1. ‘Pre-launch’ finite element analysis of a short-stem total hip arthroplasty system consisting of two implant types
- Author
-
Matthias Lerch, Anas Bouguecha, Henning Windhagen, Amer Almohallami, Bernd-Arno Behrens, Agnes-Elisabeth Kurtz, and Stefan Budde
- Subjects
Male ,Materials science ,Bone density ,Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Finite Element Analysis ,Biophysics ,Prosthesis Design ,Bone remodeling ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Bone Density ,medicine ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Femur ,Reduction (orthopedic surgery) ,Fixation (histology) ,Orthodontics ,030222 orthopedics ,Calcar ,Trochanter ,biology ,030229 sport sciences ,biology.organism_classification ,Valgus ,Bone Remodeling ,Hip Prosthesis ,Implant - Abstract
Background We applied a previously established and validated numerical model to a novel short-stemmed implant for a ‘pre-launch’ investigation. Methods The implant system consists of two different implant geometries for valgus/varus-positioned proximal femurs with differences in volume distribution, head/neck angle, and calcar alignment. The aim of the design was to achieve a better adaption to the anatomic conditions, resulting in a favourable load transfer. The implant type G showed the best fit to our model, but both stem geometries were implanted; the implant type B was used to compute an ‘imperfection scenario’. Findings Apparent bone density decreased by 4.3% in the entire femur with the implant type G, and by 12.3% with the implant type B. Bone mass loss was pronounced in the proximal calcar region. Apparent bone density increased at the lateral cortical ring and in the minor trochanter. The apparent bone density in the imperfection scenario was very similar to that of a straight stem, indicating a distal load transfer. Interpretation No adverse effects of the A2 short-stemmed implant system on bone remodeling could be detected. The overall bone density reduction was acceptable, and wedge fixation was not observed, indicating that there was no distal load transfer. The simulation of an incongruous implant indicates the sensitivity of our model in response to modifications of implant positioning. Correct implant selection and positioning is crucial when using the A2 system.
- Published
- 2019