Search

PURPOSE: The recently identified agonistic autoantibodies (AAb) to the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRHR) are a novel investigative and therapeutic target for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). In this study, we used a new cell-based fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) bioassay to analyze serum GnRHR-AAb activity and examine its relationship with testosterone and proinflammatory cytokines in patients with PCOS. METHODS: Serum samples from 33 PCOS patients, 39 non-PCOS ovulatory infertile controls and 30 normal controls were tested for GnRHR-AAb activity and proinflammatory cytokines in a FRET-based bioassay and multiplex bead-based immunoassay, respectively. Correlation was analyzed using the Spearman’s correlation test. RESULTS: Serum GnRHR-AAb activity was significantly higher in the PCOS patients than for the ovulatory infertile (p < 0.05) and normal (p < 0.01) controls. GnRHR-AAb were positive in 39% of PCOS patients, 10% of ovulatory infertile controls, and 0% of normal controls. PCOS IgG-induced GnRHR activation was specifically blocked by the GnRHR antagonist cetrorelix. Serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-2, interleukin-6, interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α were significantly increased in PCOS patients compared with ovulatory infertile and normal controls (p < 0.01). Correlation analysis demonstrated positive correlations of GnRHR-AAb activity with testosterone and proinflammatory cytokine levels in the PCOS group. CONCLUSION: Elevated GnRHR-AAb activity, as assessed by a new FRET assay, is associated with increased testosterone and proinflammatory cytokines in PCOS, suggesting autoimmune activation of GnRHR may contribute to the pathogenesis of this common disorder.

Objectives 1) To confirm the correlation of GnRH receptor (GnRHR) activating autoantibody (AAb) activity with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) diagnosis in large well defined cohorts; and 2) to evaluate suppression of AAb activity with GnRH antagonist medication in transfected GnRHR cells exposed to serum of PCOS patients. Design Cross-sectional matched case-control study. Setting University-based research facility. Patient(s) Sera from 200 patients with PCOS from the Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome II (PPCOS II) trial and from 200 race, parity-, age-, and body mass index (BMI)–matched ovulatory unexplained infertile control patients from the Assessment of Multiple Intrauterine Gestations from Ovarian Stimulation (AMIGOS) trial were obtained and used for this study. Intervention(s) GnRHR AAb activity was determined with the use of the GeneBlazer cell-based fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay with and without cetrorelix, a GnRH antagonist. Main Outcome Measure(s) 1) GnRHR AAb activity in PCOS patients compared with control subjects; and 2) effectiveness of GnRH antagonist in suppressing GnRHR AAb activity. Result(s) GnRHR AAb activity levels in the PCOS group were significantly higher than in the control group. With cetrorelix, GnRHR AAb activity was largely suppressed in the PCOS group but not in the control group. These differences remained significant after adjusting for within-pair differences in age, BMI, and antimullerian hormone (AMH) levels. Conclusion(s) We confirmed higher GnRHR AAb activity levels in the sera of a large cohort of PCOS patients compared with unexplained infertile control subjects. Addition of cetrorelix resulted in significant suppression of AAb activity levels in PCOS patients as a group whereas control subjects were unaffected. GnRHR AAb, along with patient age and AMH level, may provide a promising future diagnostic test for PCOS.

Purpose We have recently demonstrated that gonadotrophin-releasing hormone receptor-activating autoantibodies (GnRHR-AAb) are associated with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The aim of this study was to map the antigenic epitopes of GnRHR-AAb from PCOS patients, and develop retro-inverso peptide inhibitors that specifically target GnRHR-AAb. Methods Serum samples from ten GnRHR-AAb-positive PCOS patients and ten GnRHR-AAb-negative healthy controls were tested. Epitope mapping for GnRHR-AAb was performed using a set of 11 overlapping octapeptides spanning the second extracellular loop of GnRHR. Antibody-blocking effect of the designed retro-inverso peptide inhibitors was evaluated in a cell-based bioassay. Results Two peptide sequences, FSQCVTHC and HCSFSQWW, were found to react with all PCOS sera, but not with control sera. Two retro-inverso peptides that mimic the identified epitopes, d-CHTVCQSF and d-WWQSFSCH, significantly inhibited PCOS serum IgG-induced GnRHR activation. One of these two peptide inhibitors, d-CHTVCQSF, largely suppressed autoantibody-induced GnRHR activation, suggesting that the epitope sequence FSQCVTHC may be a major functional target of GnRHR-AAb. Conclusion We have identified a dominant functional epitope for GnRHR-AAb associated with PCOS, and demonstrated effective blocking of GnRHR-AAb activity with epitope-mimicking retro-inverso peptide inhibitors. These proteolytically stable decoy peptides may have important therapeutic implications in subjects who harbor these autoantibodies.

Objective Is polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) associated with activating autoantibodies (AAb) to the second extracellular loop (ECL2) of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRHR)? Design and Methods We retrospectively screened sera from 40 patients with PCOS and 14 normal controls (NCs) with regular menses using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the presence of GnRHR-ECL2-AAb. We obtained similar data from 40 non-PCOS ovulatory but infertile patients as a control group (OIC) of interest. We analyzed GnRHR-ECL2-AAb activity in purified immunoglobulin (Ig)G using a cell-based GnRHR bioassay. Results The mean ELISA value in the PCOS group was markedly higher than the NC (P = .000036) and the OIC (P = .0028) groups. IgG from a sample of 5 PCOS subjects, in contrast to a sample of 5 OIC subjects, demonstrated a dose-dependent increase in GnRHR-stimulating activity qualitatively similar to the acute action of the natural ligand GnRH and the synthetic agonist leuprolide. The GnRHR antagonist cetrorelix significantly suppressed (P Conclusions GnRHR-ECL2-AAb are significantly elevated in patients with PCOS compared with NCs. Their presence raises important etiological, diagnostic, and therapeutic implications.

BACKGROUND: No research exists on American Indian pregnancy rates following infertility treatment. Most racial/ethnic fertility research has focused on pregnancy following in vitro fertilization, with only rare studies looking at intrauterine insemination (IUI). The objective of our study was to compare fecundability following IUI by race/ethnicity, with a special focus on American Indians. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of subjects undergoing IUI July 2007—May 2012 at a university-based infertility clinic. The primary outcome was positive pregnancy test, with a secondary outcome of ongoing pregnancy/delivery (OP/D). We calculated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using cluster-weighted generalized estimating equations method to estimate modified Poisson regression models with robust standard errors to account for multiple IUI cycles in the same patient. RESULTS: A total of 663 females (median age 32) undergoing 2007 IUI cycles were included in the analysis. Pregnancy rates overall were 15% per IUI cycle. OP/D rates overall were 10% per IUI cycle. The American Indian patients had significantly lower pregnancy (RR 0.34, 95%CI 0.16–0.72) and OP/D rates (RR 0.33, 95%CI 0.12–0.87) compared to non-Hispanic whites when patient and cycle characteristics were controlled. Pregnancy and OP/D rates for blacks, Asians and Hispanics did not differ from non-Hispanic whites. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding of lower IUI treatment success among American Indian patients is novel, as no published studies of assisted reproductive technology or other fertility treatments have examined this subgroup separately. Further investigation of patient and clinical factors that may mediate racial/ethnic disparities in fertility treatment outcomes is warranted.

We sought to examine current use of, and indications for, progesterone supplementation in the luteal phase of non-in vitro fertilization (non-IVF) infertility treatments among Obstetrician Gynaecologists (OB/GYN) compared to Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (REI) Subspecialists. Using a web-based survey, the practices of U.S. REI and OB/GYN physicians practicing infertility from 2014-2016 were assessed. The main outcome measures were frequency of use and indications for progesterone supplementation for luteal-phase support in non-IVF infertility treatments. Comparisons between physicians groups by indication and treatment type were performed using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Sixty-four REIs and 49 OB/GYNs completed the survey. One hundred per cent of REI and 73.5% of OB/GYN respondents prescribed progesterone for luteal-phase support as part of non-IVF infertility treatment. The majority of all respondents utilized progesterone supplementation for one or more indications in clomiphene citrate and letrozole treatment cycles. Treatment type was the primary decisional factor reported by REIs (56%) for prescription of luteal-phase progesterone support. Serum progesterone level was reported as the leading decisional factor for luteal-phase supplementation (66.7%) by OB/GYNs. Luteal-phase progesterone supplementation in non-IVF treatments appears common for both physician groups in the United States in spite of lack of evidence supporting its effectiveness.

"Recent studies have revealed evidence that poorly controlled cholesterol, triglycerides, and their metabolites during pregnancy may be associated with cardiometabolic dysfunction and have significant detrimental fetal and maternal vascular consequences. Cardiometabolic dysfunction during pregnancy may not only contribute to long-term effects of the mother and child's vascular health but also potentially create cardiovascular risk for generational offspring. This article provides updates on this rapidly expanding and multifaceted topic and reviews new insight regarding why recognition of this disordered maternal cholesterol and triglyceride metabolism is likely to have long-term effect on the increasing atherosclerotic burden of the burgeoning population."

Understanding opportunities to reduce dyslipidemia before, during, and after pregnancy has major implications for cardiovascular disease risk prevention for the entire population. The best time to screen for dyslipidemia is before pregnancy or in the early antenatal period. The differential diagnosis of hypertriglyceridemia in pregnancy is the same as in nonpregnant women except that clinical lipidologists need to be aware of the potential obstetric complications associated with hypertriglyceridemia. Dyslipidemia discovered during pregnancy should be treated with diet and exercise intervention, as well as glycemic control if indicated. A complete lipid profile assessment during each trimester of pregnancy is recommended.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the number one cause of death for women in the United States. Although typically a time of low risk, the reproductive years of a woman’s lifetime offer an optimal time to address and prevent future cardiovascular disease by reducing risk factors such as dyslipidemia and early atherosclerosis. Although it is widely known that pregnancy is a state of increased insulin resistance, there are no current reference standards to define normal lipid parameters during pregnancy. Recent animal studies have reported findings that suggest uncontrolled dyslipidemia during pregnancy may potentially predispose or increase the inherent CVD risk for their offspring. Furthermore, women with uncontrolled diabetes, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and specific metabolic disorders may all be at yet further increased lifetime risk of dyslipidemia, thereby affecting future health of the mother, her child and future generations. Despite the incomplete understanding of the pathophysiology relating these diseases with potential development of CVD, both in the mother and child, the importance of awareness and improvement in overall health remains paramount.

Endometriosis, characterized by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma in extrauterine locations, is a significant cause of pelvic pain and infertility, as well as a major health care burden. Although Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatments are available, the use of "off-label" medications for endometriosis is widespread. In this review, we provide an overview of the current FDA-approved treatments, followed by a detailed review of the major "off-label" treatments being used in the United States and worldwide, including efficacy, side effects, drug interactions, contraindications, and anomaly risks.