Search

Total body irradiation (TBI) at a dose of 12 Gy combined with cyclophosphamide (CyTBI12Gy) is one of the standard myeloablative regimens for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). In clinical practice, cyclophosphamide may be substituted with fludarabine (FluTBI12Gy) to reduce toxicity. We retrospectively compared outcomes of CyTBI12Gy with FluTBI12Gy for patients with AML treated in complete remission (CR) with allo-HCT from either a matched sibling or unrelated donor. Of 1684 adults who met inclusion criteria, 109 patients in each group were included in a matched-pair analysis. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 25% in the FluTBI12Gy compared to 28% in the CyTBI12Gy group (p =.44) while non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 17% versus 19%, (p =.89) respectively. The rates of leukemia-free survival and overall survival were 65% versus 54% (p =.28) and 70% versus 60.5% (p =.17). Cumulative incidence of grade 2–4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was significantly lower for FluTBI12Gy than CyTBI12Gy (16% vs. 34%, p =.005), while the incidences of grade 3–4 acute GVHD and chronic GVHD did not differ significantly. The probability of GVHD and relapse-free survival was 49% in the FluTBI12Gy and 41% in the CyTBI12Gy group (p =.17). We conclude that for patients with AML treated with allo-HCT in CR, cyclophosphamide may be substituted with fludarabine in a regimen based on TBI at a dose of 12 Gy without negative impact on the efficacy. FluTBI12Gy is associated with reduced risk of grade 2–4 acute GVHD and encouraging survival rates.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents an example of a highly complex and costly medical procedure with major applications in hematology and oncology. It is associated with life-threatening complications and, consequently, increased demands on healthcare resources. Although improving quality is an integral component of healthcare strategic planning, drivers of quality may be variable, and there is logical debate as to what drives quality in HSCT. Moreover, HSCT programs differ in structure and availability of resources, which drive the type of transplantations provided and determine what is affordable and/or economically feasible. The complexity of HSCT procedures with involvement of different stakeholders necessitates not only regulatory frameworks, but also robust quality systems to ensure consistent standards, demonstrate transparency for regulators, and define what quality means within the HSCT program. In an era of escalating healthcare complexity and heightened fiscal responsibility, transparency and accountability, accreditation contributes to ensuring that care meets the highest standards and can serve as a risk mitigation strategy. Quality management has become an indispensable tool for the management of a complex medical intervention such as HSCT. It allows the transplantation team to monitor its activities and identify areas for continuous improvement. The Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation invited a group of international experts in HSCT and quality management to work on providing a summary document about the key elements in quality and accreditation in HSCT and highlight the foremost challenges of implementing them, with a special focus on low- and middle-income economies.

Purpose: We evaluated outcomes of unrelated transplantation for primary refractory/relapsed (ref/rel) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), comparing two cohorts according to the year of transplant, 2000–2009 and 2010–2019. Patients and Methods: Multivariable analyses were performed using the Cox proportional-hazards regression model. Results: 3,430 patients were included; 876 underwent a transplant between 2000–2009 and 2554 in 2010–2019. Median follow-up was 8.7 (95% CI, 7.8–9.4) and 3.4 (95% CI, 3.1–3.6) years (P < 0.001). Median age was 52 (18–77) and 56 (18–79) years (P > 0.0001); 45.5% and 55.5% had refractory AML while 54.5% and 44.5% had relapsed AML. Conditioning was myeloablative in 60% and 52%, respectively. Neutrophil recovery and day 100 incidence of acute and 2-year incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) were similar between the two periods. Two-year relapse incidence was higher for patients undergoing transplant in the 2000–2009 period versus those undergoing transplant in 2010–2019: 50.2% versus 45.1% (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74–0.97; P = 0. 002). Leukemia-free survival; overall survival; and GvHD-free, relapse-free survival were lower for the 2000–2009 period: 26% versus 32.1% (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78–0.97; P = 0.01), 32.1% versus 38.1% (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77–0.96; P = 0.01), and 21.5% versus 25.3% (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81–0.99; P = 0.03), respectively. Two-year nonrelapse mortality was not significantly different (23.8% vs. 23.7%; HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.76–1.11; P = 0.34). Conclusions: Outcome of unrelated transplantation for patients with ref/rel AML has improved in the last two decades, rescuing about one third of the patients. See related commentary by Adrianzen-Herrera and Shastri, p. 4167

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a potentially curative treatment in high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Conditioning regimens based on ≥12 Gray total body irradiation (TBI) represent the current standard in patients ≤45 years, whereas elderly patients frequently receive intermediate intensity conditioning (IIC) to reduce toxicity. To evaluate the role of TBI as a backbone of IIC in ALL, a retrospective, registry-based study included patients >45 years transplanted from matched donors in first complete remission, who had received either fludarabine/TBI 8 Gy (FluTBI8, n = 262), or the most popular, irradiation-free alternative fludarabine/busulfan, comprising busulfan 6.4 mg/kg (FluBu6.4, n = 188) or 9.6 mg/kg (FluBu9.6, n = 51). At two years, overall survival (OS) was 68.5%, 57%, and 62.2%, leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 58%, 42.7%, and 45%, relapse incidence (RI) was 27.2%, 40%, and 30.9%, and non-relapse-mortality (NRM) was 23.1%, 20.7%, and 26.8% for patients receiving FluTBI8Gy, FluBu6.4, and FluBu9.6, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the risk of NRM, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease was not influenced by conditioning. However, RI was higher after FluBu6.4 (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI]: 1.85 [1.16–2.95]), and LFS was lower after both FluBu6.4 (HR: 1.56 [1.09–2.23]) and FluBu9.6 (HR: 1.63 [1.02–2.58]) as compared to FluTBI8. Although only resulting in a non-significant advantage in OS, this observation indicates a stronger anti-leukemic efficacy of TBI-based intermediate intensity conditioning.

Purpose:We evaluated outcomes of unrelated transplantation for primary refractory/relapsed (ref/rel) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), comparing two cohorts according to the year of transplant, 2000–2009 and 2010–2019.Patients and Methods:Multivariable analyses were performed using the Cox proportional-hazards regression model.Results:3,430 patients were included; 876 underwent a transplant between 2000–2009 and 2554 in 2010–2019. Median follow-up was 8.7 (95% CI, 7.8–9.4) and 3.4 (95% CI, 3.1–3.6) years (P < 0.001). Median age was 52 (18–77) and 56 (18–79) years (P > 0.0001); 45.5% and 55.5% had refractory AML while 54.5% and 44.5% had relapsed AML. Conditioning was myeloablative in 60% and 52%, respectively. Neutrophil recovery and day 100 incidence of acute and 2-year incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) were similar between the two periods. Two-year relapse incidence was higher for patients undergoing transplant in the 2000–2009 period versus those undergoing transplant in 2010–2019: 50.2% versus 45.1% (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74–0.97; P = 0. 002). Leukemia-free survival; overall survival; and GvHD-free, relapse-free survival were lower for the 2000–2009 period: 26% versus 32.1% (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78–0.97; P = 0.01), 32.1% versus 38.1% (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77–0.96; P = 0.01), and 21.5% versus 25.3% (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81–0.99; P = 0.03), respectively. Two-year nonrelapse mortality was not significantly different (23.8% vs. 23.7%; HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.76–1.11; P = 0.34).Conclusions:Outcome of unrelated transplantation for patients with ref/rel AML has improved in the last two decades, rescuing about one third of the patients.See related commentary by Adrianzen-Herrera and Shastri, p. 4167

Supplementary Data from Longitudinal Outcome over Two Decades of Unrelated Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: An ALWP/EBMT Analysis

The authors have requested that this preprint be removed from Research Square.

Cyclophosphamide is frequently substituted with fludarabine (Flu) in conditioning regimens before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). We aimed to compare retrospectively, total body irradiation (12 Gy) plus Flu (FluTBI12) versus busulfan (Bu) plus Flu (FB4) as a myeloablative conditioning before allo-HCT in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Out of 3203 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 109 patients treated with FluTBI12 and 213 treated with FB4 were included in a final matched-pair analysis. In both groups, median patient age was 41 years, first or second complete remission (CR1/CR2) proportion was 78%/22%, allo-HCT from an unrelated donor was performed in 78% of patients. The probabilities of leukemia-free survival and overall survival at 2 years in FluTBI12 and FB4 groups were 65% vs. 60% (p = 0.64) and 70% vs. 72% (p = 0.87), respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 19% vs. 29% (p = 0.11), while non-relapse mortality was 16% vs. 11%, respectively (p = 0.13). There were no statistical differences in both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) incidence. The probability of GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 49% for both groups. FluTBI12 and FB4 are comparable myeloablative regimens before allo-HCT in AML patients transplanted in CR1 and CR2.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) has a median age at diagnosis of 67 years. The most common curative therapy remains an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), yet it is complicated by treatment-related mortality (TRM) and ongoing morbidity including graft versus host disease (GVHD) that may impact survival, particularly in older patients. We examined the outcomes and predictors of success in 1321 patients aged 60 years and older receiving a HCT for AML in first complete remission (CR1) from 2007-2017 and reported to the CIBMTR. Outcomes were compared in three age cohorts (60-64; 65-69; 70+). With median follow-up of nearly 3 years, patients aged 60-64 had modestly, though significantly better OS, DFS and lower TRM than those either 65-69 or 70+; cohorts with similar outcomes. Three-year OS for the 3 cohorts was 49.4%, 42.3%, and 44.7% respectively (p = 0.026). TRM was higher with increasing age, cord blood as graft source and HCT-CI score of ≥3. Conditioning intensity was not a significant predictor of OS in the 60-69 cohort with 3-year OS of 46% for RIC and 49% for MAC (p = 0.38); MAC was rarely used over age 70. There was no difference in the relapse rate, incidence of Grade III/IV acute GVHD, or moderate-severe chronic GVHD across the age cohorts. After adjusting for other predictors, age had a small effect on OS and TRM. High-risk features including poor cytogenetics and measurable residual disease (MRD) prior to HCT were each significantly associated with relapse and accounted for most of the adverse impact on OS and DFS. Age did not influence the incidence of either acute or chronic GVHD; while graft type and associated GVHD prophylaxis were most important. These data suggest that age alone is not a barrier to successful HCT for AML in CR1 and should not exclude patients from HCT. Efforts should focus on minimizing residual disease and better donor selection.

Background: Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) is increasingly used for allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (allo-PBSCT) from an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) as an alternative to the standard anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. Following the demonstration that the use of PBSC haploidentical grafts results in more GvHD than bone marrow grafts, groups have attempted to reduce GvHD in haploidentical-PBSCT by adding ATG to PTCY. The experience of combined PTCY+ATG in the MUD allo-PBSCT is minimal and whether ATG brings any added value when PTCY is used in this setting is still unclear. Methods: In this registry-based study, we compared outcomes of 421 patients with PTCY and 151 patients with PTCY+ATG who underwent a first MUD allo-PBSCT for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in complete remission. Results: Characteristics of PTCY and PTCY+ATG patients were well balanced, including the number of additional immunosuppressive drugs, with the only significant difference between the two cohorts being the median year of transplant, and the follow-up period (19.6 versus 31.1 months, respectively, pConclusions: To date, the question of the best combination of GvHD-preventing drugs in the MUD-PBSCT setting remains unanswered. Our results highlight that in PTCY-based MUD-PBSCT for AML, the addition of ATG does not provide any extra benefit in terms of further GvHD reduction, better GRFS or better survival.

Trends in outcome of transplantation (HSCT) in secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) are limited. We evaluated results of HSCT in 4224 patients with sAML in complete remission; 1337 were transplanted in 2000-2010 and 2887 in 2011-2020. Median age was 54 (range, 18-74) and 59 (range, 18-78) years, respectively (p 0.0001). Donors were MSD in 65% vs. 37%, 10/10 UD in 27% vs. 50%, and 9/10 UD in 8% vs. 13%, respectively (p 0.0001). Conditioning was myeloablative in 46% and 38%, respectively. Two-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was lower in patients transplanted in 2011-2020 vs. those transplanted in 2000-2010, 18% vs. 21% (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68-0.9; p = 0.04) and modified GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.81-0.99; p = 0.04) was better in patients transplanted in the 2011-2020 vs. those transplanted in 2000-2010. Two-year relapse incidence (RI) was similar between the 2 groups with 32% vs. 31%, (HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.9-1.22; p = 0.55). Likewise, leukemia-free survival (LFS) (HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.84-1.07; p = 0.38) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.82-1.05; p = 0.26) were not significantly different between the two periods. In conclusion, Incidence of NRM has been significantly reduced and GRFS significantly increased in HSCT for sAML in the last 2 decades.

Importance Matched sibling donors (MSDs) are preferred for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in myelodysplastic syndrome even if they are older. However, whether older MSDs or younger human leukocyte antigen-matched unrelated donors (MUDs) are associated with better outcomes remains unclear. Objective To investigate whether allo-HCT for myelodysplastic syndrome using younger MUDs would be associated with improved disease-free survival and less relapse compared with older MSDs. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study assessed data reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database from 1761 adults 50 years or older with myelodysplastic syndrome who underwent allo-HCT using an older MSD or younger MUD between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017, with a median follow-up of 48 months. Data analysis was performed from January 8, 2019, to December 30, 2020. Interventions/Exposures Allo-HCT from an older MSD (donor age ���50 years) or a younger MUD (donor age ���35 years). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes were overall survival, relapse, nonrelapse mortality, acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), chronic GVHD, and GVHD-free relapse-free survival. Results Of 1761 patients (1162 [66%] male; median [range] age, 64.9 [50.2-77.6] years in the MSD cohort and 66.5 [50.4-80.9] years in MUD cohort), 646 underwent allo-HCT with an older MSD and 1115 with a younger MUD. In multivariable analysis, the rate of disease-free survival was significantly lower in allo-HCTs with older MSDs compared with younger MUDs (hazard ratio [HR], 1.17; 95% CI, 1.02-1.34; P���=���.02), whereas the difference in overall survival rate of allo-HCT with younger MUDs vs older MSDs was not statistically significant (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.98-1.29; P���=���.07). Allo-HCT with older MSDs was associated with significantly higher relapse (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.32-1.97; P���

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an integral part of the treatment strategy in patients with a hematological disorder. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is still an issue in patients who undergo HSCT. While several guidelines for the antiemetic therapy against CINV have been published, there is no detailed information about appropriate antiemetic drugs for each conditioning regimen in HSCT. Various studies reported that the triplet of 5-HT3RA, NK1RA, and dexamethasone appears useful in HSCT. However, each antiemetic has unique adverse effects or interactions with specific drugs. Here, we review the literature relating to clinical trials on the prevention of CINV, and summarize the information to clarify the benefit of antiemetic regimens.

The optimal conditioning regimen prior haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) with post transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains unknown. A non-myeloablative conditioning (NMAC) regimen (cyclophosphamide + fludarabine + TBI 2 Gy [CyFluTBI]) is a safe approach, but relapse incidence remains high in this setting. Alternatively, a reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen combining thiotepa and reduced-dose busulfan with fludarabine (TBF) may decrease AML relapse. However, an excess of toxicity may counterbalance this potential benefit. We retrospectively compared CyFluTBI vs. TBF in CR AML patients who underwent Haplo-SCT with PT-Cy, in two different populations based on age. We analyzed 490 patients. In patients aged

Comparative data of fludarabine, cytarabine and amsacrine (FLAMSA) chemotherapy followed by busulfan (Bu)-based reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) (FLAMSA-Bu) versus RIC regimens are lacking in patients with active relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) at the time of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Here, we retrospectively analyzed outcomes after FLAMSA-Bu versus fludarabine/busulfan (FluBu2) conditioning in this patient population. A total of 476 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of whom 257 received FluBu2 and 219 FLAMSA-Bu. Median follow-up was 41 months. Two-year non-relapse mortality (21%), graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (24%) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (29%) were not statistically different between cohorts. FLAMSA-Bu was associated with lower 2-year relapse incidence (RI) (38 vs 49% after FluBu2, p = 0.004), and increased leukemia-free survival (LFS) (42 vs 29%, p = 0.001), overall survival (47 vs 39%, p = 0.008) and grades II-IV acute GVHD (36 vs 20%, p = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, FLAMSA-Bu remained associated with lower RI (HR 0.69, p = 0.042), increased LFS (HR 0.74, p = 0.048) and a higher risk of acute GVHD (HR 2.06, p = 0.005). Notwithstanding the limitations inherent in this analysis, our data indicate that FLAMSA-Bu constitutes a tolerable conditioning strategy, resulting in a long-term benefit in a subset of patients reaching alloSCT with active disease., ERA is a recipient of a Río Hortega academic clinical fellowship (CM19/00194) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain.

In this registry-based study, we compared outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) transplanted in first complete remission (CR-1), following conditioning with total body irradiation (TBI) at a standard 12-Gray or at a lower 8-Gray total dose. Patients received fludarabine (flu) as the sole chemotherapy complementing TBI. Eight-Gray TBI/flu was used in 494 patients and 12-Gray TBI/flu in 145 patients. Eighty-eight (23.1%) and 36 (29%) of the patients had Ph-negative B-ALL, 222 (58.3%) and 53 (42.7%) had Ph-positive B-ALL, 71 (18.6%) and 35 (28.2%) T-ALL, respectively (P = 0.008). Patients treated with 8-Gray were older than ones received 12-Gray (median 55.7 versus 40.3 years, P < 0.0001) and were more frequently administered in vivo T-cell depletion (71% versus 40%, P

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only known treatment modality that can offer the possibility of cure for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Unfortunately, relapse and disease progression still occur in more than one third of cases even when patients are allografted in complete hematologic remission (CR). Treatment of AML relapsing after a first allo-HCT is particularly challenging. A second allo-HCT is offered to patients considered fit for the procedure, but reported outcomes have been conflicting. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the totality of evidence on the role of a second allo-HCT in patients with AML, we performed a comprehensive literature search using PUBMED/MEDLINE and EMBASE on August 25, 2021, and extracted clinical outcome data relating to benefits (CR, overall survival [OS], and progression-free/disease-free survival [PFS/DFS]) and harms (acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, non-relapse mortality [NRM], and relapse). The search identified 821 studies. Only 20 studies (n = 2772 patients) met our inclusion criteria. A second allo-HCT resulted in pooled CR, OS, PFS/DFS, NRM and relapse rates of 67%, 34%, 30%, 27%, and 51%, respectively. OS was 2-fold higher when the second allo-HCT was performed in CR (38% versus 17%) and 3-fold higher in patients who had a later relapse from the first allo-HCT (34% versus 10%). There was no apparent difference in pooled OS (hazard ratio = 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.31; P = .94) whether the same original donor or a different one was used. Notwithstanding several limitations apart from the high heterogeneity among included studies, this analysis shows that a second allo-HCT is a reasonable treatment option for relapsed AML. The procedure appears to be more effective when performed in CR and in patients who had a later relapse from the first allo-HCT. The high pooled relapse rates exceeding 50%, even when receiving the second allo-HCT in CR is worrisome and emphasizes the need to incorporate new therapies whether as post-transplantation maintenance or consolidation to mitigate relapse risk. This analysis was limited to patients receiving a second allo-HCT for the sole purpose of treating AML relapse. Accordingly, we caution against extrapolating these findings to other indications such as treatment of graft failure, poor graft function, or mixed donor chimerism.

In the original version of this article, the given and family names of Jacques-Emmanuel Galimard were incorrectly structured. The original article has been corrected. in press

Unmanipulated haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (haplo-PTCY) and unrelated double-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation (dUCBT) are feasible options for treating patients with high-risk acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). This study compared outcomes after dUCBT and haplo-HCT using peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) in adult patients with AML in complete remission (CR) who underwent transplantation in European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)-affiliated centers. In a population of adults with de novo AML in first or second CR, we compared outcomes after dUCBT (n = 165) and after haplo-PTCY PBSC (n = 544) performed between January 2013 and December 2018. Patients receiving in vivo antithymocyte globulin, Campath, or ex vivo T cell depletion were excluded. The median follow-up was 33 months for the haplo-PTCY arm and 52 months for the dUCBT arm. No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 arms in the rates of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; P =. 18), grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR, 1.17; P =. 56), chronic GVHD (HR,. 86; P =. 48), relapse (HR, 1.07; P =. 77), nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (HR,. 94; P =. 77), leukemia-free survival (LFS) (HR,. 99; P =. 95), or overall survival (OS) (HR,. 99; P =. 97). Favorable cytogenetic risk was the sole factor predictive of lower relapse incidence (RI). Younger age at transplantation was associated with lower NRM and higher LFS and OS. Both dUCBT and haplo-PTCY with PBSCs can be considered valid approaches for adult AML patients in CR. New strategies should be investigated in both settings to define the most appropriate conditioning regimen and potentially decrease RI and NRM through better immune reconstitution and optimal supportive care.

Thrombosis is a recognized complication in sickle cell disease (SCD). Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the sole curative option for patients with severe SCD phenotypes. Data describing the effects of allo-HCT on recurrent thrombotic events (venous and arterial events) are limited, however. We evaluated 31 patients with SCD who underwent allo-HCT with a median follow-up of 34.5 months (range, 13 to 115) post-transplantation. No patient continued anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy after allo-HCT. There was an absolute difference of 32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.3% to 32.2%; P = .002) in the prevalence of venous thromboembolic (VTE) events before and after allo-HSCT. In addition, there was an absolute difference of 38.5% (95% CI, 10.63 to 45.96; P = .006) in the number of ischemic cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) occurring before and after allo-HSCT. Patients with severe SCD who undergo allo-HCT are less likely to develop recurrent thrombotic events compared with a control cohort of patients matched for age and genotype (odds ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.058 to 0.83; P = .025). Following curative therapy with allo-HCT, there is a reduction in recurrent arterial and venous thrombosis in patients with severe SCD phenotypes.

T cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options and poor long-term survival. Previous studies of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for T-PLL are limited by small numbers, and descriptions of patient and transplantation characteristics and outcomes after alloHCT are sparse. In this study, we evaluated outcomes of alloHCT in patients with T-PLL and attempted to identify predictors of post-transplantation relapse and survival. We conducted an analysis of data using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database on 266 patients with T-PLL who underwent alloHCT between 2008 and 2018. The 4-year rates of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse, and treatment-related mortality (TRM) were 30.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.8% to 36.5%), 25.7% (95% CI, 20% to 32%), 41.9% (95% CI, 35.5% to 48.4%), and 32.4% (95% CI, 26.4% to 38.6%), respectively. In multivariable analyses, 3 variables were associated with inferior OS: receipt of a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen (hazard ratio [HR], 2.18; P < .0001), age >60 years (HR, 1.61; P = .0053), and suboptimal performance status, defined by Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) 90 or chemosensitive disease.

Measurable residual disease (MRD) status pre-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has been shown to predict transplant outcomes. We investigated the effect of Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) on acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) relapse by pretransplant MRD status. AML patients undergoing allo-HCT in first complete remission from either a matched sibling or unrelated donor during the 2006-2017 period were selected. Outcomes of 1509 patients (MRD

Dosing regimens for antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and anti-CD52 antibody (alemtuzumab) for graft vs. host disease prophylaxis (GVHD) are empiric or weight-based, and do not account for individual patient factors. Recently, it has been shown that recipient peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) on the day of ATG administration interacts with the dose of ATG administered to predict transplantation outcome. Similarly, we wanted to analyze if the recipient ALC interacts with alemtuzumab dosing to predict outcomes. We retrospectively compared 364 patients, 124 patients receiving ATG (anti-thymocyte globulin) for GVHD prophylaxis, and undergoing unrelated first allogeneic transplant for myeloid and lymphoid malignancies (group 1) to 240 patients receiving alemtuzumab (group 2), in similar time period. There was no difference in survival or acute and chronic GVHD between 60 and 100 mg of alemtuzumab dosing. Unlike ATG (where the pre-transplant recipient ALC interacted with ATG dose on day of its administration (day 1) to predict OS and DFS (p = 0.05), within alemtuzumab group, the recipient ALC on second day of alemtuzumab administration (day 2) and its interaction with alemtuzumab dose strongly predicted OS, DFS and relapse (p = 0.05, HR-1.81, 1.1–3.3; p = 0.002, HR-2.41, CI, 1.3–4.2; and p = 0.003, HR-2.78, CI, 1.4–5.2), respectively. ALC (day 2) of 0.08 × 109/lit or higher, had a specificity of 96% in predicting inferior DFS. Like ATG, there is definite but differential interaction between the recipient peripheral blood ALC and alemtuzumab dose to predict OS, DFS, and relapses.

Table S1. Post-transplant cell therapy. Table S2. Drug doses in the three conditioning regimens (TBF, FT, FLAMSA). Table S3. Univariate analysis of ATG yes vs no stratified by conditioning regimen. (DOC 110 kb)

List of institutions reporting the patients’ data for the study. (DOCX 33 kb)

Supplemental figures 1–3 and Tables 1–2. (DOCX 670 kb)

List of participating centers. (DOCX 20Â kb)

List of institutions reporting patientsâ data for the study. (DOCX 38Â kb)

List of institutions reporting patients’ data for the study. (DOCX 29 kb)

Bortezomib has demonstrated substantial activity in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma and is widely incorporated into treatment strategies across the different settings. It is interesting to note that data are accumulating to suggest that the activity of bortezomib extends beyond the tumor cell and microenvironment to encompass effects on bone metabolism. Indeed, data from both the preclinical and clinical settings have suggested that bortezomib directly stimulates osteoblast growth and differentiation, while also inhibiting osteoclast development and activity. Notably, in the clinical setting, the bone anabolic effects of bortezomib could be demonstrated by the healing of lytic lesions as noted in some patients. These results are of importance because bone disease is a hallmark of myeloma and therefore any agent that combines antimyeloma activity with positive effects on bone is of substantial interest. However, further studies are needed to establish how the agent should be used for the treatment of patients with bone disease.