Search

Additional file 1. Comparison of patient characteristics, diagnostic/examination factors, and pathology factors between the two patient groups delineated based on mammography (MG)-guided procedures for diagnosing DCIS.

We introduce a comprehensive screening platform for the COVID-19 (a.k.a., SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia. The proposed AI-based system works on chest x-ray (CXR) images to predict whether a patient is infected with the COVID-19 disease. Although the recent international joint effort on making the availability of all sorts of open data, the public collection of CXR images is still relatively small for reliably training a deep neural network (DNN) to carry out COVID-19 prediction. To better address such inefficiency, we design a cascaded learning strategy to improve both the sensitivity and the specificity of the resulting DNN classification model. Our approach leverages a large CXR image dataset of non-COVID-19 pneumonia to generalize the original well-trained classification model via a cascaded learning scheme. The resulting screening system is shown to achieve good classification performance on the expanded dataset, including those newly added COVID-19 CXR images., 14 pages, 6 figures

During the first two decades of the 21st century, there have been three coronavirus infection outbreaks raising global health concerns by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and the SARS-CoV-2. Although the reported imaging findings of coronavirus infection are variable and non-specific, the most common initial chest radiograph (CXR) and CT findings are ground-glass opacities and consolidation with peripheral predominance and eventually spread to involve both lungs as the disease progresses. These findings can be explained by the immune pathogenesis of coronavirus infection causing diffuse alveolar damage. Although it is insensitive in mild or early coronavirus infection, the CXR remains as the first-line and the most commonly used imaging modality. That is because it is rapid and easily accessible and helpful for monitoring patient progress during treatment. CT is more sensitive to detect early parenchymal lung abnormalities and disease progression, and can provide an alternative diagnosis. In this pictorial review, various coronavirus infection cases are presented to provide imaging spectrums of coronavirus infection and present differences in imaging among them or from other viral infections, and to discuss the role of imaging in viral infection outbreaks.

Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) has been widely available since 2004. After that, the diagnostic accuracy of CCTA has been extensively validated with invasive coronary angiography for detection of coronary arterial stenosis. In this paper, we reviewed the updated evidence of the role of CCTA in both scenarios including acute chest pain and screening in asymptomatic adults. Several large-scale studies have been conducted to evaluate the diagnostic value of CCTA in the context of acute chest pain patients. CCTA could play a role in delivering more efficient care. For risk stratification of asymptomatic patients using CCTA, latest studies have revealed incremental benefits. Future studies evaluating the totality of plaque characteristics may be useful for determining the role of noncalcified plaque for risk stratification in asymptomatic individuals.Acute chest pain • Computed tomography • Coronary artery disease • Health screening • Stable angina.

Multiple complex venous and intracardiac anomalies are frequently seen in patients with right atrial isomerism, and complete anatomic information may not always be obtained from combined echocardiography and angiography. Twenty patients with right atrial isomerism were prospectively studied with use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); satisfactory imaging was obtained in 18 patients, aged 6 days to 12 years (median 3 months). All patients had undergone echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, and angiocardiography. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of MRI in the evaluation of venoatrial connections, atrial morphology, bronchial situs, and additional anomalies. Bilateral superior venae cavae were documented in 12 patients and anomalous hepatic venous drainage in 11. The pulmonary venous system was imaged in all 18 patients, of whom 12 had total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: 9 supracardiac, 2 infracardiac, and 1 mixed type. Some obstruction to pulmonary venous return was present in 9 of the 12 patients, and the site of obstruction was demonstrated by MRI in 6. Bilateral morphologic right atrial appendages were imaged in 7 patients. Bilateral morphologic right bronchi were identified in 17 patients, asplenia was confirmed in 17 of 18 patients by the absence of splenic tissue on imaging, and hiatal hernia was imaged in 4. Compared with angiography and echocardiography, MRI more clearly defined the pulmonary venous connections in 10 patients with pulmonary venous obstruction. Anomalous hepatic venous connections were better defined by MRI in 2. Therefore, MRI provided valuable supplementary information on the cardiovascular and visceral anomalies in these patients.

Videofluoroscopy has long been viewed as the "gold standard" of swallowing examination for the comprehensive information it provides. However, it is not very efficient and accessible in some practical situations. In this study, we tried to use a modified technique of fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (FEES) in evaluating dysphagic patients. For each examination, a spoonful of pudding and dyed water were fed in sequence three times. The pharyngeal swallowing events were observed with fiberscope panoramically and videotaped. Twenty-eight chronic dysphagic patients underwent both videofluoroscopy and FEES in 2 weeks. Comparison of the results revealed that disagreements in premature oral leakage to the pharynx, pharyngeal stasis, laryngeal penetration, aspiration, effective cough reflex, and velopharyngeal incompetence were 39.3%, 10.7%, 14.3%, 14.3%, 39.3%, and 32.1%, respectively. FEES was found to be more sensitive in detecting these risky features of swallowing, except with respect to premature leakage. Possible causes of the discrepant results are discussed, and the limitation of videofluoroscopy in practical usage is discussed. FEES is conclusively a safer, more efficient, and sensitive method than videofluoroscopy in evaluating swallowing safety.