1. Experiences of pregnant women with genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing in a national screening program
- Author
-
van der Meij, Karuna R.M., van de Pol, Qiu Ying F., Bekker, Mireille N., Martin, Linda, Gitsels-van der Wal, Janneke, van Vliet-Lachotzki, Elsbeth H., Weiss, Janneke M., Galjaard, Robert Jan H., Sistermans, Erik A., Macville, Merryn V.E., Henneman, Lidewij, RS: GROW - R4 - Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine, MUMC+: DA KG Lab Specialisten (9), Clinical Genetics, Human genetics, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D), and Midwifery Science
- Subjects
Risk ,All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center ,Neurodevelopmental disorders Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience [Radboudumc 7] ,Informed decision-making ,Genetics ,Downs-syndrome ,Anxiety ,Genetics (clinical) ,Nipt - Abstract
Contains fulltext : 292727.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Pregnant women's perspectives should be included in the dialogue surrounding the expanding offers of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), especially now that technological possibilities are rapidly increasing. This study evaluated women's experiences with the offer of genome-wide (GW) first-tier NIPT in a national screening program. A nationwide pre-and post-test questionnaire was completed by 473 pregnant women choosing between targeted NIPT (trisomies 21, 18 and 13 only) and GW-NIPT (also other findings) within the Dutch TRIDENT-2 study. Measures included satisfaction, reasons for or against choosing GW-NIPT, anxiety, and opinion on the future scope of NIPT. Most respondents (90.4%) were glad to have been offered the choice between GW-NIPT and targeted NIPT; 76.5% chose GW-NIPT. Main reasons to choose GW-NIPT were 'wanting as much information as possible regarding the child's health' (38.6%) and 'to be prepared for everything' (23.8%). Main reasons to choose targeted NIPT were 'avoiding uncertain results/outcomes' (33.7%) and 'not wanting to unnecessarily worry' (32.6%). Nearly all respondents received a low-risk NIPT result (98.7%). No differences were found in anxiety between women choosing GW-NIPT and targeted NIPT. Most respondents were favorable toward future prenatal screening for a range of conditions, including life-threatening disorders, mental disabilities, disorders treatable in pregnancy and severe physical disabilities, regardless of their choice for GW-NIPT or targeted NIPT. In conclusion, women who chose first-tier NIPT were satisfied with the choice between GW-NIPT and targeted NIPT, and most women were favorable toward a broader future screening offer. Our results contribute to the debate concerning the expansion of NIPT.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF