7 results on '"Boot CRL"'
Search Results
2. Workplace Interventions to Prevent Disability from Both the Scientific and Practice Perspectives
- Author
-
Williams-Whitt, Kelly, Bultmann, Ute, Amick, Benjamin, III, Munir, Fehmidah, Tveito, Torill H., Anema, Johannes R., Boot, CRL, Public Health Research (PHR), Public and occupational health, and EMGO - Musculoskeletal health
- Subjects
Cost effectiveness ,Psychological intervention ,Scientific literature ,SICKNESS ABSENCE ,Article ,COST-EFFECTIVENESS ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Occupational Therapy ,RETURN-TO-WORK ,Humans ,Medicine ,MULTIDISCIPLINARY REHABILITATION ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Workplace ,Disability prevention ,Workplace interventions ,Occupational Health ,Research priorities ,Medical education ,business.industry ,Management science ,Publications ,Rehabilitation ,Stakeholder ,Grey literature ,RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL ,Occupational Injuries ,030210 environmental & occupational health ,Participatory ergonomics ,NECK PAIN ,Integrated care ,ORGANIZATIONAL INTERVENTIONS ,INTEGRATED CARE ,Health psychology ,Employer practices ,PARTICIPATORY ERGONOMICS ,Periodicals as Topic ,business ,LOW-BACK-PAIN - Abstract
Purpose The significant individual and societal burden of work disability could be reduced if supportive workplace strategies could be added to evidence-based clinical treatment and rehabilitation to improve return-to-work (RTW) and other disability outcomes. The goal of this article is to summarize existing research on workplace interventions to prevent disability, relate these to employer disability management practices, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration that ultimately led to an invited 3-day conference, Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability, held October 14–16, 2015, in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with an expert panel with direct employer experience. Results Evidence from randomized trials and other research designs has shown general support for job modification, RTW coordination, and organizational support, but evidence is still lacking for interventions at a more granular level. Grey literature reports focused mainly on job re-design and work organization. Panel feedback focused on organizational readiness and the beliefs and values of senior managers as critical factors in facilitating changes to disability management practices. While the scientific literature is focused on facilitating improved coping and reducing discomforts for individual workers, the employer-directed grey literature is focused on making group-level changes to policies and procedures. Conclusions Future research might better target employer practices by tying interventions to positive workplace influences and determinants, by developing more participatory interventions and research designs, and by designing interventions that address factors of organizational change. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10926-016-9664-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
- Published
- 2016
3. Employer Policies and Practices to Manage and Prevent Disability: Foreword to the Special Issue
- Author
-
Shaw, William S., Main, Chris J., Pransky, Glenn, Nicholas, Michael K., Anema, Johannes R., Linton, Steven J., Boot, CRL, Public and occupational health, and EMGO - Musculoskeletal health
- Subjects
030506 rehabilitation ,Disability management ,Employer ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Occupational Therapy ,Occupational rehabilitation ,Medicine ,Relevance (law) ,Disability prevention ,Research priorities ,Medical education ,Disability ,business.industry ,Rehabilitation ,030210 environmental & occupational health ,Management ,Health psychology ,Intervention (law) ,Work (electrical) ,Aging in the American workforce ,Conceptual framework ,0305 other medical science ,business ,Working group - Abstract
Purpose Employer policies and practices have been shown to impact workplace disability, but research in this area has waned in recent years despite an aging workforce, a growing prevalence of chronic health conditions, and a larger proportion of working-age adults on permanent work disability in many jurisdictions. The purpose of this article is to describe the background rationale and methodology for an invited conference designed to improve research of employer strategies to curtail work disability. Methods A multidisciplinary team of 26 international researchers with published research in employer-based disability management or related fields were invited to attend a 3-day conference in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The overall goal was to review the status of current research of workplace disability management and prevention, examine its relevance for employer decision-making, compare conceptual frameworks or theoretical perspectives, and recommend future research directions. Working groups were organized and draft manuscripts were prepared in advance. Conference activities included working group presentations and critiques, discussions with a panel of industry consultants and advisors, group interaction and debate, generation of final recommendations, and manuscript revision. Results/Conclusion Six principal domains were established with respect to future research: (a) further elucidation of the key workplace factors that buffer the disabling effects of injury and illness; (b) more innovative and feasible options for workplace intervention; (c) measurement of workplace-relevant disability outcomes; (d) a stronger theoretical framework for understanding the factors behind employer uptake and implementation; (e) a focus on special clinical populations and occupations where disability risk is most troubling; and (f) better representation of workers and employers that reflect the diverse and changing nature of work. Final comments and recommendations of the working groups are presented in the following six articles in this special issue of the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. Conference attendees recommended changes in methodology, collaboration strategies, and theoretical perspectives to improve the practical and scientific impact of future research of employer practices. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10926-016-9658-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
- Published
- 2016
4. Implementation Science and Employer Disability Practices: Embedding Implementation Factors in Research Designs
- Author
-
Main, Chris J., Nicholas, Michael K., Shaw, William S., Tetrick, Lois E., Ehrhart, Mark G., Pransky, Glenn, Boot, CRL, Public and occupational health, and EMGO - Quality of care
- Subjects
Research design ,Implementation factors ,Process (engineering) ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Psychological intervention ,Organizational culture ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,Presentation ,0302 clinical medicine ,Occupational Therapy ,0502 economics and business ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Disability prevention ,Workplace interventions ,media_common ,Research priorities ,business.industry ,Management science ,05 social sciences ,Rehabilitation ,Grey literature ,Public relations ,R1 ,Health psychology ,Conceptual framework ,business ,050203 business & management - Abstract
Purpose For work disability research to have an impact on employer policies and practices it is important for such research to acknowledge and incorporate relevant aspects of the workplace. The goal of this article is to summarize recent theoretical and methodological advances in the field of Implementation Science, relate these to research of employer disability management practices, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration culminating in an invited 3-day conference, “Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability”, held October 14–16, 2015, in Hopkinton, MA, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with a special panel of knowledge experts with direct employer experience. Results A 4-phase implementation model including both outer and inner contexts was adopted as the most appropriate conceptual framework, and aligned well with the set of process evaluation factors described in both the work disability prevention literature and the grey literature. Innovative interventions involving disability risk screening and psychologically-based interventions have been slow to gain traction among employers and insurers. Research recommendations to address this are : (1) to assess organizational culture and readiness for change in addition to individual factors; (2) to conduct process evaluations alongside controlled trials; (3) to analyze decision-making factors among stakeholders; and (4 ) to solicit input from employers and insurers during early phases of study design. Conclusions Future research interventions involving workplace support and involvement to prevent disability may be more feasible for implementation if organizational decision-making factors are imbedded in research designs and interventions are developed to take account of these influences.
- Published
- 2016
5. New Business Structures Creating Organizational Opportunities and Challenges for Work Disability Prevention
- Author
-
Ekberg, Kerstin, Pransky, Glenn S., Besen, Elyssa, Fassier, Jean-Baptise, Feuerstein, Michael, Munir, Fehmidah, Blanck, Peter, Boot, CRL, Public and occupational health, and EMGO - Quality of care
- Subjects
Employment ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Alternate work arrangements ,Article ,Employers ,03 medical and health sciences ,Presentation ,Globalization ,Social support ,0302 clinical medicine ,Occupational Therapy ,Order (exchange) ,Health Sciences ,Humans ,Medicine ,Disabled Persons ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Workplace ,Occupational Health ,Research priorities ,media_common ,Disability ,business.industry ,Rehabilitation ,Rehabilitation, Vocational ,Grey literature ,Public relations ,Hälsovetenskaper ,030210 environmental & occupational health ,Management ,Health psychology ,Work (electrical) ,Feeling ,business - Abstract
Purpose Flexible work arrangements are growing in order to develop resource-efficient production and because of advanced technologies, new societal values, changing demographics, and globalization. The article aims to illustrate the emerging challenges and opportunities for work disability prevention efforts among workers in alternate work arrangements. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration that ultimately led to an invited 3-day conference, "Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability," held October 14-16, 2015, in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a roundtable discussion with experts having direct employer experience. Results Both worker and employer perspectives were considered, and four common alternate work arrangements were identified: (a) temporary and contingent employment; (b) small workplaces; (c) virtual work/telework; and (d) lone workers. There was sparse available research of return-to-work (RTW) and workplace disability management strategies with regard to alternate work patterns. Limited research findings and a review of the grey literature suggested that regulations and guidelines concerning disabled workers are often ambiguous, leading to unsatisfactory protection. At the workplace level, there was a lack of research evidence on how flexible work arrangements could be handled or leveraged to support RTW and prevent disability. Potential negative consequences of this lack of organizational guidance and information are higher costs for employers and insurers and feelings of job insecurity, lack of social support and integration, or work intensification for disabled workers. Conclusions Future studies of RTW and workplace disability prevention strategies should be designed to reflect the multiple work patterns that currently exist across many working populations, and in particular, flexible work arrangements should be explored in more detail as a possible mechanism for preventing disability. Labor laws and policies need to be developed to fit flexible work arrangements.
- Published
- 2016
6. Gewoon digitaal
- Author
-
Adams, SA, Boot, CRL, Steyaert, J., Haan, J. de, and Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management
- Published
- 2007
7. Sustaining Work Participation Across the Life Course
- Author
-
Pransky, Glenn S., Fassier, Jean-Baptise, Besen, Elyssa, Blanck, Peter, Ekberg, Kerstin, Feuerstein, Michael, Munir, Fehmidah, Boot, CRL, Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Unité Mixte de Recherche Epidémiologique et de Surveillance Transport Travail Environnement (UMRESTTE UMR_T9405), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Université Gustave Eiffel, Burton Blatt Institute, Syracuse University, Linköping University, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Public and occupational health, and EMGO - Quality of care
- Subjects
EPIDEMIOLOGIE ,medicine.medical_treatment ,CHRONIC HEALTH CONDITIONS ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Occupational Therapy ,SANTE ,medicine ,EMPLOYMENT ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Emotional exhaustion ,RETURN TO WORK ,Medical education ,Rehabilitation ,Management science ,Klinisk medicin ,EMPLOYER PRACTICES ,HUMANS ,Grey literature ,Mental illness ,medicine.disease ,030210 environmental & occupational health ,Mental health ,CANCER ,3. Good health ,Health psychology ,Aging in the American workforce ,MENTAL HEALTH ,8. Economic growth ,Life course approach ,CHRONIC DISEASE ,[SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie ,WORKPLACE ,Clinical Medicine ,Psychology - Abstract
Introduction Many disability prevention strategies are focused on acute injuries and brief illness episodes, but there will be growing challenges for employers to manage circumstances of recurrent, chronic, or fluctuating symptoms in an aging workforce. The goal of this article is to summarize existing peer-review research in this area, compare this with employer discourse in the grey literature, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long sponsored collaboration that ultimately led to an invited 3-day conference, "Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability", held October 14-16, 2015, in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the scientific and industry literature, group discussion to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, and feedback from peer researchers and a special panel of experts with employer experience. Results Cancer and mental illness were chosen as examples of chronic or recurring conditions that might challenge conventional workplace return-to-work practices. Workplace problems identified in the literature included fatigue, emotional exhaustion, poor supervisor and co-worker support, stigma, discrimination, and difficulties finding appropriate accommodations. Workplace intervention research is generally lacking, but there is preliminary support for improving workplace self-management strategies, collaborative problem-solving, and providing checklists and other tools for job accommodation, ideas echoed in the literature directed toward employers. Research might be improved by following workers from an earlier stage of developing workplace concerns. Conclusions Future research of work disability should focus on earlier identification of at-risk workers with chronic conditions, the use of more innovative and flexible accommodation strategies matched to specific functional losses, stronger integration of the workplace into on-going rehabilitation efforts, and a better understanding of stigma and other social factors at work.
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.