Search

Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAb), novel therapeutics for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), have been urgently researched from the start of the pandemic. The selection of the optimal mAb candidate and therapeutic dose were expedited using open-access in silico models. The maximally effective therapeutic mAb dose was determined through two approaches; both expanded on innovative, open-science initiatives. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model, incorporating physicochemical properties predictive of mAb clearance and tissue distribution, was used to estimate mAb exposure that maintained concentrations above 90% inhibitory concentration of in vitro neutralization in lung tissue for up to 4 weeks in 90% of patients. To achieve fastest viral clearance following onset of symptoms, a longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 viral dynamic model was applied to estimate viral clearance as a function of drug concentration and dose. The PBPK model-based approach suggested that a clinical dose between 175 and 500 mg of bamlanivimab would maintain target mAb concentrations in the lung tissue over 28 days in 90% of patients. The viral dynamic model suggested a 700 mg dose would achieve maximum viral elimination. Taken together, the first-in-human trial (NCT04411628) conservatively proceeded with a starting therapeutic dose of 700 mg and escalated to higher doses to evaluate the upper limit of safety and tolerability. Availability of open-access codes and application of novel in silico model-based approaches supported the selection of bamlanivimab and identified the lowest dose evaluated in this study that was expected to result in the maximum therapeutic effect before the first-in-human clinical trial.

Brexpiprazole is an oral antipsychotic agent indicated for use in patients with schizophrenia or as adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder. As obesity (body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 ) has the potential to affect drug pharmacokinetics and is a common comorbidity of both schizophrenia and major depressive disorder, it is important to understand changes in brexpiprazole disposition in this population. This study uses a whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to compare the pharmacokinetics of brexpiprazole in obese and normal-weight (body mass index 18-25 kg/m2 ) individuals known to be cytochrome P450 2D6 extensive metabolizers (EMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs). The physiologically based pharmacokinetic simulations demonstrated significant differences in the time to effective concentrations between obese and normal-weight individuals within metabolizer groups according to the label-recommended titration. Simulations using an alternative dosing strategy of 1 week of twice-daily dosing in obese EMs or 2 weeks of twice-daily dosing in obese poor metabolizers, followed by a return to once-daily dosing, yielded more consistent plasma concentrations between normal-weight and obese patients without exceeding the area under the plasma concentration-time curve observed in the normal-weight EMs. These alternative dosing strategies reduce the time to effective concentrations in obese patients and may improve clinical response to brexpiprazole.

Brexpiprazole is an oral antipsychotic agent indicated for use in patients with schizophrenia, or as adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder. As cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 contributes significantly to brexpiprazole metabolism, there is a label-recommended 50% reduction in dose among patients with the CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype. This study uses a whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to compare the pharmacokinetics of brexpiprazole in patients known to be extensive metabolizers (EMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs). A PBPK model was constructed, verified, and validated against brexpiprazole clinical data, and simulations of 500 subjects were performed to establish the median time to effective concentrations in EMs and PMs. The PBPK simulations captured brexpiprazole PK well and demonstrated significant differences in the time to effective concentrations between EMs and PMs according to the label-recommended titration. Additionally, these simulations suggest that CYP2D6 PMs consistently achieve lower minimum concentrations during the dosing interval than CYP2D6 EMs. Simulations using an alternative dosing strategy of twice-daily dosing (as opposed to once daily) in PMs during the first week of brexpiprazole dosing yielded more consistent plasma concentrations between EMs and PMs, without exceeding the area under the plasma concentration-time curve observed in the EMs. Taken together, the results of these PBPK simulations suggest that product labeling for brexpiprazole titration in CYP2D6 PMs likely overcompensates for the decreased clearance seen in this population. We propose an alternative dosing strategy that decreases the time to effective concentrations and recommend a reevaluation of steady-state PK in this population to potentially allow for higher daily doses in CYP2D6 PMs.

AIMS To optimise the dosing regimen of oseltamivir for immunocompromised (IC) paediatric patients (