Search

Background and purposeImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies that enhance the immune response against cancer cells. ICIs are generally well tolerated, although endocrine immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are common. We investigated the risk factors for thyroid irAEs in patients treated with ICIs. Moreover, we evaluated the clinical outcome of subjects who became hypothyroid compared to euthyroid patients.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed a series of 195 consecutively subjects treated with ICIs for metastatic tumors at the University of Naples “Federico II” between January 2014 and March 2020. Only subjects tested for thyroid function before and during the treatment with ICIs were included.ResultsIn the 96 patients treated with ICIs who were included [66 males, median age: 62 years (27–87)], thyroid irAEs occurred in 36 (37.5%), 16 (16.7%) a transient thyrotoxicosis, and 20 (20.8%) an hypothyroidism (in nine subjects hypothyroidism was preceded by a transient thyrotoxicosis). Only baseline TSH levels above 1.67 mIU/L and positive anti-thyroid antibodies (Ab-T) were associated with a higher risk of hypothyroidism. Patients with hypothyroidism during ICI treatment showed an improved 2-year PFS (HR = 0.82 CI 0.47–1.43;p = 0.0132) and OS (HR = 0.38 CI 95% 0.17–0.80;p = 0.011) compared to euthyroid patients.ConclusionsBaseline TSH levels above 1.67 mIU/L and presence of Ab-T are risk factors for the development of thyroid irAEs. Patients affected by thyroid irAEs showed a longer survival than patients who remained euthyroid.

BACKGROUND: The FAST is a 2 × 2 factorial trial addressing two questions: (1) the role of replacing cisplatin (P) with a non-platinum agent, vinorelbine (N), and (2) the role of adding a third agent, ifosfamide (I), in a doublet based on gemcitabine (G). METHODS: A total of 433 stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were randomised to one of four arms: gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP), gemcitabine-vinorelbine, gemcitabine-ifosfamide- cisplatin or gemcitabine-ifosfamide-vinorelbine. Two comparisons were performed: N- vs P-containing regimens and I-triplets vs non-I doublets. RESULTS: For N- vs P-containing regimens, adjusted overall survival was 9.7 vs 11.3 months (P=0.044), progression-free survival was 4.9 vs 6.4 months (P=0.020) and response rate was 24% vs 31% (P=0.124), respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed between doublets and triplets. Grade 3-4 haematological toxicity was significantly more frequent in P-containing therapy; grade 3-4 leucopenia was significantly more common in triplets. Concerning non-haematological toxicity, grade 3-4 nausea-vomiting was significantly increased in P-containing regimens. CONCLUSIONS: This trial provides evidence of a slight survival superiority of GP-containing regimens over platinum-free N-containing chemotherapy. This trial also confirms that the addition of a third chemotherapy agent (I) to a standard G-based doublet does not improve treatment outcome. © 2012 Cancer Research UK. All rights reserved.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether two commonly used newer platinum-based regimens offer any advantage over vinorelbine-cisplatin (reference regimen) in response rate for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to receive gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 2 every 21 days (GC arm), or paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion) then carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 6 mg/mL·min), both on day 1 every 21 days (PCb arm), or vinorelbine 25 mg/m2/wk for 12 weeks then every other week plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 every 28 days (VC arm). RESULTS: Six hundred twelve patients were randomized to treatment (205 GC, 204 PCb, and 203 VC). Overall response rates for the GC (30%) and PCb (32%) arms were not significantly different from that of the VC arm (30%). There were no differences in overall survival, time to disease progression, or time to treatment failure. Median survival for the GC, PCb, and VC groups was 9.8, 9.9, and 9.5 months, respectively. Neutropenia was significantly higher on the VC arm (GC 17% or PCb 35% v VC 43% of cycles, P < .001), as was thrombocytopenia on the GC arm (GC 16% v VC 0.1% of cycles, P < .001). Alopecia and peripheral neurotoxicity were most common on the PCb arm, as was nausea/vomiting on the VC arm (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Efficacy end points were not significantly different between experimental and reference arms, although toxicities showed differences. These findings suggest that chemotherapy in NSCLC has reached a therapeutic plateau.