1. Learners’ motivational response to the Science, PE, & Me! curriculum: A situational interest perspective
- Author
-
Senlin Chen, Ang Chen, Haichun Sun, Xihe Zhu, and Catherine D. Ennis
- Subjects
Learner motivation ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Context (language use) ,Elementary physical education ,Constructivist learning theory ,Physical education ,03 medical and health sciences ,lcsh:GV557-1198.995 ,0302 clinical medicine ,Mathematics education ,ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION ,Humans ,Learning ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Abbreviations as Topic ,lcsh:Sports medicine ,Students ,Curriculum ,Reference group ,lcsh:Sports ,Motivation ,Physical Education and Training ,Schools ,Perspective (graphical) ,Novelty ,Structural mean modeling ,030229 sport sciences ,United States ,Situational interest ,Original Article ,Curriculum intervention ,Psychology ,lcsh:RC1200-1245 - Abstract
Highlights • This was one of the few large-scale curriculum intervention studies (n = 30 schools), that examined the effect of an elementary school constructivist physical education curriculum (i.e., the Science, PE & Me curriculum) on learners’ situational interest. • Based on the structured mean modeling analysis, the students in the intervention group showed statistically significantly higher perceptions of enjoyment, challenge, exploration, novelty, and attention demand about their physical education experiences than the students in the comparison group. • The findings suggest that the Science, PE & Me curriculum created a more interesting and motivational educational context than the traditional multi-activity sports-based physical education., Background The Science, PE, & Me! (SPEM) curriculum is a concept-based physical education curriculum that offers students coherent educational experiences for constructing health-related fitness knowledge through movement experiences. The purpose of this study was to evaluate students’ motivational response to the SPEM curriculum from the situational interest perspective. Methods The study used a cluster randomized controlled design in which 30 elementary schools in one of the largest metropolitan areas in the eastern United States were randomly assigned to an experimental or comparison condition. Although all students in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grades in the targeted schools were eligible to participate in the study, a random sample of students from the experimental (n = 1749; 15 schools) and comparison groups (n = 1985; 15 schools) provided data. Students’ motivational response to the SPEM curriculum or comparison curriculum was measured using the previously validated Situational Interest Scale–Elementary. Data were analyzed using structural mean modeling. Results The results demonstrated that the experimental group (as reference group) showed significantly higher enjoyment (z = –2.01), challenge (z = –6.54), exploration (z = –12.195), novelty (z = –8.80), and attention demand (z = –7.90) than the comparison group. Conclusion The findings indicate that the SPEM curriculum created a more situationally interesting context for learning than the comparison physical education curriculum., Graphic Abstract Image, graphical abstract
- Published
- 2019