1. Perceived Importance of the Benefits and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Best-Worst Scaling Study
- Author
-
Pluymen, Linda P. M., Yebyo, Henock G., Stegeman, Inge, Fransen, Mirjam P., Dekker, Evelien, Brabers, Anne E. M., Leeflang, Mariska M. G., Epidemiology and Data Science, Public and occupational health, APH - Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, APH - Quality of Care, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, CCA - Imaging and biomarkers, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, APH - Methodology, and APH - Personalized Medicine
- Subjects
discrete choice ,Health Policy ,benefit-harm balance ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,elucidating preferences ,best-worst scaling ,early detection - Abstract
Objectives: To elicit the relative importance of the benefits and harms of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among potential screening participants in the Dutch population. Methods: In a consensus meeting with 11 experts, risk reduction of CRC and CRC deaths (benefits) and complications from colonoscopy, stress of receiving positive fecal immunological test (FIT) results, as well as false-positive and false-negative FIT results (harms) were selected as determinant end points to consider during decision making. We conducted an online best-worst scaling survey among adults aged 55 to 75 years from the Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel of The Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research to elicit preference values for these outcomes. The preference values were estimated using conditional logit regression. Results: Of 265 participants, 234 (89%) had ever participated in CRC screening. Compared with the stress of receiving a positive FIT result, the outcome perceived most important was the risk of CRC death (odds ratio [OR] 4.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9-5.1), followed by risk of CRC (OR 4.1; 95% CI 3.6-4.7), a false-negative FIT result (OR 3.1; 95% CI 2.7-3.5), colonoscopy complications (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4-1.8), and a false-positive FIT result (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.3-1.6). The magnitude of these differences in perceived importance varied according to age, educational level, ethnic background, and whether the individual had previously participated in CRC screening. Conclusion: Dutch men and women eligible for FIT-based CRC screening perceive the benefits of screening to be more important than the harms.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF