of attestation to meaningful use (MU) of their electronic health record (EHR) systems in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program and their continuity and success in receiving payments in comparison with other specialties. Design Administrative database study. Participants Eligible professionals participating in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program. Methods Based on publicly available data sources, subsets of payment and attestation data were created for ophthalmologists and for other specialties. The number of eligible professionals attesting was determined using the attestation data for each year and stage of the program. The proportion of attestations by EHR vendor was calculated using all attestations for each vendor. Main Outcome Measures Numbers of ophthalmologists attesting by year and stage of the Medicare EHR Incentive Program, incentive payments, and number of attestations by EHR vendor. Results In the peak year of participation, 51.6% of ophthalmologists successfully attested to MU, compared with 37.1% of optometrists, 50.2% of dermatologists, 54.5% of otolaryngologists, and 64.4% of urologists. Across the 6 years of the program, ophthalmologists received an average of $17 942 in incentive payments compared with $11 105 for optometrists, $16 617 for dermatologists, $20 203 for otolaryngologists, and $23 821 for urologists. Epic and Nextgen were the most frequently used EHRs for attestation by ophthalmologists. Conclusions Ophthalmology as a specialty performed better than optometry and dermatology, but worse than otolaryngology and urology, in terms of the proportion of eligible professionals attesting to MU of EHRs. Ophthalmologists were more likely to remain in the program after their initial year of attestation compared with all eligible providers. The top 4 EHR vendors accounted for 50% of attestations by ophthalmologists.

Key Points Question How many people in the US are living with uncorrectable visual acuity loss or blindness? Findings This bayesian meta-analysis generated an estimate that, in 2017, there were 7.08 million people living with visual acuity loss, of whom 1.08 million were living with blindness. Meaning Per this study, uncorrectable visual acuity loss and blindness are even larger drivers of health burden in the US than was previously known., This meta-analysis combines population-based surveys and data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vision and Eye Health Surveillance System to produce estimates of visual acuity loss and blindness by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and US state., Importance Globally, more than 250 million people live with visual acuity loss or blindness, and people in the US fear losing vision more than memory, hearing, or speech. But it appears there are no recent empirical estimates of visual acuity loss or blindness for the US. Objective To produce estimates of visual acuity loss and blindness by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and US state. Data Sources Data from the American Community Survey (2017), National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2008), and National Survey of Children’s Health (2017), as well as population-based studies (2000-2013), were included. Study Selection All relevant data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vision and Eye Health Surveillance System were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis The prevalence of visual acuity loss or blindness was estimated, stratified when possible by factors including US state, age group, sex, race/ethnicity, and community-dwelling or group-quarters status. Data analysis occurred from March 2018 to March 2020. Main Outcomes or Measures The prevalence of visual acuity loss (defined as a best-corrected visual acuity greater than or equal to 0.3 logMAR) and blindness (defined as a logMAR of 1.0 or greater) in the better-seeing eye. Results For 2017, this meta-analysis generated an estimated US prevalence of 7.08 (95% uncertainty interval, 6.32-7.89) million people living with visual acuity loss, of whom 1.08 (95% uncertainty interval, 0.82-1.30) million people were living with blindness. Of this, 1.62 (95% uncertainty interval, 1.32-1.92) million persons with visual acuity loss are younger than 40 years, and 141 000 (95% uncertainty interval, 95 000-187 000) persons with blindness are younger than 40 years. Conclusions and Relevance This analysis of all available data with modern methods produced estimates substantially higher than those previously published.

Purpose Retinal vascular occlusion is a leading cause of profound irreversible visual loss, but the understanding of the disease is insufficient. We systematically investigated the age, gender, and laterality at the onset of retinal artery occlusion (RAO) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in the Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry. Design Retrospective registry cohort. Participants Patients with retinal vascular occlusion participating in the IRIS® Registry. Methods Patients who received a diagnosis of retinal vascular occlusion between 2013 and 2017 were included. Those with unspecified gender or laterality were excluded when conducting the relevant analyses. Patients were categorized into RAO, with subtypes transient retinal artery occlusion (TRAO), partial retinal artery occlusion (PRAO), branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO), and central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), and into RVO, with subtypes venous engorgement (VE), branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Age was evaluated as a categorical variable (5-year increments). We investigated the association of age, gender, and laterality with the onset frequency of retinal vascular occlusion subtypes. Main Outcome Measures The frequency of onset of RAO and RVO subtypes by age, gender and laterality. Results A total of 1 251 476 patients with retinal vascular occlusion were included, 23.8% of whom had RAO, whereas 76.2% had RVO. Of these, 1 248 656 and 798 089 patients were selected for analyses relevant to gender and laterality, respectively. The onset frequency of all subtypes increased with age. PRAO, BRAO, CRAO, and CRVO presented more frequently in men (53.5%, 51.3%, 52.6%, and 50.4%, respectively), whereas TRAO, VE, and BRVO presented more frequently in women (54.9%, 56.0%, and 54.5% respectively). All RAO subtypes and BRVO showed a right-eye onset preference (TRAO, 51.7%; PRAO, 54.4%; BRAO, 53.5%; CRAO, 53.4%; and BRVO, 51.0%), whereas VE and CRVO exhibited a left-eye onset preference (53.3% and 50.9%, respectively). Conclusions Although retinal vascular occlusion incidence increases with age regardless of subtypes, we found various subtype-specific disease-onset differences related to gender and, in particular, ocular laterality. These findings may improve understanding of the specific cause of retinal vascular occlusions of different subtypes and their relationships with structural and anatomic asymmetries of the vascular system.

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is a rare, but devastating, cause of vision loss in children, with most current publications limited to small case series. Using a large clinical registry allowed us to understand the most common causes of this disease and the visual outcomes.Retrospective analysis.Patients younger than 18 years in the Intelligent Research in Sight Registry diagnosed with CNV between 2013 and 2019.Cases were identified based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions, diagnosis codes for CNV or CNV-related etiology and Current Procedural Terminology treatment codes.Etiology of CNV, treatment patterns, and visual outcomes.Two thousand three hundred fifty-three eyes with pediatric CNV were identified. The most common identifiable causes of pediatric CNV were posterior uveitis or inflammatory chorioretinal disease (19.4%), myopia (18.4%), hereditary dystrophy (5.4%), chorioretinal scar (4.2%), choroidal rupture (3.5%), optic nerve drusen (3.2%), osteoma (1.9%), and solar retinopathy (0.2%). In 38.2% of eyes, CNV was idiopathic, and in 5.7% of eyes, multiple causes were coded. One thousand forty-one eyes (44.4%) underwent treatment. The mean age of mean age of patients whose eyes received treatment 13.6 ± 3.5 years compared with 12.4 ± 4.1 years for the untreated group (P0.001). In 88.9% of eyes, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections were administered, 7.9% of eyes received laser therapy, 0.3% of eyes received photodynamic therapy, and 2.9% of eyes received combination therapy. In the eyes receiving anti-VEGF agents, 68.4% required 3 injections or fewer (P0.0001). Eyes undergoing treatment exhibited worse baseline visual acuity (VA) than eyes that did not undergo treatment (0.62 ± 0.50 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] vs. 0.44 ± 0.50 logMAR; P0.0001). Visual acuity in the treatment group improved significantly from 0.62 ± 0.50 logMAR at baseline to 0.39 ± 0.43 logMAR at year 1 (P0.0001). Visual acuity in the untreated group improved significantly from 0.44 ± 0.50 logMAR at baseline to 0.34 ± 0.44 logMAR at year 1 (P0.001). Treated eyes showed a statistically significant higher odds of exhibiting a 2-line vision improvement or better compared with the untreated group at 12 months regardless of treatment type and after controlling for baseline VA (odds ratio, 2.4; P0.0001).CNV is a rare, sight-threatening condition in children, with the most common causes being idiopathic, inflammatory chorioretinal disease, and myopia. Eyes undergoing treatment tended to be in older patients and showed worse baseline VA compared with eyes that did not undergo treatment. Those that were treated experienced significant improvement in vision that was maintained in the long term.

Based on over 21 million intravitreal injections performed in the past 7 years, the utilization of bevacizumab has significantly decreased across all included payers. The percentage use has been lowest in patients with Medicare Fee for Service health insurance, compared with Medicare Advantage and other insurance. This might be due in part to the small margin paid when bevacizumab is used for intravitreal injections.

This study compared 1-year results for the composite treatment outcome from the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) randomized controlled trial (RCT) to those from an IRISRetrospective clinical study with comparison to an RCT.Subjects' eyes in the IRIS Registry received either a glaucoma drainage implant (tube) or underwent trabeculectomy after a previous trabeculectomy and/or cataract extraction and had data for 1-year follow-up analyses.Eyes were classified as failing if they had hypotony (intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤5 mm Hg) or inadequate IOP control (IOP21 mm Hg or not reduced at least 20% below baseline) on 2 consecutive follow-up visits after 3 months, a reoperation for glaucoma, or no light perception vision and as successful otherwise. Failure risk was compared by treatment, demographic, and clinical variables and was compared to analogous failure risks from the TVT RCT.The TVT IRIS Registry cohort included 419 eyes, 236 tube eyes (56.3%) and 183 trabeculectomy eyes (43.7%). In this cohort, there was no significant failure risk difference (12.3% for tube eyes and 16.4% for trabeculectomy eyes, P = 0.231). Comparing the studies, there was a significantly greater risk of failure in the TVT IRIS Registry tube eyes than in the TVT RCT tube eyes (3.8%; P.001). Reasons for treatment failure included reoperations for glaucoma (none in the TVT RCT at 1 year).Our results were different from those in the TVT RCT. Possible reasons include non-Baerveldt tubes, greater severity among tube eyes, and practice patterns that reflect real-world data, which are different than those in RCTs.